1,238 reputation
11443
bio website axiomsofchoice.org
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 6 months
seen 3 hours ago

dr pavel im cia he wasnt alone uh you dont get to bring friends theyre not my friends dont worry no charge for them and why would i want them they were trying to grab your prize they work for the mercenary the masketta man bane aye get them on board ill call ittin the flight plan i just filed with the agency lists smee maimen doctor pavelheer button lee juan ovyu first one to talk gets to stay on my aircraft who paid you to grab dr pavel he didnt fly so good who wants to try next tell me about bane why does he wear the mask a lotta loyalty for a hired gun or perhaps he's wondering why someone would shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane at least you can talk who are you it doesnt matter who we are what matters is our plan if i pull that off will you die it would be extremely painful youre a big guy for you was getting caught part of your plan of course dr pavel refused our offer in favor of yours we had to find out what he told you nothing i said nothing well congratulations you got yourself caught sir now whats the next step of your master plan crashing this plane with no survivors no they expect one of us in the wreckage brother have we started the fire yes the fire rises calm down doctor nows not the time for fear that comes later


Sep
30
awarded  Explainer
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Sep
23
awarded  Yearling
Sep
11
awarded  Nice Answer
Sep
11
comment How can we say that a wave function follows Schrödinger equation using operators?
If by energy operator you mean that it's a function value of $H$, i.e. $Â=F(H)$, for example $Â:=4H+H^4$, then $Â$ and $H$ have the same eigenfunctions. (I'm pretty sure about this, certainly in the common cases, but not in general. Look up the spectral theorem. Maybe there are pathological functional analysis scenarios I can't think of right now, it happens sometimes. You know, such that if $F$ is ill-behaved, the domain of $H$ and $F(H)$ is different etc.)
Sep
11
revised How can we say that a wave function follows Schrödinger equation using operators?
added 5 characters in body
Sep
11
answered How can we say that a wave function follows Schrödinger equation using operators?
Sep
6
comment Difference between Hamiltonian in classical Mechanics and in quantum Mechanics
@Wingonafly: Regarding your response to the second point, what you derive from what is a matter of choice. Usually the Schrödinger equation isn't taken to be derived from anything but taking as a starting point. I don't know what you mean by "How do you answer the question about..." because your initial post didn't even include specific questions. A main difference is that classical observables always commute.
Sep
6
revised Difference between Hamiltonian in classical Mechanics and in quantum Mechanics
added 15 characters in body
Sep
6
answered Difference between Hamiltonian in classical Mechanics and in quantum Mechanics
Aug
22
revised How long does it take plasma to radiate its heat?
gramma etsetera
Aug
22
suggested approved edit on How long does it take plasma to radiate its heat?
Aug
19
comment How much energy would the Human Torch need?
Joke's on you, The Human Torch is pretty far from being human.
Aug
3
awarded  Popular Question
Jul
28
comment Is this really a golden ratio spiral?
Do you know what the object of your interest actually is? If no, search the web for a definition. Once you understand it, there will be no barrier to take the picture and test it yourself.
Jul
24
revised Bug riding on a ball moving at almost the speed of light
description?
Jul
24
suggested approved edit on Bug riding on a ball moving at almost the speed of light
Jul
10
comment How can blackbody radition be explained by quantization?
Maybe this question relates as well.
Jul
8
comment Laplace operator's interpretation
@mcodesmart: don't worry.. it was fun!
Jul
7
comment English translation of Heisenberg's paper ``Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik''
As a German speaking person, I'd like to add that I find the translation "actual content" a little debatable. It sounds harsher than "anschauliche Inhalt", which could be translated to "the content which can actually be visualized (maybe opposed to that which is formal but has not clear correspondence to something real)". In particular, "actual content" implies that the other half isn't proper content, while the German expression doesn't imply that.