949 reputation
326
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 9 months
seen 10 hours ago
stats profile views 867

Actress with an interest in the philosophy of science.


Mar
27
answered How long can you survive 1 million degrees?
Mar
27
comment General Relativity exact analytical solutions
@JerrySchirmer: Not that I'd do anything with the information, but what are these pathologies? How do these spacetimes look unphysical?
Mar
27
comment General Relativity exact analytical solutions
@JerrySchirmer: Like $g_{\mu\nu}(x)=\eta_{\mu\nu}$ and trivial bogus like that :D
Mar
27
comment General Relativity exact analytical solutions
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_solutions_in_general_relativity
Mar
27
answered Which units has the relation $E=mc^2$?
Mar
26
comment Inner Product Spaces
@joshphysics: I'm a physicist and I like my bras to be curved. Okay, too easy.
Mar
25
comment How is gradient the maximum rate of change of a function?
You've just taken the englisch grammar out of the title.
Mar
25
revised “as measured in a local Lorentz frame”?
added 53 characters in body
Mar
25
answered “as measured in a local Lorentz frame”?
Mar
24
answered Derivative of covariant EM tensor
Mar
23
revised What is a dual / cotangent space?
added 532 characters in body
Mar
23
revised What is a dual / cotangent space?
added 532 characters in body
Mar
23
answered What is a dual / cotangent space?
Mar
22
comment Classical scattering of two particles by a Yukawa potential
@MichaelBrown: I have no idea regarding the integral in the impact parameter link and I don't know how to directly put up the equation of motion since the particle $B$ will be accelerated too giving a super nonlinear potential $\frac{\exp{(-|\Delta r(t)|/\lambda)}}{|\Delta r(t)|}$ .
Mar
21
revised Classical scattering of two particles by a Yukawa potential
deleted 22 characters in body
Mar
21
asked Classical scattering of two particles by a Yukawa potential
Mar
21
revised Integration by parts to derive relativistic kinetic energy
added 45 characters in body
Mar
21
answered Integration by parts to derive relativistic kinetic energy
Mar
21
comment Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms
Whatever is mathematically proven must be w.r.t. some postulates and these are not stated. Also, there are the observable who's probabilities sum to 100% (namely the probability to be in any of a total set of eigenstates) and in this sense it's just probability theory with complex dynamics under the hood. I still don't think this is an inappropriate formulation.
Mar
21
comment Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms
@user9886: The integrals involving position operators are layman's terms?