meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | 4 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 853 |
Actress with an interest in the philosophy of science.
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
How is gradient the maximum rate of change of a function? You've just taken the englisch grammar out of the title. |
|
Mar 25 |
revised |
“as measured in a local Lorentz frame”? added 53 characters in body |
|
Mar 25 |
answered | “as measured in a local Lorentz frame”? |
|
Mar 24 |
answered | Derivative of covariant EM tensor |
|
Mar 23 |
revised |
What is a dual / cotangent space? added 532 characters in body |
|
Mar 23 |
revised |
What is a dual / cotangent space? added 532 characters in body |
|
Mar 23 |
answered | What is a dual / cotangent space? |
|
Mar 22 |
comment |
Classical scattering of two particles by a Yukawa potential @MichaelBrown: I have no idea regarding the integral in the impact parameter link and I don't know how to directly put up the equation of motion since the particle $B$ will be accelerated too giving a super nonlinear potential $\frac{\exp{(-|\Delta r(t)|/\lambda)}}{|\Delta r(t)|}$ . |
|
Mar 21 |
revised |
Classical scattering of two particles by a Yukawa potential deleted 22 characters in body |
|
Mar 21 |
asked | Classical scattering of two particles by a Yukawa potential |
|
Mar 21 |
revised |
Integration by parts to derive relativistic kinetic energy added 45 characters in body |
|
Mar 21 |
answered | Integration by parts to derive relativistic kinetic energy |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms Whatever is mathematically proven must be w.r.t. some postulates and these are not stated. Also, there are the observable who's probabilities sum to 100% (namely the probability to be in any of a total set of eigenstates) and in this sense it's just probability theory with complex dynamics under the hood. I still don't think this is an inappropriate formulation. |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms @user9886: The integrals involving position operators are layman's terms? |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms I'm not too happy with the formulation of "mathematical systems that can yield a nontrivial formalism for probability." Firstly, becuase it sounds like you imply that there are only these two "systems", and secondly, because the quantum framework is still one where "each outcome has a probability, and those probabilities directly add up to 100%." It's just extra dynamics under the hood. |
|
Mar 21 |
answered | Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms |
|
Mar 21 |
answered | Where do the conservation laws come from? |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
QFT in Quantum Computing and Control Theory? I'd naively interpret the quantum mechanics of quantum computing to be that section of the formalism which doesn't deal with explicit spatial dependence. Even if the framework (Hilbert spaces, yada yada) is the same, the papers on computing/optics look like "$|010\rangle $" while the papers on high energy physics look like "$\int \Psi(x)|\Omega\rangle $" |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
What does the Atomic Form Factor means? Have you checked en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_form_factor ? |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
A partial differential equation for kinetic energy Making a product ansatz, leads to the equation being solved for all of $K(m,v)=(\frac{m}{2a}+d)(a v^2+bv+c)$. |
