559 reputation
316
bio website
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 2 months
seen Sep 24 at 21:31

Jul
2
awarded  Curious
May
24
awarded  Popular Question
Apr
29
awarded  Notable Question
Dec
3
awarded  Popular Question
Oct
3
awarded  Popular Question
Sep
5
awarded  Yearling
Aug
16
awarded  Popular Question
Mar
17
awarded  Popular Question
Feb
28
awarded  Nice Question
Dec
26
accepted When does a pot not spill?
Oct
2
awarded  Nice Question
Sep
5
awarded  Yearling
Aug
25
comment How can new interpretations of QM help?
@RonMaimon: Not an existing one. Any interpretation that could be found in the future. However, if there is no practical problem to solve, even a new interpretation wouldn't provide new value. Btw, is the work of Hooft considered serious? Did he have any concrete results?
Jun
5
comment Adding 3 electron spins
Thanks. I tried a brute force approach diagonalizing the 8x8 matrix for total angular momentum. The result was img31.imageshack.us/img31/6228/3spins.png. The cyclic operator turned out to be nice and also works for 4 spins. I need to study your approach - I forgot the basics :) A bit surprising that there is no easy answer.
Jun
5
comment Show quantum entanglement to a classical thinker
I'll have to study that paper. Then just a last question. Has there been absolutely no objection to the set up? Because the CHSH inequality should (apart from statistics) allow for a statement no matter what physically happens unexpectedly. Unless there are additional assumptions about physical measurements needed. Of course you do not need 100% correlation but only above a limit.
Jun
5
comment Show quantum entanglement to a classical thinker
Thanks, talks exactly about this question. The answer of Frédéric describes it a bit more, too.
Jun
4
accepted Show quantum entanglement to a classical thinker
Jun
4
comment Show quantum entanglement to a classical thinker
This is pretty good answer to the question :) Does that mean there is an experiment which is close to 100% winning? It could be an objection if the required state is not realizable. How can I find that experimental test?
Jun
4
comment Show quantum entanglement to a classical thinker
Thanks! This looks quite promising and I have to study this closer! I read the CHSH inequality, but havent got a deeper grasp on it. When a layman asked me what I'm trying to understand, I knew which way I wanted to answer, but wasn't sure how to frame the CHSH this way.
Jun
4
asked Show quantum entanglement to a classical thinker