meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 11 months |
| seen | 10 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 206 |
|
Sep 28 |
comment |
Superluminal neutrinos @Jonathan ok, I'll edit my answer to answer the question more clearly |
|
Sep 27 |
answered | Epistemologically, can we ever deduce the 'true' theory of everything? |
|
Sep 27 |
answered | Basic question concerning pure energy |
|
Sep 26 |
comment |
Why does $\frac{\partial \mathbf{v}_i}{\partial \dot{q}_j} = \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}_i}{\partial q_j}$? It would make your answer clearer if you point out that you can change the order of the second order partial differentiation in the 1st and 3rd terms. |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
Superluminal neutrinos @jonathan I'll delete my answer if neutrinos travelling faster than c is confirmed, big question or not ;) |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
The bar tender says we don't serve Tachyons around here? Aha! I looked at the poster as a whole, not realizing it was meant to be read from top to bottom |
|
Sep 25 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Sep 25 |
accepted | The bar tender says we don't serve Tachyons around here? |
|
Sep 23 |
revised |
The bar tender says we don't serve Tachyons around here? deleted 18 characters in body |
|
Sep 23 |
comment |
The bar tender says we don't serve Tachyons around here? Is this really off topic? it's a physics joke about some physics principle that moving faster that c means time going backwards, according to one answer. |
|
Sep 23 |
asked | The bar tender says we don't serve Tachyons around here? |
|
Sep 22 |
answered | Superluminal neutrinos |
|
Sep 6 |
answered | How should a physics student study mathematics? |
|
Sep 3 |
asked | What was meant by the 'ponderomotive force' as understood by Minkowski? |
|
Sep 1 |
comment |
Is Einstein's 1916 General Relativity paper a recommended way to start learning about the subject? @jen the general consensus going by the answers and comments is to learn general relativity from a modern text book first, and then to go back to Einsten's paper. |
|
Sep 1 |
comment |
Is Einstein's 1916 General Relativity paper a recommended way to start learning about the subject? It's ok, im familar with the text book recommendations. I thought there might be something more fundamental to do with Mach's Principle as given in this answer physics.stackexchange.com/questions/4519/… |
|
Sep 1 |
awarded | Student |
|
Sep 1 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Sep 1 |
revised |
Is Einstein's 1916 General Relativity paper a recommended way to start learning about the subject? deleted 52 characters in body |
|
Sep 1 |
asked | Is Einstein's 1916 General Relativity paper a recommended way to start learning about the subject? |
