| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 11 months |
| seen | Mar 28 at 14:18 | |
| stats | profile views | 2 |
|
Jun 20 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jun 20 |
accepted | infinite grid of planets with newtonian gravity |
|
Jun 17 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
infinite grid of planets with newtonian gravity the gravitational potential stuff, would you consider that to be a part of Newtonian mechanics? I'm willing to write off all of my assumptions as soon as we talk about general relativity, simply because I don't understand enough to have any intuition about what's going on. Does any of what you say show ill-defined-ness or non-equilibruim in a purely Newtonian/Euclidean setup? |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
infinite grid of planets with newtonian gravity I can only really answer your last point here: if I understand you correctly, the integrand being an odd function means that the force on each planet is zero, but shifting the centre of the spherical coordinates to get a non-zero result is fine. This amounts to saying that the gravitation force at those points is non-zero, but there's no mass on which to act at those points so that's fine. |
|
Jun 13 |
comment |
infinite grid of planets with newtonian gravity I realise that equilibrium would be unstable. I still don't think anything will move without some other perturbation. |
|
Jun 13 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jun 13 |
asked | infinite grid of planets with newtonian gravity |