meta user
network profile
| bio | website | physics.stackexchange.com/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 11 months |
| seen | May 20 at 8:31 | |
| stats | profile views | 23 |
Physics Major at the University of Waterloo
|
Dec 13 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 3 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Dec 3 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Sep 5 |
comment |
Dimensional analysis restricted to rational exponents? I've chosen to accept this question instead as I feel the answer is more concrete than the previously accepted one. I appreciate the examples in particular. Still, I wish that the other aspect of my question: "Why is it beneficial to restrict dimensional analysis to rational exponents?" was discussed more. |
|
Sep 5 |
accepted | Dimensional analysis restricted to rational exponents? |
|
Aug 7 |
asked | Dimensional analysis restricted to rational exponents? |
|
Jul 1 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jun 21 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Jun 21 |
accepted | Constrained particles under distance dependent force |
|
Jun 20 |
comment |
Constrained particles under distance dependent force I'm a little bit confused here, and perhaps I'm missing something. I thought the equation $x = x_{0} + v_{0}t + \frac{1}{2}at^{2}$ applied only to uniform acceleration. That's not the case here is it? |
|
Jun 20 |
asked | Constrained particles under distance dependent force |
|
Jun 18 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jun 18 |
accepted | Analyzing the motion of a ball rolling without slipping inside a hemispherical bowl |
|
Jun 18 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jun 18 |
asked | Analyzing the motion of a ball rolling without slipping inside a hemispherical bowl |
