| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Belgium | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 6 months |
| seen | 18 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 581 |
"I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
-- Bertrand Russell
|
Jun 17 |
revised |
How can I stand on the ground? EM or/and Pauli? deleted 12 characters in body |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
How can I stand on the ground? EM or/and Pauli? Here's another link. |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
How can I stand on the ground? EM or/and Pauli? I posted that link almost two years ago, I don't remember needing a password back then. I can try to update the link though. |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | Wind Turbine Impact |
|
Jun 12 |
comment |
Transforming a sound wave into a literal light wave. Is it possible? Something like sonoluminescence? |
|
Jun 9 |
revised |
Common false beliefs in Physics added 4 characters in body |
|
Jun 9 |
revised |
Common false beliefs in Physics added 274 characters in body |
|
Jun 8 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Jun 8 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Jun 3 |
comment |
Why do rockets accelerate fastest horizontally? The other possibility is that you just are not reporting the question correctly to us. |
|
Jun 1 |
comment |
How to prove Galilean invariance? Your mistake is simply that you assume that $F$ and $a$ have to transform according to $G$ under Galilean transformations. That is not true however. $F$ and $a$ do not change under translation and boosts. Only under rotations. |
|
Jun 1 |
comment |
How to prove Galilean invariance? @Wox: The general case can be deduced from the special case. If you show separately that Newton's equation is invariant under rotations and under translations, then it's just a matter of combining the three types of transformations. But this follows because of the fact that we are working in a group. |
|
May 30 |
comment |
What do scientists believe about existence in dimensions? This is just a very bad question. It makes no sense, is so rife with confusion that the best thing we could possibly do is to tell you to go read at least a popular book on the subject like a book by Stephen Hawking or Brian Greene. |
|
May 30 |
answered | Open Ended/ Close Ended instruments? |
|
May 29 |
answered | Where can I find beginner's information about quantum mechanics? |
|
May 29 |
comment |
About Susskind's claim “information is indestructible” This is tied to the unitarity of QM evolutions. |
|
May 27 |
comment |
Given entanglement, why is it permissible to consider the quantum state of subsystems? Best answer here. Deserves more points. |
|
May 26 |
comment |
How to prove Wick's Theorem (Zee's eq. I.2 (16)) via Gaussian integration? Just derive your expression a second time w.r.t. $J_m$. Already you should see that there will be a non-zero term. So you shouldn't expect the entire expression to be zero. |
|
May 12 |
comment |
How Light or Water Intensity is equal to square modulus of wave function of Light or Water Waves $I=|\psi|^2 \,$? The short answer is: the wave function is the amplitude, not the intensity. The square of the wave function is the intensity. Intensities don't add up, amplitudes do. So $I=I_1+I_2$ is in general wrong. |
|
May 10 |
comment |
Why did Feynman's thesis almost work? Very nice question. I've read more in detail about the Feynman-Wheeler approach in the book "Action at a Distance in Physics and Cosmology" by Fred Hoyle and Jayant Narlikar. They build up a theory of gravity in the same spirit as the Feynman-Wheeler theory. It does not seem to fit observations though. |