meta user
network profile
| bio | website | amazon.com/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years |
| seen | Oct 18 '12 at 11:05 | |
| stats | profile views | 101 |
|
May 18 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Schrödinger's equation, time reversal, negative energy and antimatter I thought you were drunk |
|
Oct 17 |
comment |
Schrödinger's equation, time reversal, negative energy and antimatter Hmm. You state "It seems that you think that you may freely replace t by −t and change nothing else", actually I stated "if I break time into two sets, past -t and future +t AND allow energy to have only negative values for -t, and positive values for +t," so both Energy and Time are inverted. Nope, no cigar. |
|
Oct 17 |
asked | Schrödinger's equation, time reversal, negative energy and antimatter |
|
Sep 29 |
asked | momentum four vector and dirac matrices |
|
Sep 8 |
comment |
false vacuum original paper thanks Twist and Ron, and if anyone else is looking I found an original scan at ccdb5fs.kek.jp/cgi-bin/img_index?197703088 |
|
Sep 8 |
accepted | false vacuum original paper |
|
Sep 7 |
asked | false vacuum original paper |
|
Jun 14 |
revised |
weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation correct feynmann diagram |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation @dmckee Doesn't the beta decay implicitly have a three vertex with a $\bar{\nu }_e$ , $e^-$ and $W^-$,but yes your right about the whole interaction being incomprehensible - I'll redraw it . |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation @RonMaimon Sorry Ron, mea culpa, I meant the positive and negative meant the charges on the W bosons. |
|
Jun 14 |
revised |
weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation added Feynman diagram to illustrate problem |
|
Jun 14 |
revised |
weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation added indices to W particles |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation Yes I agree and can see how electrons and positrons are each others antiparticles. Where the positron is the negative energy state of the electron taken in the forward direction of time. But note, a $W^+$ decays into a $e^+$ and e-neutrino - doesn't that imply the $W^+$ is like the positron and is the antiparticle to the $W^-$ ? |
|
Jun 13 |
asked | weak bosons and feynman-stueckelberg interpretation |
|
Jun 8 |
asked | General equation of motion for elementary particles |
|
Jun 6 |
comment |
top quark and Z,W bosons? Alright, I can see now. Thanks all! |
|
Jun 5 |
revised |
top quark and Z,W bosons? added decay times |
|
Jun 5 |
comment |
top quark and Z,W bosons? Wait up - there's another coincidence - the decay times of t,Z,W are all close to 10^-25 s, so the masses match up and the decay times. That hints at more than a coincidence. |
|
Jun 5 |
revised |
top quark and Z,W bosons? added 646 characters in body |
