meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years |
| seen | Apr 11 at 21:35 | |
| stats | profile views | 127 |
As somebody used to say:
Does research. Smokes. Battles administration. Smokes. Wishes he could stop battling administration so that he could have more time to do research. Smokes some more.
The same. Except I do not smoke.
|
Jul 31 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Collision time of Brownian particles added 52 characters in body; added 27 characters in body |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Collision time of Brownian particles added 22 characters in body |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Zero magnetization of spin model without external magnetic field @Marek: Good job. A minor quibble: if Gibbs measures are phases then $\mu_0^\beta=\frac12(\mu_-^\beta+\mu_+^\beta)$ is also a phase. As you know $\mu_0^\beta$ is the thermodynamic limit for a free boundary just like $\mu_\pm^\beta$ are thermodynamic limits for $\pm$ boundaries. Hence $\mu_0^\beta$ is not only a mathematical artefact (contrarily to what a too fast reading of your post could imply). |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Editor |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Collision time of Brownian particles added 632 characters in body |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Zero magnetization of spin model without external magnetic field At $\beta=\beta_c$, there is only one phase. |
|
May 7 |
answered | Collision time of Brownian particles |
