1,141 reputation
411
bio website marty-green.blogspot.com
location Canada
age
visits member for 3 years, 3 months
seen 6 hours ago

Nov
8
comment Photon wave packets from distant stars
Okay. So what exactly is the role of light in the photographic process if not the reduction of silver bromide?
Nov
8
comment Photon wave packets from distant stars
I don't know what the business about dyes has to do with my "Theory". I only claimed to analyze the thermodynamics of the silver bromide=> metallic silver conversion. You call my analysis "amateurish": are you saying it's wrong?
Nov
7
answered Photon wave packets from distant stars
Nov
6
comment Proofs that every professional physicist should know
Yes, that's right. You can actually get a pretty good ballpark of this lambda-squared dependency by working off my diagram. But even without the mathematics, the diagram shows that the available power depends only on the wave-on-wave interaction, not the size of the receiver. That's why I'm appalled when I read authorities like Scully debunking the wave theory of light on the basis of the physical cross-section of an atom.
Nov
6
comment Proofs that every professional physicist should know
Did you read my article which Helder referenced? The photoelectric effect is classically impossible only if you insist on using a tiny charged ping-pong ball as your model of the electron. If you use a proper quantum model of the electron, namely Schroedinger's equation, then Maxwell's equations are sufficient to complete the picture. If the photoelectric effect is classically impossible, then the crystal radio is also classically impossible.
Nov
6
comment Proofs that every professional physicist should know
Thanks, Helder. I'm not used to people agreeing with me.
Nov
6
answered Proofs that every professional physicist should know
Nov
3
comment When is the force null between parallel conducting wires?
Have you thought carefully about how the impedance approaches zero for very low frequencies? Do you think the physical attraction between the two wires will be different depending on if the current is DC or if the current is 60 Hz?
Nov
2
comment When is the force null between parallel conducting wires?
No, this is wrong. The characteristic impedance depends only on the geometry of the line, and it doesn't depend on frequency. Every transmission line has a characteristic impedance. I don't remember the formula but it has L and C in it, not R and G. For any transmission line, when the load impedance is equal to the line impedance, the reflected wave is zero. It has nothing to do with the ohms in the copper lines.
Nov
2
comment When is the force null between parallel conducting wires?
Do you doubt that the resistance calculated by Gales after one week of effort is not simply the characteristic impedance of the line, as I was able to conjecture at once without a single line of mathematics?
Nov
1
comment Why did Schrodinger never budge on the meaning of $|\Psi|^2$
Oh come on now. The whole point of the cat parable was to ridicule the people who talked about the importance of consciousness.
Nov
1
comment When is the force null between parallel conducting wires?
I think I was pretty clear about this. I said you can verify it pretty easily for a parallel plate transmission line, and I'm guessing that the result generalizes to all transmission lines. Is there a problem with that?
Nov
1
answered When is the force null between parallel conducting wires?
Nov
1
comment Why did Schrodinger never budge on the meaning of $|\Psi|^2$
Schroedinger's cat was not his way of "acknowledging that the universe was some sort of multi-possible universe entity". It was his way of ridiculing the Copenhagen school and its probability interpretation, where collapse was dependent upon an "observation" being made.
Oct
31
revised Why did Schrodinger never budge on the meaning of $|\Psi|^2$
added 874 characters in body
Oct
31
answered Why did Schrodinger never budge on the meaning of $|\Psi|^2$
Oct
29
answered Why does only one side of a neon lamp glow?
Oct
26
answered Usefullness of an only qualitative understanding of momentum?
Oct
25
comment Is Gravity Energy?
Well, that's the question: do they? We can track the energy of the electrostatic field via E^2 dV, and when field energy disappears it reappears as kinetic energy of the charged particles. Gravity is different. If we calculate the square of the gravitational field and integrate it over space, we get something that looks like the electric field energy. But if we drop a stone to the ground, the kinetic energy increases and at the same time, the square of the field energy also increases. So you can't keep track of energy changes by looking at the field. It's very different from electrostatics.
Oct
9
comment How are we able to view an object in a room with bulb..?
Cool simulation. Well done.