222 reputation
210
bio website
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 6 months
seen May 19 at 6:39

Oct
26
comment Why is general relativity only formulated in continuum terms?
Poisson's equation related to continuous mass distribution. The version that related to discrete mass distribution is simply one that defines the potential field as the sum of potential fields $-mG/r$ generated by each discrete point particle. What is the GR equivalent?
Oct
25
comment Why is general relativity only formulated in continuum terms?
I don't understand. In Newtonian Mechanics, space (and time) is continuous, but yet particles are discrete beings and we can formulate the theory as it applies to them.
Oct
12
comment Equivalences and derivations in Newtonian/Classical Mechanics
Perhaps you can expand on that in your answer (with a short proof or a source)? Thanks!
Oct
12
comment Equivalences and derivations in Newtonian/Classical Mechanics
So, what about the other way around? How does one show if the Second and Third laws a consequence of the conservation laws?
Oct
12
comment Equivalences and derivations in Newtonian/Classical Mechanics
I saw this in: proofwiki.org/wiki/Conservation_of_Angular_Momentum
Oct
12
comment Equivalences and derivations in Newtonian/Classical Mechanics
Thanks. I thought conservation of momentum is a derivation of the second law (which just state the sum of all momenta doesn't change), and that conservation of angular momentum is a consequence of the third law (e.g. the proof in wikiproof).
May
28
comment Symmetry of the stress tensor
I'll try. Also see the clarification to my question, if you haven't already.
May
28
comment Symmetry of the stress tensor
Thanks - the Gurtin explanation sounds promising. Can you write some more details, or alternatively link to the relevant parts of the book?
May
28
comment Symmetry of the stress tensor
Thanks for the comment. I'm not sure this answers my question - I edited it for clarification.
May
19
comment Symmetry of the stress tensor
While I can convert them when I have a metric, I still think there is a distinction in the way to think about them. This is particularly true when generalizing to SR or GR, where they don't have the same coordinates.
May
4
comment Why is the (nonrelativistic) stress tensor linear and symmetric?
The stress tensor is a function a given $n$ to $T(n)$. The equality you are describing refers to integration over a surface $S$ with varying $n$s. How from that equation over general $n$s I get some reasoning about a given $n$? Thanks!
May
3
comment Why is the (nonrelativistic) stress tensor linear and symmetric?
I like the method in this answer, but still missing some details. In the first part, is there implicit summation over $j$? More importantly, a volume element with surface $S$ has a changing $n$; how does the stress tensor enter this calculation?
Jan
9
comment Good book for Analytical Mechanics
This book explicitly deals with differential geometry, which I would like to avoid.
Apr
3
comment Photon hitting an atom with higher energy than needed to ionize
So will the photon be absorbed completely and the electron will have the excessive energy (as kinetic energy)?