Reputation
1,809
Top tag
Next privilege 2,000 Rep.
Edit questions and answers
Badges
1 20 37
Impact
~96k people reached

Apr
19
comment What is wrong with the De Broglie–Bohm theory a.k.a “Causal Interpretation” of quantum theory?
@dmckee Clarification: as OP of earlier question, I had asked a plain question to correct my understanding from a reading. It did not ask for a philosophical discussion, and what happened later was really beyond me.
Apr
19
comment Phonons in non-crystalline media
@anna v it is incorrect that frequency can take Any value.
Apr
19
answered Need some help interpreting a formula inspired from Coulomb's law
Apr
18
revised How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
added 87 characters in body
Apr
18
comment If I put a ping pong ball in a vacuum, would it pop?
@NickLarsen I think it will pop. Check edit in my answer.
Apr
18
comment If I put a ping pong ball in a vacuum, would it pop?
@NickLarsen now that will involve quantitative calculations. You must know the tensile strength of the material that makes the shell of ball. If the pressure inside is approximately atmospheric so it doesn't collapse or pop in air, then you would need to know the pressure of the partial vacuum (0 Torr in case of full vacuum, if that's possible), and find if the material can withstand such a pressure difference. In general, you can safely say that normal materials such as plastic wouldn't withstand the pressure gradients between say, a sputter ion vacuum on one side and air.
Apr
18
comment If I put a ping pong ball in a vacuum, would it pop?
if it has air inside, yes.
Apr
18
revised How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
added 4 characters in body; added 36 characters in body
Apr
18
awarded  Promoter
Apr
18
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
@David actually i corrected that factor after seeing your comment. I was copy pasting my intitial equation's latex to be quicker, and I had left the $i\hbar$ factor sticking to the $\partial_t(\cdots)$ so thanks :-P
Apr
18
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
@David yup.. done!
Apr
18
revised How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
deleted 21 characters in body
Apr
18
revised How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
added 888 characters in body
Apr
18
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
@David Ok. I will work out the steps for full scrutiny in another edit.
Apr
18
revised How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
added 116 characters in body; added 7 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body
Apr
18
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
@Marek sorry for dragging you back to this concerning a retrospective doubt. But i noticed that the quantity $\rho$ appeared to satisfy the continuity equation, and the interpretation says that it must be the probability density, albeit some strange kind of probability density.
Apr
18
revised How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
added 731 characters in body
Apr
16
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
I get it. Thanks. I was confused because I tried to technically interpret the word correlation.
Apr
16
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
@marek then what would be an integral representation of $P_{1 \to 2} = {\left \Vert \left < \psi_1 | \psi_2 \right > \right \Vert^2 \over \left \Vert \psi_1 \right \Vert^2 \left \Vert \psi_2 \right \Vert^2}$
Apr
15
comment How do I correctly interpret $\rho = \psi_1^* \psi_2$?
@Marek thanks. one further question, does it make sense to say that $dP_{1\rightarrow 2} = \int (\psi_1^* \psi_2)^* \psi_1^* \psi_2 d^3r$... what does a probability of transition mean in a small volume element. Because states usually means a specifications of the values of $\psi$ in all points in space.. then how can we have a probability of state transition in a small volume??