# Dimensio1n0

less info
reputation
41538
bio website psiepsilon.wikia.com location abhimanyu.ps@outlook.com age 16 member for 2 years, 7 months seen yesterday profile views 7,983

I'm active on http://physicsoverflow.org, which includes a graduate-level+ discussion forum as well as a community peer review system (disclosure: I moderate the site, and was among the co-founders.)

I am not so active here any longer, mostly due to the censorious moderation and irrevocable network-wide policies that I don't consider useful for an academic community.

# 4,203 Actions

 1d awarded Popular Question Nov 19 comment Full form of the Pauli-Fierz action There's an answer at PhysicsOverflow. Nov 18 revised Why does string theory require 9 dimensions of space and one dimension of time? added 29 characters in body Nov 7 comment Boundary stress-energy tensor form ADS/CFT There is an answer at PhysicsOverflow. Oct 13 revised How to learn physics? deleted 575 characters in body Oct 13 revised How to learn physics? deleted 575 characters in body Oct 9 comment Why does light always travel in a straight line? @MBN Of course. I was only responding to the questioner, who probably wasn't referring to geodesics. Or so I guess. Sep 9 comment Stone dropped from a moving train For both questions, because the stone isn't accelerating - it's moving horizontally at the same speed as that of the train when the stone was dropped, but acceleration would require a constant force being applied on it. Aug 18 revised What S means in S-duality? S-duality is not exclusive to string theory. Aug 18 comment What S means in S-duality? S-duality is a duality between strong coupling and weak coupling, so I'd guess it comes from the "strong", as in "strong-weak". Aug 9 comment In string-net condensation, what does the quantized charge means? I don't think there is anything unclear about this question. Regarding the first question - As explained here by Xiao-Gang Wen, it has to do with the boundary of the string being discrete. Jul 24 revised Why there is no Gibb's phenomenon in QM? deleted 202 characters in body Jun 30 comment Why are there no branes in heterotic string theory? Actually, there are branes in heterotic string theory, but they just don't behave as boundary conditions for fundamental strings. See here for an answer. Jun 29 awarded Pundit Jun 20 comment Quantum mechanic particle @Qmechanic Are you sure you meant to add the "supersymmetry" (or for that matter, "operators") tag here? Jun 20 comment What equation do we use to measure the energy level of a string, to determine it's “particle correlation” @CuriousOne That's not true - the MSSM is found in many string vacua. The "lack of progress with it in particle physics" is a different, and historical issue. String theory currently is formulated very differently from its origins in QCD. Jun 20 comment What equation do we use to measure the energy level of a string, to determine it's “particle correlation” (contd.) and then use the mass ratios from the mass spectrum to compute the mass of other particles. Jun 20 comment What equation do we use to measure the energy level of a string, to determine it's “particle correlation” The mass spectrum string theory is just $m=\sqrt{N-a}$ (in appropriate natural units), where $N$ is the so-called "number operator" that takes non-negative integer and half-integer values. $a$ is 1 in the bosonic string theory, and 0 or 1/2, depending on the sector, for superstrings. Of course, the natural units involve setting the string length to 1, so the mass spectrum actually only allows the calculation of mass ratios, obtaining the mass in S.I. units would need experimental measurement (existing experimental measurement is enough. You can just use, e.g. the mass of the electron, (contd.) Jun 19 comment Particle position and speed Woah, this is one confused question. The wave in question is a probability amplitude. It has nothing to do with the momentum of the particle being zero or non-zero. Apr 25 comment In an elastic collision, can we choose between cons. of energy and cons. of momentum? Both are conserved in elastic collisions. Not sure what you mean by "choose" - you simply use whatever's important to find out whatever you want to find out. A general elastic collision with known masses and initial velocities is usually solved with both.