13,254 reputation
21639
bio website
location
age
visits member for 4 years, 3 months
seen 12 hours ago

Feb
18
answered Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance in gauge theories
Feb
1
awarded  research-level
Jan
26
awarded  Enlightened
Jan
26
awarded  Nice Answer
Dec
30
comment Path integral with zero energy modes
@Greg I can't see your E-mail, instead I placed the copy in a file exchange server, fileconvoy.com/… where it will be abailable in the next 7 days
Dec
28
comment Path integral with zero energy modes
@Greg, 1) The unitary transformation U does not need to preserve $\mathrm{ker}(D)$, sorry for not emphasizing that one must project on the top form after performing the action, because the top form subspace is one dimensional. I'll try to add in a few days an explicit computation of the scalar multiple and the cocycle condition. 2) I'll be happy to help if you need me to send a copy of the article.
Dec
26
answered Path integral with zero energy modes
Dec
23
comment Classical vs. Quantum use of the spin 4-vector
Sorry for the late response, I added an update explaining the ultra-relativistic case.
Dec
23
revised Classical vs. Quantum use of the spin 4-vector
added 1138 characters in body
Dec
21
comment Classical vs. Quantum use of the spin 4-vector
The boost transformation of the spatial components of the Pauli Lubanski vector is the third equation copied from the reference article. For a massive particle, the spin is the value of the spatial component vector at its rest frame. Knowing the momentum and the Pauli-Lubanski vector, one can perform a boost to a frame where the particle is at rest and get its spin. In a frame where the particle is not at rest the spatial components of the Pauli Lubanski vector still satisfy the spin commutation relations since they are composed from the spin and an angular momentum, thus should be quantized.
Dec
20
comment Classical vs. Quantum use of the spin 4-vector
Basically, yes, but please notice that the spatial spin components in the rest frame satisfy the angular momentum commutation relations, and the x and z components cannot be measured simultinuously. Thus the numerical values of the Pauli- Lubanski vector should be understood as expectations.
Dec
19
revised Classical vs. Quantum use of the spin 4-vector
added 1 characters in body
Dec
19
answered Classical vs. Quantum use of the spin 4-vector
Dec
13
revised few fermions in a harmonic trap — position density matrix from diagrammatics
edited body
Dec
13
answered few fermions in a harmonic trap — position density matrix from diagrammatics
Dec
11
comment Beyond WKB approximation for energies
@Emilio You may find these lecture note by B.C. Hall useful: math.cinvestav.mx/~NorteSur/Taller10/notas/Hall.pdf
Dec
10
answered Beyond WKB approximation for energies
Dec
6
awarded  Necromancer
Dec
3
answered Other Gross-Neveu like theories?
Nov
27
answered Hawking Radiation from the WKB Approximation