146 reputation
7
bio website
location
age
visits member for 4 months
seen May 30 at 9:19
stats profile views 180

May
22
revised Path Integrals Page Peskin
deleted 30 characters in body; edited title
May
9
comment Contracting the Riemann tensor issues, p540 hobson
it is not but i have done it now anyway
May
2
comment Singularities in Schwarzchild space-time
yeah thx, so would it be r=0 geometric and then r=2GM co-oridante
May
1
comment Singularities in Schwarzchild space-time
Is the singulatiry when the coeficient goes to $\infty$ so at r=0 and at infinity?
May
1
asked Singularities in Schwarzchild space-time
Apr
28
revised Discretization of action in path integral
added 2 characters in body
Apr
28
comment Discretization of action in path integral
I thinks so, does this mean that $k\Delta t=t$?, Sorry i didnt put this in but it is actually $S=T-V dt$ not $dx$
Apr
28
comment Discretization of action in path integral
Im sorry I don't follow from maths line 2 to 3 why has the denominator disappeared?
Apr
27
asked Discretization of action in path integral
Apr
19
revised Poles bit in a propagator
deleted 478 characters in body
Apr
19
revised Path Integrals Page Peskin
deleted 610 characters in body
Apr
19
accepted Poles bit in a propagator
Apr
19
comment Poles bit in a propagator
Thanks I get it now
Apr
19
comment Poles bit in a propagator
Sorry I am getting muddled with conventions firstly is $E_{p}^{2}=m^{2}+p^{2}_{i}$, also shouldn't the exponentials have a $p$ not an $E_{p}$, I don't really see why there is a $p^{2}-m^{2}$, sorry for being awkwrd
Apr
19
comment Poles bit in a propagator
sorry I am still a bit confused, I dont see how you did the last integral. I realise that p can be split into $p^{0}$ and its spatial terms but i stil cant see how to do the last integral
Apr
19
asked Poles bit in a propagator
Apr
18
asked Path Integrals Page Peskin
Apr
11
asked What does Planck/WMAP/COBE actually measure when studying the CMB?
Apr
8
awarded  Disciplined
Apr
8
comment Contracting the Riemann tensor issues, p540 hobson
surely though the $g^{\alpha \rho}$ takes away this index? If not thewn is $g_{\sigma\alpha}g^{\alpha rho} \Gamma^{\sigma}_{\mbox{ }\mu \rho}=\Gamma^{\rho}_{\mbox{ }\mu \rho}$