network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | Jan 15 at 1:28 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Jan 12 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jan 12 |
accepted | SU(3) gauge invariance in QCD |
|
Jan 12 |
comment |
SU(3) gauge invariance in QCD Uhm, I think I sorted out... Most probably I missed a commutator in the interaction term, which accounts for an extra term in the transformation of G. More important, as you suggested I should keep everything to first order, that should be the way to transform correctly the field strength tensor. I still don't know how exactly, but now I should be on the right way... Dropping the problem now for lack of time, but at least I saw the light at the end of the tunnel. Thank you. |
|
Jan 11 |
comment |
SU(3) gauge invariance in QCD Can you elaborate the expansion? Is the usual expression for the derivative of an exponential not valid for matrix exponentials? |
|
Jan 11 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jan 11 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jan 11 |
revised |
SU(3) gauge invariance in QCD added 10 characters in body |
|
Jan 11 |
asked | SU(3) gauge invariance in QCD |
