meta user
network profile
| bio | website | migdal.wikidot.com/en |
|---|---|---|
| location | Castelldefels, Spain | |
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 6 months |
| seen | 2 days ago | |
| stats | profile views | 525 |
A PhD student in Theoretical Quantum Optics at ICFO. Alumnus of Physics and Mathematics at the University of Warsaw. Interested in quantum optics & quantum information, applied optics and mathematical modeling in psychology. Dedicated to education of gifted schoolchildren (as both tutor and organizer). In free time enjoys photography, hiking and psychology (esp. cognitive science).
|
May 16 |
accepted | Name of a state with $d-1$ excitations, distributed uniformly among $n$ qudits |
|
May 8 |
answered | Name of a state with $d-1$ excitations, distributed uniformly among $n$ qudits |
|
Apr 26 |
revised |
Name of a state with $d-1$ excitations, distributed uniformly among $n$ qudits W expanded |
|
Apr 26 |
asked | Name of a state with $d-1$ excitations, distributed uniformly among $n$ qudits |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
Many body quantum states analyzed as probabilistic sequences Well, "sequence properties" is vague, as it is still an open-ended question (I was thinking about something in line of correlations between particles (esp. adjacent), e.g. in the line of arxiv.org/abs/0812.5079). Thanks for your reference. |
|
Apr 10 |
comment |
Many body quantum states analyzed as probabilistic sequences True, Matrix Product States are in some sense a hidden Markov process for quantum states. And here, in fact, I am interested how many sequence properties are preserved (or lost) when converting amplitudes to probabilities. |
|
Apr 3 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Theoretical penetration limit for evanescent waves @daaxix I don't claim that your approach is wrong. But I don't see result "a measure of penetration depth≤f(transversal beam size,n)" or proof that there isn't such. |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Theoretical penetration limit for evanescent waves @daaxix I don't understand your point. There is nothing QM here - pure Maxwell equations / wave physics (here we consider waves of much larger size than any molecules). |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Theoretical penetration limit for evanescent waves @daaxix Thanks for your answer, and for your effort. However, as of now, for me the hardest part is to make a complete proof. I already had a few "things than may result in a proof" or hand-waving arguments. The general procedure is in some sense "obvious" (well, for me Frourier transform is as natural as eating a beakfest :)). |
|
Dec 29 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
System with no entanglement but consuming quantum discord I'm not that deep into discord, but AFAIR some separable states with non-zero discord can be used for entanglement activation or something. BTW: indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/… When it comes to (a) - IMHO the intuition is the following: for mixed states, not all non-classical effects are related to entanglement; there are systems, where with a fixed set of measurements, you can 'transmit' less information than from general quantum-mechanical bound. |
|
Dec 20 |
answered | System with no entanglement but consuming quantum discord |
|
Nov 26 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
Reducing and re-Oxidizing Titanium Dioxide Maybe chemistry.stackexchange.com is a better place for such question... |
|
Nov 19 |
answered | Photon energy - momentum in matter |
|
Nov 14 |
revised |
Is physics rigorous in the mathematical sense? changed title, added tags |
|
Nov 14 |
answered | Is physics rigorous in the mathematical sense? |
|
Nov 10 |
accepted | Kerr geodesics differential equations in equatorial plane |
|
Nov 9 |
awarded | Yearling |
