620 reputation
616
bio website
location London, United Kingdom
age 30
visits member for 3 years, 9 months
seen Sep 4 at 18:03

Phd student


Jul
12
comment How to predict how much data to collect
@Ted Bunn: Yes, in theory it would be possible for me to match the collected data (time-stamped detection events) with a known phase. In practice this may be a little more difficult as the phase is not quite constant and would need regular adjustments. Unfortunately the detector will be place in a somewhat hard-to-reach site so the practicalities of accessing it regularly may prevent me doing so. Regarding whether the events are Poisson distributed, I'm not overly familier with the science/stastistics of RVs, but having looked it up I get the feeling that the event rate here most probably is.
Jul
11
revised How to predict how much data to collect
clarify meaning without changing it
Jul
11
asked How to predict how much data to collect
Jul
1
comment Show that the electric field E in the system at rest is $E=\frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sqrt{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3}} (x,y,z)$
..perhaps. Also, are you sure this shouldn't have had a special-relativity tag instead of GR?
Jul
1
comment Whats the range of dimension exponents in the SI Units system?
A combination of these two pages may be of some use: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix, and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis
Jun
30
comment maximum rotational speed
@Marek's answer in @voix's linked-question seems to answer it for me. Good question all the same :-)
Jun
30
comment how does dynamic casimir effect generate correlated photons
Great question +1. I'm left wondering if measuring the flux of the photons produced could be used as a measure of some part of the vacuum energy spectrum?
Jun
30
comment Does a static electric field and the conservation of momentum give rise to a relationship between $E$, $t$, and some path $s$?
@yayu: indeed, particulry @Andrew's answer and the associated paper. Thanks
Jun
30
comment Does a static electric field and the conservation of momentum give rise to a relationship between $E$, $t$, and some path $s$?
Maybe I'm being stupid but surely if you could consider an object that has no net force acting on it, you would get 0 if you just took any loop integral around it: ∮pho⋅ds=0 What would one call the 'force field' be called though?
Jun
30
comment On a bicycle, why does my back tyre wear so much more quickly than the front?
@bubble: No, it was the incorrect physics that persuaded me.
Jun
30
comment On a bicycle, why does my back tyre wear so much more quickly than the front?
Sorry but there are a couple of incorrect assertions and even more spelling mistakes in this, hence a -1 I'm afraid.
Jun
29
comment Collision between a rod and a bullet
@Willie: I see what your saying, I hadn't thought of it that way but now you mention it I agree that two collisions could be possible.
Jun
29
comment Collision between a rod and a bullet
Interesting question. My 'hunch' would be that if the rod is indeed considered "rigid" (which is obviously not physical) the maximum number of collisions would be one. That said, I'm not sure I personally am capable of showing this using conservation of linear and angular momentum. I'll try a little back-of-an-envelope calculation later this afternoon..
Jun
28
accepted Hail stones in summer?
Jun
28
comment What if the LHC doesn't see SUSY?
Very interesting reading @Lawrence (+1.) @anna I just wondered if you had an opinion on 'proton-driven plasma wakefield accelerators'? See pg 18 on the slides of this recent talk for example: c-ad.bnl.gov/pac2011/proceedings/talks/tuobn5_talk.pdf Could this scheme ever be implemented in the main LHC tunnel in the years to come, and what energy lepton beams might this offer?
Jun
24
asked Hail stones in summer?
Jun
24
comment Why is the decay of neutral kaons (violates CP invariance) seemingly not sufficient enough for certain people to describe matter-antimatter imbalance?
+1 for "..this is a family site." Haha
Jun
24
comment Does particle indistinguishability and quantised enery levels (in bound states) violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle?
@Gigacyan: Sure is, duly accepted. Cheers
Jun
24
accepted Does particle indistinguishability and quantised enery levels (in bound states) violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle?
Jun
22
comment electron orbits
Hyperphysics has a nice exposition on this: hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hyde.html