402 reputation
110
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 4 months
seen Apr 12 at 22:46

The solution is the vertical (i.e. dense) city! In addition to the major nature waster, it solves a lot of aspects of the problem (e.g. forests and heating). What is the problem? Have you ever heard that all your technological advance is based on oil, that is over?

I ask a lot of questions and "I have extreemly low tolerance for the stupid bullshit" (G. Carlin). Yes, beauty is not relative. Particularly, this means that I do not accept bullshit. Circular argument (it is so because it is so) or unrelated details are not arguments. Do you consider this rude? Go fuck. I'd rather offend people than pander to them.

pay especially close attention whenever an idea is being suppressed.

It seems to me that the idiocy is amplified by Fluff Principle here. I consider Stackexchange a best place for challenging the assumptions in popular beliefs. But, I see that people, who are unable to listen, practice ostracism. The bigots from all over the world confer to ignore my argument and preach what they know, the simple minded beliefs. For instance, why don't we have spacedelta in python, why direction makes difference between scalars and vectors, conductor must gain charge when electrons are set into motion, what is the point of accept method in visitor pattern. These are all cases where I ask to argue for the fundamental basics and all are massively downvoted. People hate to know why popular things are like they are! This is bigotry. Or overprotect me(e.g saying that macros are evil).

Stackoverflow: Debugging means localizing the bug. In 99.9% debugging exposes the bug and it is not a subject of StackOverflow. StackOverflow can only be useful if you describe some weirdness and do it very clearly. You say: here is A and therefore must be B. But I do not see it. What is a problem? The code snippet must be no longer than necessary to expose the problem. When user posts his program awhole, he demonstrates that he made no attempt to localize the bug.


Mar
23
answered Time Dilation at zero velocity (and zero gravity)
Mar
22
revised Detecting absolute motion with Doppler (reconciling receiver frequencies)
guessing that f_1(v) = f_2(v)
Mar
21
comment Detecting absolute motion with Doppler (reconciling receiver frequencies)
Yes. We need to add a time dilation (Lorentz) factor.
Mar
21
asked Detecting absolute motion with Doppler (reconciling receiver frequencies)
Jan
22
comment Coherence effect on collecting sun light by mirrors
This is what wonders me and this is what I ask about. How is this possible? You add multiple independent (you may add identically distributed) noises and get non-zero in the sum. Might be you can refer me to the branch of probability theory which says that average electric field is 0 but power (and, thus, electric field) is not because power and electric power is not simple average but is something else, e.g. it can be a variance, since it integrates the squares of the deviation?
Jan
22
comment Coherence effect on collecting sun light by mirrors
The question is why do people speak about source coherence when I ask about coherence of the received waves? I ask you how do you achieve the additivity out of incoherent source. Why do you discuss the incoherence of the sun rays?
Jan
21
comment Coherence effect on collecting sun light by mirrors
@OlinLathrop Alternative energy is largely a hype, I believe. Its purpose is to keep people asleep regarding the oil depletion and global warming so that people would buy more cars and build more urban sprawls. It are supposed to be stupid consumers and alternative energy is fine to keep them sleeping. So, the first image that google retreives, seems to serve this purpose very well.
Jan
21
comment Coherence effect on collecting sun light by mirrors
Yes, that is beside the point. The light is random and at some places you get 0 field, in the others duple field. So, net no field increase and, thus no energy summation. Are mirrors additive?
Jan
21
asked Coherence effect on collecting sun light by mirrors
Dec
21
revised ${1 \over T} e^{-i/T}$ for Bolzmann-Gibbs distribution
fixed the link
Dec
20
comment What is the relation between electromagnetic wave and photon?
This is news because all QM teachers told me that photons abstractions, proposed by QED, which is more exact than wave discription. However, this should not stop us from figuring out how two are related. Actually quanta = particles.
Dec
20
comment Speed of light and relativity
Your formulation is inconsistent. You start denoting the objects by capital letters A and B, use small quoted italics for speed $'u'$ and, afterwards, say that object $'d'$ has speed $c+u$. Do you ever know what consistency ever is?
Dec
20
answered Metric Expansion Of Space
Dec
19
comment ${1 \over T} e^{-i/T}$ for Bolzmann-Gibbs distribution
I wonder why Tom named it Gibbs rather than Maxwell and why do Maxwell-boltzmann distribution looks like Plank back body radiation rather than exponent?
Dec
17
accepted ${1 \over T} e^{-i/T}$ for Bolzmann-Gibbs distribution
Dec
15
comment ${1 \over T} e^{-i/T}$ for Bolzmann-Gibbs distribution
@ComptonScattering Yes, I do not understand why there is $E_i$ instead of simply $E$ or $i$. But there is also partition function in place of T in the nominator.
Dec
15
revised ${1 \over T} e^{-i/T}$ for Bolzmann-Gibbs distribution
minus in the formula
Dec
15
asked ${1 \over T} e^{-i/T}$ for Bolzmann-Gibbs distribution
Dec
14
accepted Black Hole evaporation through virtual couples at the horizon
Dec
14
revised Black Hole evaporation through virtual couples at the horizon
vacuum is not a part of the BH