meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | 8 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 33 |
|
1d |
asked | Ricci tensor of the orthogonal space |
|
2d |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Einstein Field Equations in other space-time dimensions than 3+1? Thank you very much for your comments and answer. |
|
May 22 |
accepted | Einstein Field Equations in other space-time dimensions than 3+1? |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Einstein Field Equations in other space-time dimensions than 3+1? Thank you very much for the very informative answer. |
|
May 22 |
asked | Einstein Field Equations in other space-time dimensions than 3+1? |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Is it possible to whirl a point mass (attacted to a string) around in a horizontal circular motion *above* my hand? @OSE Indeed. Well, it answers the fact that in vacuum, with just gravity and angular velocity there's no way a body's movement can be the one from the second picture. It can't even go horizontal, since, even if the angular velocity goes to infinity (maybe the string is made of carbon nanotubes), there's nothing that cancels the vertical gravitational force... |
|
May 16 |
answered | Is it possible to whirl a point mass (attacted to a string) around in a horizontal circular motion *above* my hand? |
|
May 6 |
comment |
Why does a supernova explode I believe the explanation comes from the creation of a shockwave originated by the collapse of the outer layers into the massive core. |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Theoretical need for Newtonian Gravity @Qmechanic Google always led me to the Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism and I wasn't aware of the post-Newtonian expansion. Thank you for the indication. |
|
Apr 22 |
accepted | Theoretical need for Newtonian Gravity |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Theoretical need for Newtonian Gravity Yes it was this what I was looking for. Thank you very much. |
|
Apr 21 |
comment |
Theoretical need for Newtonian Gravity I had seen the wiki article about MOND before I made the question. Although it's an interesting theory I was looking for something where the Poisson equation were not changed. I mean, some framework or regime where Newton gravity would have applicability. Thank you though. |
|
Apr 21 |
asked | Theoretical need for Newtonian Gravity |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Why is momentum conserved (or rather what makes an object carry on moving infinitely)? @marksyzm This is a really interesting topic that is used thoroughly not only in Classical Physics but also in more advanced topics such as Quantum Mechanics, Standard Model, etc. Symmetries is the way to go so read and ask as much as you see fit. =) |
|
Apr 4 |
revised |
Why is momentum conserved (or rather what makes an object carry on moving infinitely)? edited body |
|
Apr 4 |
answered | Why is momentum conserved (or rather what makes an object carry on moving infinitely)? |
|
Mar 26 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Mar 26 |
awarded | Informed |
|
Mar 17 |
comment |
A very elementary question regarding force of friction @dmckee Now this is a great example of what comes from not reading the answer carefully. Yes you're completely right.Thank you |
