| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | Apr 22 at 18:57 | |
| stats | profile views | 4 |
|
May 16 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Three polarizers, 45° apart Exactly what I was looking for. Thank you! |
|
Apr 22 |
accepted | Three polarizers, 45° apart |
|
Apr 22 |
asked | Three polarizers, 45° apart |
|
Oct 17 |
asked | Adiabatic expansion |
|
Oct 10 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 9 |
accepted | Work Done by an Adiabatic Expansion |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Work Done by an Adiabatic Expansion If I use $pV = RT$, then $p = \frac{RT}{V}$. Using $\delta w = pdV$, then $w = RT \int{\frac{1}{V}} dV$. Solving this gives me $w = RT\ln(5)$, which, after plugging numbers in, gives me $w = (287)(293)\ln5 = 1.35339 * 10^5$. And I was just sent an email saying that the book's answer is wrong and this one is correct. Thank you so much for your help, I really appreciate it (and I do completely get it now)! |
|
Oct 9 |
asked | Work Done by an Adiabatic Expansion |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 9 |
accepted | Work Done in an Isobaric Process |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Work Done in an Isobaric Process Wait -- is it really as simple as $(RT)/P=V$ (which gives me the change since one is 0°)? It would be divided by $p$ and then again multiplied by that, so they cancel out. This actually gives what the book says is the right answer. |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 9 |
revised |
Work Done in an Isobaric Process deleted 14 characters in body |
|
Oct 9 |
asked | Work Done in an Isobaric Process |