meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Helsinki, Finland | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | Mar 10 at 12:30 | |
| stats | profile views | 32 |
|
Oct 6 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Oct 6 |
answered | Linear Algebra for Quantum Physics |
|
Oct 5 |
awarded | Announcer |
|
Oct 5 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 5 |
accepted | Why $\log \rho$ in the continuity equation? |
|
Oct 5 |
revised |
Why $\log \rho$ in the continuity equation? added 127 characters in body |
|
Oct 5 |
revised |
Why $\log \rho$ in the continuity equation? added 132 characters in body |
|
Oct 5 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Why $\log \rho$ in the continuity equation? Heh, yes, the first equation shows that the first equation (written in the alternative, material derivative form), satisfies the first equation. And yes, in an incompressible fluid, the velocity has div 0. But why would someone prefer to express the continuity equation in the log form? |
|
Oct 4 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 4 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 4 |
revised |
Why $\log \rho$ in the continuity equation? edited body |
|
Oct 4 |
asked | Why $\log \rho$ in the continuity equation? |
