1,046 reputation
820
bio website
location Lisbon, Portugal
age 60
visits member for 3 years, 9 months
seen 54 mins ago

The space expansion is the consequence of a shrinking atom, an artifact:
Because we measure the atoms with the atoms (a self-reference, circular def or tautology) and all the equations of physics hold good whatever the atomic size, (ex:check the def of mass unit, kg, as an ensemble of N atoms and the mass of an atom as 1/N of that) you can find a formal proof, with my modest contribution, here:

A self-similar model of the Universe unveils the nature of dark energy

If you do not agree with the offered proof you can justify your position in this post: PSE-How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?.
Note: I've a lot of persistent downvoters and they always refused to write the why they think that I'm wrong, even now that I'm offering 500 points for answers against my position.

I recomend the reading of the online book, written by my friend Alfredo Gouveia de Oliveira http://outrafisica.blogs.sapo.pt

With help of a dialog between 4 characters, and using only standard physics, the author presents an alternative view of the History of the Universe.

In order to be fully appreciated it should be read in chronological order (I'm used to google chrome browser and google reader).

Another reading that I share here is the book of Douglas Pinnow 'Our Resonant Universe'. It is a monography of a model of particles, based only on EM, that has only one parameter ('me'-electron mass) and derives the particle properties to within 1% of their values (barion masses well bellow 1%) and does not suffer of the barionic 'spin crisis'.

papers of my friend Alfredo in the arxiv:

None of these suggested readings has been comented or criticized until now.


1d
comment How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
I'm 100% sure that no one else proposed in the way I'm saying. The consensus never explored what I'm showing. EVERYBODY seems to KNOW that I'm wrong, but NO ONE provided an argument against me. In a simple way: if there is an explanation to the redshift not involving cosmological motion then BBT is rescueless, because BB appears as an explanation for it. I'm giving away my credit (500 points) in an attempt to invite anyone to deny my saying.
Oct
17
awarded  Promoter
Oct
8
comment How do I make an equation to be dimensionally consistent?
sorry, I was late and it is similar to the other answer.
Oct
8
answered How do I make an equation to be dimensionally consistent?
Oct
6
comment Why the galaxies forms 2D plane (or spiral-like) instead of 3D ball (or spherical-like)?
in an initial 3D random environment, the outcome of the collisions do not have a preferred plane, direction. The answers are correct here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/24885/shapes-of-galaxies . Or else there are strange 'pizza makers' in the sky.
Oct
1
awarded  Popular Question
Sep
29
comment How do we know that these radio bursts are from billions of light-years away?
WHY ? : "(In fact, radio waves that are too low in frequency cannot propagate at all through the "emptiness" of space.)"
Sep
29
comment How vacuous is intergalactic space?
Cal univ measure is the Milky Way value. The Universe Today value is the average ISM measure on all the universe. IMO.
Sep
19
comment Questions about the Jeans length
as said: from 0 to the event horizon, (not infinite ok?) ..
Sep
17
comment Do waves accelerate?
electromagnetic waves propagate with a constant $c$ speed.
Sep
15
answered If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?
Sep
10
comment Questions about the Jeans length
see the EDIT ADD in the end of the post. I've explained that the integral is 0. Can you provide a calcul of $g$?: if $g$ is not 0 then a test particle with 0 initial speed will have to start to move. BUT what direction will it take in a featureless landscape? and with what intensity of $g$ ?
Sep
10
revised Questions about the Jeans length
g=0 in the isodense universe
Sep
3
comment Questions about the Jeans length
the [D] Gravitational field due to uniform solid sphere is found in multiple sources, for example the last image at. The image [B] is clear: the isodense field as a null 'g' and the superposition of the field of the hole [C] has to be such that it cancels the field of a sphere, as it does. Or else, explain in better terms why you considered the equation to be wrong.
Aug
25
awarded  Nice Answer
Aug
18
awarded  Nice Answer
Aug
11
accepted Gyrochronology, the formula is empirical ?
Jul
28
comment Active gravitational mass of the electron
the program APOLLO, using improved Lunar Laser Ranging is working in this subject. The results are model dependent.
Jul
28
comment Active gravitational mass of the electron
@rob: the electronic distribution is not symmetric in a large condenser and any possible deviation of the neutrons path (by reversing the polarity) could be attributed to gravity, and slow to maximize the exposure to the field.
Jun
16
revised How to distinguish between the spectrum of an atom in motion and the one of a scaled atom?
on local non expansion