meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 4 months |
| seen | May 6 at 13:28 | |
| stats | profile views | 353 |
Grad student who wonders why he only returns to answer questions here when he has exams.
|
Apr 14 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 7 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Mar 29 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Feb 25 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jan 22 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jan 13 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Nov 6 |
awarded | Good Question |
|
Oct 16 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Oct 4 |
answered | Is it wrong to talk about wave functions of macroscopic bodies? |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
Is it wrong to talk about wave functions of macroscopic bodies? It would still be wrong because you cannot write a wavefunction for an object that is entangled with something else, in this case the environment. |
|
Jul 24 |
comment |
Charges of quarks and leptons @Ron Add new particles? Aren't there constraints on the number of particle generations too? |
|
Jul 24 |
asked | Charges of quarks and leptons |
|
Jul 11 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jun 8 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Jun 8 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
May 10 |
accepted | Branch-point twist fields and operator insertions on a Riemann manifold |
|
May 10 |
comment |
Branch-point twist fields and operator insertions on a Riemann manifold You're right! I stupidly overlooked the fact that correlation functions aren't just path integrals with operator insertions but are normalized to the partition function, at least in the treatment by these authors. |
|
May 6 |
comment |
Branch-point twist fields and operator insertions on a Riemann manifold Reading my question again, I'm slightly amused by how I instinctively use the pronoun "we" instead of the more honest "they". |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Branch-point twist fields and operator insertions on a Riemann manifold added 236 characters in body |
|
May 5 |
asked | Branch-point twist fields and operator insertions on a Riemann manifold |
