1,413 reputation
122
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 11 months
seen 38 mins ago

The following questions (in no particular order) which I had submitted have been "removed from PSE for reasons of moderation":

  1. Which geometric relations obtain between two distinct rest systems?

Consider, as a thought experiment, a set of participants who measure throughout the experiment having been at rest to each other; among them explicitly participants ${\mathbf A}$, ${\mathbf B}$ and ${\mathbf F}$ who determine the ratios of their (chronogeometric) distances between each other as real number values $\frac{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf B}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}}$, $\frac{{\mathbf B}{\mathbf F}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}}$, and $\frac{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf B}}{{\mathbf B}{\mathbf F}} = \frac{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf B}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}} / \frac{{\mathbf B}{\mathbf F}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}}$.

Further let there be another set of participants (of which neither ${\mathbf A}$, nor ${\mathbf B}$, nor ${\mathbf F}$ are a member) who measure throughout the experiment having been at rest to each other as well; among them ${\mathbf J}$, ${\mathbf K}$ and ${\mathbf Q}$, who determine the ratios of their (chronogeometric) distances between each other as real number values $\frac{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf K}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}}$, $\frac{{\mathbf K}{\mathbf Q}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}}$, and $\frac{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf K}}{{\mathbf K}{\mathbf Q}} = \frac{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf K}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}} / \frac{{\mathbf K}{\mathbf Q}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}}$,

such that

  • ${\mathbf J}$ passed ${\mathbf A}$, then passed ${\mathbf B}$,

  • ${\mathbf A}$ passed ${\mathbf J}$, then passed ${\mathbf K}$,

  • ${\mathbf Q}$ passed ${\mathbf F}$, in coincidence with ${\mathbf Q}$ and ${\mathbf F}$ observing ${\mathbf J}$ and ${\mathbf A}$ having passed each other,

  • ${\mathbf B}$ and ${\mathbf F}$ determined that ${\mathbf B}$'s indication of the passage of ${\mathbf J}$ was simultaneous to ${\mathbf F}$'s indication of the passage of ${\mathbf Q}$, and

  • ${\mathbf K}$ and ${\mathbf Q}$ determined that ${\mathbf K}$'s indication of the passage of ${\mathbf A}$ was simultaneous to ${\mathbf Q}$'s indication of the passage of ${\mathbf F}$.

Question:
Is thereby guaranteed that for these distance ratios obtains

(1)
$\frac{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf B}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}} = \frac{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf K}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}}$ ?,

and (moreover)

(2)
$\left( \left(\frac{{\mathbf B}{\mathbf F}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}}\right)^2 + 1 - \left(\frac{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf B}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}}\right)^2 \right) \left( \left(\frac{{\mathbf K}{\mathbf Q}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}}\right)^2 + 1 - \left(\frac{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf K}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}}\right)^2 \right) = 4 \left( 1 - \left( \frac{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf B}}{{\mathbf A}{\mathbf F}} \right) \left( \frac{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf K}}{{\mathbf J}{\mathbf Q}} \right) \right)$ ?

Or otherwise:
What could be concluded if (1) and/or (2) were not found satisfied?


1d
revised How to express Allan variance without neglecting clock drift
(v3.14: trying to optimize the appearance on the http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions page ...)
Aug
26
revised Two clocks along different worldlines
edited tags: adding the tag `duration` ((Note that "duration" is the relevant term being used in at least one answer and in comments by several users).
Aug
26
revised Does the definition of the SI unit “second” require that possible perturbation of primary frequency standards should be measured?
edited tags: restored the tag `duration` (Note that "duration" is the relevant term being used in the OP question as well as in the quote; while "time" is not).
Aug
24
revised Experimental Verification of No Special Frames of Reference
(v3.1459: some formatting.)
Aug
6
revised How should two particles accelerate to have their separation Lorentz-contract?
(v3.14159: Having recognized previous versions as improper, trying hard to be more proper henceforth.)
Aug
5
revised $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ (|Independent particle Model⟩+ |Strong Interaction Model⟩)?
corrected spelling the name of C. F. v. Weizsäcker; cmp. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe-Weizs%C3%A4cker_formula. Also: cheesed up the title.
Aug
5
revised How should two particles accelerate to have their separation Lorentz-contract?
(v3.141: expressing the role of $t$ as an index, rather than an argument, where appropriate.)
Aug
5
revised How should two particles accelerate to have their separation Lorentz-contract?
(v3.14: some grammar fixed.)
Aug
4
revised Relativity of simultaneity example in Resnick
(v3.14159265: corrected order of comparison.)
Aug
4
revised Relativity of simultaneity example in Resnick
(some spelling corrected. Also: inserted one word in order to accumulate the required minimum of 6 changed characters.)
Aug
4
revised Relativity of simultaneity example in Resnick
(fixed grammar)
Jul
25
revised metric-space wiki description
(still proof-reading ...)
Jul
25
revised metric-space wiki excerpt
added 242 characters in body
Jul
25
revised metric-space wiki description
added 1903 characters in body
Jul
25
revised Is there some other name used for “ping rigidity”?
(v3.141: à propos "rigid".)
Jul
25
revised Is there some other name used for “ping rigidity”?
(v3.14: still fixing ...)
Jul
23
revised Are there more distinctive names of “null curves” with certain additional properties (absence of “chord curves”)?
(v3.1415: defined the "cord curves" explicitly as "segments". And specified that the question about "geodesics" is in this case a question about "null geodesics".)
Jul
22
revised Are there more distinctive names of “null curves” with certain additional properties (absence of “chord curves”)?
(v3.141: interchanged the index counts of the coordinate range, to better match the pattern "{ t, x, y }". Also corrected some other inconsequential oversight.)
Jul
22
revised Are there more distinctive names of “null curves” with certain additional properties (absence of “chord curves”)?
(v3.141: put it the missing "t" component ot the example "chord curve".)
Jul
21
revised The Euler equations as a RNG fixed point
corrected spelling the name of L. Prandtl; cmp. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prandtl_number