| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 4 months |
| seen | 2 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 234 |
Relearning physics after more than fifty years.
|
1d |
asked | Quantum Field Theory and Hilbert space dimensionality |
|
1d |
comment |
Why is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle not an experimental error since it is the error created by photons striking on elementary particles? arXiv:1201.5334 is another good Ozawa paper. |
|
1d |
comment |
Why is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle not an experimental error since it is the error created by photons striking on elementary particles? Yes, that's the Distler paper. arXiv:quant-ph/0207121 is one of the best of several relevant papers by Masanao Ozawa and co authors. I didn't mean to imply that Ozawa and Distler were co-authors. Sorry for the confusion. |
|
1d |
comment |
Hilbert space of a free particle: Countable or Uncountable? But then what are rigged Hilbert spaces good for? I thought their whole point was mixing countable and uncountable in a consistent way? A quick look at Wikipedia finds “They can bring together the 'bound state' (eigenvector) and 'continuous spectrum', in one place.” |
|
1d |
comment |
Hilbert space of a free particle: Countable or Uncountable? So the total universe, or at least all of quantum mechanics, is countable? I was once told so by a very famous physicist, but I didn't think that was the majority position. |
|
1d |
asked | Hilbert space of a free particle: Countable or Uncountable? |
|
May 19 |
answered | Radio antennas that are much shorter than the wavelength |
|
May 5 |
answered | Why Quantum Mechanics as a non-fundamental effective theory? |
|
Apr 30 |
asked | What is the difference between Cramer and Vaidman? |
|
Apr 10 |
answered | Is black hole bright at center? |
|
Apr 9 |
answered | What is baryon loading in the context of gamma ray bursts (GRBs)? |
|
Apr 7 |
answered | Are photons deterministic? |
|
Apr 5 |
asked | EPR vs. EPRBB? Why can't we perform the original EPR experiment? |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Is there any experimental evidence to support the Terrell rotation? For this reason, I do not accept the observation of aberration as observation of the Terrell effect, as it does not involve relativistic relative speeds between observer and object, unlike the Terrell effect. |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Is there any experimental evidence to support the Terrell rotation? I believe the Terrell-Penrose rotation is the result of the addition of two effects: One is the finite speed of light, which results in a rotation and is essentially the same as the aberration effect. The second is the combination of the of the Lorentz contraction, and the projection effect, which results in another apparent rotation. This second effect is not present in the aberration of starlight, but explains nearly fifty percent of the Terrell rotation at near light speeds. |
|
Apr 2 |
answered | Interference and which-path information |
|
Apr 2 |
asked | Is there any experimental evidence to support the Terrell rotation? |
|
Mar 17 |
comment |
Why is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle not an experimental error since it is the error created by photons striking on elementary particles? ArXiv search Distler and Ozawa for serious recent consideration that there are in fact two slightly different uncertainty principles, one intrinsic, and one disturbance based. |
|
Mar 16 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Mar 16 |
comment |
Going through a ring of black holes Actually that is slightly oversimplified, but it is approximately correct. |