Alyosha

365 reputation

211

bio	website
	location
	age
visits	member for	8 months
	seen	5 hours ago
stats	profile views	63

	365 reputation	bio	website		visits	member for	8 months
211 badges		location			seen	5 hours ago

summary answers questions tags badges favorites bounties reputation activity

157 Actions

suggestions reviews revisions comments badges posts accepts all

May 6	answered	Have negative pressures any physical meaning?
May 5	revised	Pendulum Wave Period deleted 18 characters in body
May 5	revised	Pendulum Wave Period deleted 18 characters in body
May 5	revised	Pendulum Wave Period edited body
May 5	revised	Pendulum Wave Period added 59 characters in body
May 5	revised	Pendulum Wave Period added 59 characters in body
May 5	answered	Pendulum Wave Period
May 4	awarded	Talkative
Apr 15	accepted	How much refraction occurs as a fraction of all reflection and refraction?
Apr 14	revised	How much refraction occurs as a fraction of all reflection and refraction? added 25 characters in body
Apr 14	asked	How much refraction occurs as a fraction of all reflection and refraction?
Apr 14	revised	How much effect does the Bernoulli effect have on lift? added 141 characters in body
Mar 12	comment	How is Gauss' Law (integral form) arrived at from Coulomb's Law, and how is the differential form arrived at from that? Thank you, Qmechanic.
Mar 12	comment	How is Gauss' Law (integral form) arrived at from Coulomb's Law, and how is the differential form arrived at from that? I intuit equation (2), but why cube $\delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r_i})$?
Mar 12	accepted	Proof that flux through a surface is independent of the inner objects' arrangement
Mar 12	comment	Proof that flux through a surface is independent of the inner objects' arrangement @joshphysics Thank you; yes I do. It's finally clicked where that derivation fits in to the derivation of Gauss' Law. Thank you all for the patience!
Mar 11	revised	Proof that flux through a surface is independent of the inner objects' arrangement edited body
Mar 11	comment	Proof that flux through a surface is independent of the inner objects' arrangement I'm happy that the divergence theorem holds for general surfaces, but not $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{g}= - \rho G 4 \pi$ that needs to be put into the divergence theorem to get Gauss' Law.
Mar 11	revised	Proof that flux through a surface is independent of the inner objects' arrangement added 350 characters in body
Mar 11	revised	Proof that flux through a surface is independent of the inner objects' arrangement added 149 characters in body