| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | Nov 9 '12 at 11:23 | |
| stats | profile views | 19 |
|
Aug 22 |
comment |
Atomic Coherence(Polarization) of Two Dipole-Dipole Coupled Atoms Or, maybe I am misleading even from the beginning and creating a bias in your answers. Getting a spectrum by fourier transform makes much more sense now, because states of the atoms will be entangled during non-unitary evolution and will even be mixed(a reminder from friend named Juan). Thus, it's nonsense to talk about individual coherences. |
|
Aug 22 |
revised |
Atomic Coherence(Polarization) of Two Dipole-Dipole Coupled Atoms deleted 30 characters in body |
|
Aug 22 |
revised |
Atomic Coherence(Polarization) of Two Dipole-Dipole Coupled Atoms added 9 characters in body |
|
Aug 22 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Aug 22 |
revised |
Atomic Coherence(Polarization) of Two Dipole-Dipole Coupled Atoms deleted 342 characters in body |
|
Aug 22 |
asked | Atomic Coherence(Polarization) of Two Dipole-Dipole Coupled Atoms |