Reputation
527
Next privilege 1,000 Rep.
Create new tags
Badges
4 12
Impact
~12k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 22 votes cast
18h
awarded  Notable Question
Feb
15
comment Are there more unconfirmed GR predictions?
@DmitryhandmetheKalashnikov It seems that a reasonable definition for "prediction" is something that a theory says should occur. As far as I know, general relativity doesn't say wormholes should occur, so they wouldn't be a prediction. Maybe you disagree with this definition, but I suspect this is standard usage.
Dec
11
awarded  Popular Question
Aug
17
answered Lagrangian from Path Integral
Aug
15
comment Unitarily Inequivalent Representations
With regards to the "why they aren't unitary equivalent" question, I meant why does this mean that there can't be a unitary map $U$ between the Hilbert spaces that defines a unitary equivalence, as defined as in the Wikipedia page on Haag's theorem.
Aug
14
comment Unitarily Inequivalent Representations
In fact haven't they really just shown that there is no nonzero state $|0(\theta)\rangle$ such that $a_k(\theta)|0(\theta)\rangle=0\,?$ If the two Hilbert spaces are different then how could you even write $a_k(\theta)=a_k+\theta_k\,?$
Aug
14
comment Unitarily Inequivalent Representations
This is interesting. I find it a bit weird that you say $|0(\theta)\rangle$ lies outside the Hilbert space built on the original vacuum $|0\rangle;$ if it is true how you could even take the inner product of states living in different Hilbert spaces? I guess you mean the original Hilbert space, whatever it is, decomposes into a direct sum of Hilbert spaces, one which is generated by $|0\rangle$ and the other by $|0(\theta)\rangle\,...$ I am still unsure why they aren't unitarily equivalent though. Why couldn't there be a unitary transformation $U$ such that $a_k=U^{\dagger}a_k(\theta)U\,?$
Aug
14
asked Unitarily Inequivalent Representations
Jul
24
revised Can the Born rule be derived?
added 816 characters in body
Jul
24
comment Can the Born rule be derived?
@JohnRennie Actually I did see the other link and I thought that either my question had a subtle difference or that it was unresolved. I am not interested in a derivation of the Born rule that follows necessarily from unitary time evolution, only that it follows from something. Prathyush's comment on the original post describes more or less how I am feeling about it.
Jul
24
revised Can the Born rule be derived?
deleted 65 characters in body
Jul
24
asked Can the Born rule be derived?
Jul
14
comment Vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude confusion
@0celo7 I basically just quoted him. He doesn't really say anything else.
Jul
14
comment Vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude confusion
@0celo7 It's the vacuum (in the moving frame) in the presence of a source.
Jul
14
comment Vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude confusion
@0celo7 Hm but Ryder does.
Jul
14
comment Vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude confusion
@0celo7 I thought about that, but in the first link I posted, inside the integral they put precisely one J and it seems to be on purpose.
Jul
14
comment Vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude confusion
@0celo7 What about here? They say $|0,t\rangle^J$ is the vacuum in the presence of a source: books.google.ca/…
Jul
14
asked Vacuum to vacuum transition amplitude confusion
Jul
12
comment What is $\phi(x)|0\rangle$?
@WeatherReport I'm not sure what the commutation relations have to do with this. But according to everything I've seen, the states aren't orthogonal at equal times.
Jul
12
revised What is $\phi(x)|0\rangle$?
edited body