1,882 reputation
728
bio website edwardfhughes.wordpress.com
location
age
visits member for 2 years
seen 10 hours ago

I'm a PhD student at Queen Mary, University of London. I'm interested in modern approaches to scattering amplitudes, in particular twistor methods and integrability.


2d
comment Clarification of Tensor, Jacobian
Glad to be of help! If this answer clear everything up then you should accept it by clicking the green tickmark on the left hand side. This helps keep the site clean!
Aug
18
answered Clarification of Tensor, Jacobian
Aug
1
revised Stability of D-Branes and Coupling to Fields
added extra research
Aug
1
asked Stability of D-Branes and Coupling to Fields
Jul
25
awarded  Yearling
Jul
18
awarded  Enthusiast
Jul
2
awarded  Inquisitive
Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Jun
25
awarded  Popular Question
Jun
18
awarded  Nice Question
May
17
comment Why isn't it $E \approx 27.642 \times mc^2$?
@ChrisWhite - you are correct that the underlying reason for $E=mc^2$ is just the postulates of special relativity. I've detailed a couple of less terse references in my answer. But I wouldn't say this has nothing to do with naturalness. In fact $E=mc^2$ is a great example of where the principle of naturalness works. Of course, naturalness cannot explain why $E=mc^2$ at any deep level, but it does serve as an intuitive guide towards the formula.
May
17
comment Why isn't it $E \approx 27.642 \times mc^2$?
@badroit - essentially you are right about $E=mc^2$ being surprising if you've chosen units of mass, length and time consistently. I've elaborated on how exactly this works in my answer below.
May
16
answered Why isn't it $E \approx 27.642 \times mc^2$?
Apr
28
awarded  Revival
Apr
24
revised Could you theoretically map the internal distribution of mass in a black hole using hawking radiation?
deleted 42 characters in body
Apr
24
answered Interpretation of Conjugate Momentum in Field Theory
Apr
24
answered Could you theoretically map the internal distribution of mass in a black hole using hawking radiation?
Apr
23
revised Conserved quantities and total derivatives?
Improved clarity
Apr
23
comment Conserved quantities and total derivatives?
Of course you are quite right - I completely misread what you said. Sorry about that!
Apr
23
revised Conserved quantities and total derivatives?
Improved clarity