| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | France | |
| age | 48 | |
| visits | member for | 10 months |
| seen | May 14 at 21:02 | |
| stats | profile views | 177 |
Interested into: -Plasma physics. -Kinetics and non equilibrium statistical physics. -Econophysics. -Financial market modelization. -Mathematical linguistic. -Rumors propagation, mathematical epidemiology.
|
May 14 |
answered | Probability Density Function for Dust in the Colision-less Vlasov equation |
|
Sep 24 |
comment |
Does Nantenna (nano antenna) violates 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? Yes they do have a cooling effect which is even used in some aquarium tank cooling device. And you are right, they require a temperature difference to produce electricity. |
|
Sep 23 |
answered | Does Nantenna (nano antenna) violates 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? |
|
Sep 21 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Sep 21 |
comment |
Show the Lorentz Transformation Matrices Have an Inverse 0∈kerΛ is always true for any linear operator... |
|
Sep 21 |
comment |
Show the Lorentz Transformation Matrices Have an Inverse There is typo: 0≠u∈kerΛ. instead of u≠0∈kerΛ |
|
Sep 21 |
comment |
Why is my speed imaginary? Why don't you just try the conservation of energy. mdvdt=mvdvdR is false. |
|
Sep 21 |
comment |
How does Sol's magnetic field continue to exist at such high temperatures? Actually, I have just read a paper about Beltegeuse. It is not the rotational dynamics that induces the magnetic field but convection cells. |
|
Sep 20 |
revised |
Why do grapes in a microwave produce plasma? Improve formatting and answer |
|
Sep 20 |
comment |
Why do grapes in a microwave produce plasma? @Georg: You would be inspired to check your physics. Rotaional spectroscopy is a field in itself. lsbu.ac.uk/water/vibrat.html |
|
Sep 20 |
answered | Why do grapes in a microwave produce plasma? |
|
Sep 20 |
comment |
Conservation of Energy in a magnet If it takes the energy from the field, then the field is modified and the continuity equations at the magnet surface implies that the magnet's inside field is also modified. It is either due to the dipolar magnetic field created by the steel ball (that was my initial guess in a question I have asked) or by a magnetic domain reconfiguration (the answer I got). |
|
Sep 20 |
comment |
On non-local physics It is indeed a very interesting possible explanation. But if you are new to the field of kinetic theory, I suggest you first read: Generalized Boltzmann Physical Kinetics [Hardcover] by Alexeev, Boris V. |
|
Sep 20 |
revised |
On non-local physics grammar |
|
Sep 20 |
revised |
On non-local physics added 1020 characters in body |
|
Sep 20 |
answered | On non-local physics |
|
Sep 20 |
answered | Maxwell equation boundary conditions on a conducting sheet |
|
Sep 19 |
comment |
Conservation of Energy in a magnet It does not make any sense. Why does a steel ball attracted by an electromagnet takes its energy from the generator and why does it take it from the field for a permanent magnet !! |
|
Sep 19 |
comment |
Conservation of Energy in a magnet That's what I have first thought about, but it does not stand when we compare this solution to the electromagnet's solution. Griffith shows the generator provides the extra work. Magnetic force does not work. |
|
Sep 19 |
revised |
Conservation of Energy in a magnet Better explanation |