Tag Info

Hot answers tagged

11

Yes, X-ray, UV, and even radio-waves ares made of photons. The differences is the Energy (or equivalently the wavelength). See the picture of the Electromagnetic spectra . The different nomination comes from the time of the discovery. Youre eyes can see the visible part. the radiowaves can be observes with antenna etc... The only differences is the way we ...


11

Photons do not exhibit the property of virtual particles, but it is not your reasoning that is faulty, you have simply fallen prey to an imprecise use of terminology. Let me start with my view of the wave/particle duality. Most of the images of "particles" and "waves" comes from a time when we really didn't understand the quantum world, and some ...


10

I think I see two questions in your post. Each frequency of light will produce a color response in the brain. However, the brain is capable of perceiving colors that do not correspond to pure frequencies, for example pink, cyan, and brown. These are produced by combinations of frequencies which the brain boils down to a single color. The statement that ...


8

The cosmic microwave background has a redshift of about $1100$, see here for instance. Keep in mind that the "surface of last scattering" that gives rise to the CMB in fact existed everywhere in space, it's just that the photons currently reaching us have $z\sim1100$.


8

First of all, the uncertainty principle is more than just disturbance of observation. From the Wikipedia article "Uncertainty principle": Historically, the uncertainty principle has been confused with a somewhat similar effect in physics, called the observer effect, which notes that measurements of certain systems cannot be made without affecting ...


6

Short answer: A virtual particle is not the opposite of a classical particle. While the other answer captures some aspects correctly, there are still a few flaws and inaccuracies which in the following, I will try to set straight. Wave-particle duality Strictly speaking, quantum objects are neither waves or particles. They are entities behaving like ...


5

Any measurement of the photon's energy (i.e. frequency, or free-space wavelength though making a direct identification of particle properties to wave properties is a little sketchy) will return a single value. Every time. But ... you can't fool Heisenberg and if you have confined the position of the photons---say by insisting that it hit the detector---then ...


4

There are many ways to detect X-rays. I will list just a few that are (or have been) used in medical imaging. Essentially there are several strategies, but it always involves stopping the radiation and using the energy released to effect a change - chemical or electrical - that can be detected. Photographic film. Exposure to Xrays has a similar effect to ...


4

Your observation is linked to the "Optical window in biological tissue". Like you already suspected, the absorption of blue light in tissue is higher than the absorption for red light. Best read the related wikipedia article, where all relevant effects are nicely illustrated. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_window_in_biological_tissue


3

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion converts a single incoming photon to two outgoing photons. I think the article is saying that that if you measure one photon coming out there must be a second photon as well. The author is referring to the second as a heralded photon in the sense that measurement of the first photon is a sign that the second (heralded) ...


3

There are several things that can happen, depending on the nature of the obstacle. The simplest case is if, classically, we think that the obstacle is not too much smaller than the wavelength of the light. Then, the light wave can be reflected, absorbed, or diffracted. Most people are familiar with reflection, the light more or less bounces off the ...


2

In this question I showed that the power received from a light source moving away from the receiver at speed $\beta=v/c$ is $$ P = \frac{P_0}{\gamma^2 (1+\beta)^2} = P_0 \frac{1-\beta}{1+\beta} $$ taking into account redshift, time dilation, and the effect of the changing travel distance for the photons. Your question is essentially the same, except that ...


2

No, it doesn't make sense. Who says the length of the path is 0? If you are talking about the spacetime interval $ds^2$ being zero for lightlike paths, this has no interpretation of this kind. Your whole...story rests on wrong assumptions: There are no frames of reference travelling with a photon This is because the speed of light appears the same in all ...


2

From your question, I guess the double mirror configuration is just an example you thought of. I suppose your question actually is about if a photon can be trapped. Then basically yes. A device able to confine electromagnetic wave or light or photon is called cavity. You should understand a photon does not necessarily means a propagating plane wave. It can ...


2

The electromagnetic wave is composed by a huge number of photons. Photons are elementary particles, they have zero mass, are point particles and their energy is characterized by the frequency of the classical wave we observe macroscopically, given by They do not carry explicitly electric or magnetic fields . Their wave function is the solution of a ...


2

The other big advantage of $\omega_0 t$ is that it is the time dependence of energy eigenstates. Other time dependencies can be constructed, but they won't have such nice properties as $E=h\nu$, etc. The usual definition of a "photon" has it being an energy eigenstate, so in a sense the frequency must be fixed by definition. Other electromagnetic wave ...


2

It's better to think of the deflection of the photon as an effect of its travel through curved spacetime. You can generally choose to analyze the problem in the rest frame of the massive object. In that case spacetime is curved in all directions around the object, and so the photon's path is deflected both as it approaches and as it recedes. If you want to ...


2

Photons generate what we call Radiation Pressure. From wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure, we get the equation: $$ P_{absorb} = \frac{E_f} {c} cos\space\alpha\\ \text{and} \space P_{reflect}=\frac{2E_f} {c} cos^2\space\alpha $$ Where:$P_{absorb}$ is the Radiation Pressure on an absorptive surface (in Pascals). $P_{reflect}$ is the ...


2

With appropriate lab equipment, you can derive extremely narrow pulse shapes. A typical setup involves splitting the incoming beam of light and interfering it with itself. By shifting one of the path lengths, you can observe the change in the diffraction pattern and calculate the pulse width. This won't work, of course, for a single event. For that case, ...


2

The problem with your set up is that you have ignored the quantum mechanical nature of the photons. The photons are subject to the uncertainty principle as well as the electron, and so there is no way to send in 2 photons with precisely the same momentum at precisely the same time, and we can't guarantee they will scatter of in precisely the same way. The ...


2

Any optical fibre - and any optical waveguide in general - has a cutoff wavelength (and therefore a cutoff frequency or a cutoff energy) because wether light is confined in the film region (guided modes) or escapes to the substrate (substrate-radiation modes) depends on the propagation constant, $\beta$, which is related to frequency trough the dispersion ...


2

Light (all the electromagnetic radiations) is something like raindrops-each little lump of light is called photon-and if the light is all one color, all the "rain-drops" are the same size.$_1$ The size makes photons of visible light and other waves different. Credits: $_1$ Richard Feynman-QED, The strange Theory of light and Matter.


1

Does it need to "slow down" to the new speed of light? Or does a new photon get generated? One has to keep clear in this case the difference between a photon and an electromagnetic wave. An individual photon is an elementary particle, its wavefunction is given by the quantum mechanical form of Maxwell's equations and the square of this wave function ...


1

What makes you think an electron reflects photons as you have drawn? Electrons scatter photons in any direction, although not uniformly. (Examples: Thomson scattering, Rayleigh scattering, X-ray crystallography) The electron may absorb the photon for an arbitrary period of time, changing momentum and thus position, then release a photon of a different ...


1

It is a tensor product. (At least it always was when I encountered such notations, I can't speak with authority about SPDC specifically) Let $\mathcal{H}_1$ be the Hilbert space of polarization states for a single photon. Then the space of states for a two photon system is $\mathcal{H}_2 = \mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \mathcal{H}_1$, and the state you consider in ...


1

This falls into the "terahertz band" which has been getting a lot of attention recently. I'm not an expert in that area, but I can suggest you search "terahertz optics". I note that Newport Corporation has a line of terahertz components, along with some notes on their use. And there are many more vendors.


1

It is not hard to imagine a toy universe in which different fundamental forces propagate at different speeds. However, a necessary consequence of that would be violations of lorentzian symmetry, and the ability to triangulate a preferred rest frame. Although I don't see a theoretical reason why these speeds need be the same (I might be missing something ...


1

This is where virtual particles come into play. http://youtu.be/K6i-qE8AigE?t=3m23s Essentially you can think of these virtual particles as temporary photons as carriers that dont exactly behave ver well with conservation of energy. The field is full of these non-conservative carriers for a very brief instant as a function of the mass of the carrier ...


1

Any object that has mass just has a gravitational field around it and light (or particles, photons) just get refracted when it enters this field.


1

This is how an experimentalist sees this part of the question ( the wave/particle duality has been addressed). So, if photons invariably appear to exhibit the characteristics of virtual particles, As described in Frederic's answer, all internal lines in Feynman diagrams are called by a virtual particle's name. In the plot in his answer it is called a ...



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible