The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

4
votes
1answer
230 views

Why is the Wick contraction in HFB or BCS equal to a single-particle density?

I'm trying to understand how in Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) or BCS theory we can write a product of creation/annihilation operators as single-particle densities under the guise of "Wick's theorem". ...
5
votes
0answers
110 views

Functional integral aproach for Feynman rules

I am familiar with the basic ideas of quantum field theory but I feel uncomfortable when I have to derive Feynman rules by myself for a given action (for example in non-linear sigma models or ...
4
votes
0answers
128 views

A particlar normal ordering problem

Say we have an expression of the form: $$ \left<0\right|:\phi(x)^2: : \phi(y)^2:\left|0\right>, $$ where $\phi$ is some scalar field. I have heard the claim several times, that in evaluating ...
2
votes
0answers
778 views

How to prove Wick's Theorem (Zee's eq. I.2 (16)) via Gaussian integration?

I'm working through Zee's QFT in a Nutshell but there's an integral [I.2 (16)] I couldn't quite derive. The problem is to find $$\langle x_i x_j ... x_k x_l\rangle=\frac{\int ... \int dx_1 ... dx_n ...
1
vote
0answers
36 views

OPE of fermionic field bosonization in string theory, in Polchinski 10.3.12

In Polchinski's String Theory Vol. 2, equations 10.3.12 are $$e^{iH(z)}e^{-iH(-z)}~=~\frac{1}{2z}+i\partial H(0)+2zT_B^H(0)+O(z^2)\tag{10.3.12a}$$ ...
1
vote
0answers
33 views

Wick theorem applying to partly ordered operator

I symbolize $T$ as the time-ordered operator and $::$ as normal order symbol. I know that in quantum field theory generally we have: $$T\phi_1(x_1)\dots\phi_n(x_n)=:\phi_1(x_1)\dots\phi_n(x_n):+A$$ ...
1
vote
0answers
100 views

Explicit evaluation of a radially ordered product

I am trying to understand the application of the operator product expansion to calculate the radially ordered product in the complex plain of $T_{zz}(z)\partial_w X^{\rho}(w)$ which should result in ...