The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

3
votes
2answers
166 views

Question about the no-clone theorem

The quantum no-clone theorem states that one cannot "build" a perfect cloning device for arbitrary quantum systems. There also exists a famous thought experiment where Alice transmits information to ...
21
votes
1answer
949 views

Is general relativity holonomic?

Is it meaningful to ask whether general relativity is holonomic or nonholonomic, and if so, which is it? If not, then does the question become meaningful if, rather than the full dynamics of the ...
5
votes
0answers
59 views

Non-Hermitian Lagrangian in Quantum Field Theory

I have seen more than once non-Hermitian Lagrangian densities being used in effective field theories. Usually the problem of unitarity is explained away with decays into some degree of freedom not ...
3
votes
0answers
87 views

How to check the unitarity of the theory by having field equation?

Let's have some field equation of some field corresponding to particles with mass $m$ and spin $s$. How to check the unitarity of the theory? May I do it without getting $S$-matrix? May the scalar ...
3
votes
0answers
106 views

How to show that higher derivative theories (mostly) breaks unitarity

How to show that higher derivative theories (mostly) breaks unitarity? Spinor field $\psi_{a_{1}...a_{n}\dot {b}_{1}..\dot {b}_{m}} $, which refer to the $\left( \frac{n}{2}, \frac{m}{2} \right)$ ...
3
votes
0answers
271 views

Validity of Cutkosky cutting rules for fermions

It is rather obvious for me that the generalized optical theorem (see e.g. Peskin&Schroeder) must hold for S-matrix elements for fermions as it is directly related to the unitarity of the ...
2
votes
0answers
61 views

What does it mean “Hawking radiation is in a pure state”?

I'm trying to understand black hole paradox but I'm not sure if I understand what does it mean "Hawking radiation is in a pure state". Does it mean if Hawking radiation is in a mixed state then ...
2
votes
0answers
47 views

What kind of transformation can be applied to qubits?

I have a doubt on what kind of transformations can be applied to qubits. I understand that the transformations need to be reversible , but they also have to preserve the norm: that's why the ...
2
votes
0answers
104 views

Generalized Unitarity cut of Scalar One-loop Box integral

How does one perform the integrals in four particle cuts in generalized unitarity? It would be helpful how one finds solutions to the simplest case, the fully determined box integral given by: ...
1
vote
0answers
93 views

What exactly is black hole complementarity and why is it necessary for solving black hole information paradox?

What exactly is black hole complementarity and why is it necessary for solving black hole information paradox? The first question is about the story of vacuum fluctuation causing Hawking radiations. ...
1
vote
0answers
24 views

How to calculate resources taken up in quantum computation

Suppose I have $n$ qubits namely $\{|\psi_{1}\rangle,|\psi_{2}\rangle.....|\psi_{n}\rangle\}$. I apply a series of unitary operations $U_{1},U_{2}...U_{n}$ (applied in order) to these qubits. Each ...
1
vote
0answers
62 views

Ghosts in theories of gravity and holographic theories

I want to understand when a theory leads to ghosts in gravity. Is there any relation between ghosts and non-linear higher order theories? Ghost is a clasical or quantum field concept?
1
vote
0answers
143 views

Why is particle number conserved, and what are the bounds on non-conservation?

Think of a modified Mott experiment: You place a single particle in the center of an empty perfect detector. The particle is described by a wave function, which will spread outwards and interact at ...
0
votes
0answers
20 views

Are unitarity and locality properties of quantum field theory somewhat capsuled in these propierties of the action?

Feynman path integral weighs all paths by a factor $e^{i\frac{S}{\hbar}}$, where $S=\int \! L \, \mathrm{d^4}x$ Two questions: Is relatedthe fact that the argument of the exponential is imaginary ...