A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

81
votes
0answers
4k views

Superfields and the Inconsistency of regularization by dimensional reduction

Question: How can you show the inconsistency of regularization by dimensional reduction in the $\mathcal{N}=1$ superfield approach (without reducing to components)? Background and some references: ...
35
votes
0answers
1k views

On the Coulomb branch of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theory

The chiral ring of the Coulomb branch of a 4D $N=2$ supersymmetric gauge theory is given by the Casimirs of the vector multiplet scalars, and they don't have non-trivial relations; the Casimirs are ...
0
votes
0answers
14 views

Dirac Matrix property suitable to finding sets of intersecting branes

So, 11 dimensional supergravity has four oft-studied half-BPS states, the KK1 plane wave, the M2 brane, the M5 brane and the KK6 monopole. To figure out if we can find more solutions in the form of ...
0
votes
0answers
25 views

How can we see that a 4D N = 2 sigma model will yield a 3D N = 4 sigma model when compactified on a circle?

I have a question about sigma models in 3D. If we have $\mathcal{N}=2$ field theory on $\mathbb{R}^4$ and compactify it on $\mathbb{R}^3 \times S^1_R$ (in which $S^1_R$ is a circle of radius $R$) we ...
0
votes
0answers
26 views

Supersymmetry invariants

On page 158 of Fields, the supersymmetry algebra is represented in terms of the action on supercoordinates as $$\delta \theta^\alpha = \epsilon^\alpha$$ $$\delta\bar{\theta}^{\dot{\alpha}} = ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

Intro to Super Yang Mills theory

I'm looking to start learning Super Yang Mills theory. Currently I have studied Peskin and Schroeder up to the Renormalization Group, but don't know supersymmetry yet. I know some Conformal Field ...
-1
votes
0answers
30 views

Why does a heavier mass of the higgs boson support a theory of a multiverse? and what spiritual impications will this have? [on hold]

I'm not a physicist but I do follow this as a hobby. One thing I get tired of in this field is nobody explains why their theories are what they are. I would love to know why a low Higgs mass supports ...
1
vote
1answer
49 views

Equation of motion of an auxiliary field

I'm a newbie in the field of QFT and SUSY, so I'm warning you: this might be a stupid question. I'm working with auxiliary fields to describe supersymmetric models and I understand that upon ...
0
votes
1answer
26 views

Why is the mass dimension of anticommutingcoordinates $[Mass]−1/2$

I am reading a review about supersymmetry and in page 29 I have read that the mass dimension of the Grassmann anticommuting coordinates is $-1/2$. Why this? why don't they have the same mass ...
2
votes
1answer
74 views

Showing closure of the SUSY algebra of a free abelian gauge multiplet

Given the complete supersymmetric lagrangian of a free abelian gauge multiplet $$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + i \bar{\lambda} \bar{\sigma}^\mu \partial_\mu \lambda + \frac{1}{2} ...
1
vote
2answers
123 views

Elliptic genus; What is it within string/M-theory?

What is the elliptic genus (see also Witten index) in string/M-theory and (susy gauge)field theory constructions out of them? What does it tell us heuristically and what is its relation to the ...
1
vote
0answers
23 views

Some questions about Weyl spinor algebra

I am following a review on supersymmetry and I am having trouble with Weyl spinor algebra. These are equations (4.2.1) ...
14
votes
1answer
269 views

Explicit supersymmetry breaking fermion mass terms

I hope you can clear up my following confusions. In Girardello's and Grisaru's paper (Nuclear Physics B, 194, 65 (1982)) where they analysed the most general soft explicit supersymmetry breaking ...
4
votes
2answers
108 views

Viability of a Fayet Iliopoulos term in the MSSM

Why is a Fayet-Iliopoulos term $-kD$ irrelevant or subdominant in the in the MSSM (Minimal Susy Standard Model)? According to Martin (A Supersymmetry Primer, p.70) it's because squarks and sleptons ...
5
votes
1answer
108 views

Basic question about superspace, Grassmann numbers and world sheet supersymmetry

So, I'm trying to read the section on superspace from the book on string theory by Becker, Becker and Schwarz, and I realized that I've been stuck on something simple for a while. Some relevant ...
3
votes
0answers
64 views

A question about genus one string amplitude

In BCOV's paper http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9309140 the genus one string amplitude of a Calabi-Yau 3-fold was explained in the B-model as the Ray-Singer torsion (there is a similar discussion in the ...
1
vote
0answers
34 views

Supersymmetries of the type IIB D3-brane action

The following query is based on a reading of section 2.2 of a paper by Graña and Polchinski. The idea is to begin with the D3 brane action of the form $$ ds^2 = Z^{-1/2}\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu + ...
7
votes
2answers
563 views

Deriving Feynman rules from a Lagrangian for vertex factors for “more complicated” interactions

I am trying to derive Feynman rules from a given Lagrangian and I got stuck on some vertex factors. What for example is the vertex factor that corresponds to the four-scalar interaction that is ...
1
vote
1answer
34 views

Superstring vacuum amplitude on the torus

My question is how to obtain the superstring (Type II A and B) vacuum amplitudes on a torus. They are given in Polchinski's String Theory Vol. 2 equation (10.7.9): ...
0
votes
1answer
70 views

Is time reversal symmetry broken in (conventional) superconductors?

How can one see it from BCS wavefunction and BCS Hamiltonian? i.e. $$H_{BCS}=\sum_{k\sigma}\epsilon_k c_{k\sigma}^\dagger c_{k\sigma}-\Delta^*\sum_k c_{k\uparrow}^\dagger ...
0
votes
0answers
52 views

Kähler Potential of Calabi-Yau volume

At tree level, the Kähler potential is given by (neglecting complex structure) $K = -\ln(-\mathrm{i}(\tau - \bar{\tau})) - 2\ln(V_{CY})$ where $V_{CY} = \frac{1}{6} \kappa_{abc}t^at^bt^c$ ia the the ...
0
votes
0answers
51 views

advantages and disadvantages of using topological quantum computation to study grand-unified SO(10) supersymmetric standard model

What are some references for advantages and disadvantages of using topological quantum computation to study grand-unified SO(10) supersymmetric standard model with respect to other grand unification ...
0
votes
1answer
173 views

Hermitian conjugate of spinors

In any textbook, hermitian conjugate of spinor is defined like $ \psi_{\alpha}^{+}=\bar\psi_{\dot{\alpha}} $ and $(\psi^{\alpha})^{+}=\bar{\psi}^{\dot\alpha}$. We have Pauli matrices ...
4
votes
0answers
41 views

Will the new LHC data falsify some theories? [closed]

There are plenty of extensions of the Standard Model, that all agree until the energy scales that have already been explored, but will differ at the new energy range of 14 TeV. This means the data ...
3
votes
1answer
166 views

Gauge invariance of Rarita-Schwinger action in curved spacetime

The Rarita-Schwinger action in curved $n$-dimensional spacetime is $$ \int \sqrt{g} \overline{\psi}_a \gamma^{abc} D_b \psi_c $$ Here $g = \det(g_{\mu \nu})$, and the indices $a, b \dots$ are ...
1
vote
0answers
36 views

Notation - d.o.f.'s for Grassmann delta functions in a SUSY field theory amplitude

I was reading the following paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.2962v1.pdf as I stumbled upon an issue concerning counting and assigning the Grassmann degrees of freedom that appear in grassmann delta ...
2
votes
0answers
32 views

Meaning of the Coulomb and Higgs branch for non-Lagrangian theories?

What is the meaning of the Coulomb and Higgs branch for non-Lagrangian theories like the $T_N$ theories that arise as 5-brane webs and correspond to CY 3-folds in M-theory? This is related to an older ...
2
votes
0answers
53 views

Questions about the existence of 5d & 6d version of 4d ${\cal N}=2$ SCFTs

Given a 4d N=2 Superconfomal field theory (SCFT) with a global flavor symmetry ( $\mathfrak{f}$ as the corresponding lie algebra), can we clam that this theory can always flow from a 5d ${\cal N}=1$ ...
5
votes
1answer
9k views

Supersymmetry vs multiverse

I'm a complete noobe in physics and quite honestly need help. My question is simple, based on CERN's tentative findings stating the Higgs boson at a mass of ~125 GeV: Is the physics community leaning ...
0
votes
0answers
13 views

Symbolic algebra to obtain equations of motion from supergravity actions [duplicate]

While trying to study the classical supergravity solutions, I realized that there's a considerable amount of intermediate tensor algebra involved, and while it is imperative that I work out all the ...
1
vote
1answer
40 views

Why is the torus important for compactification in string theory? (aka much ado about the torus)

Why is the torus important in string theory and supergravity? To be specific, why does one care about something like compactification of Type IIB or IIA supergravity on a torus $T^5$, as opposed to ...
5
votes
2answers
585 views

Feynman rules for SUSY

This might be an incredibly naive question, but I'm wondering if there are a set of rules for "translating" between Standard Model and SUSY. For instance, if I want want to go from a Standard Model ...
1
vote
0answers
29 views

The low dimensional end of the brane scan

Common wisdom says that only the top dimensional part of the brane scan of Green-Schwarz super p-brane sigma models is quantum consistent (the critical strings and the M-branes). But by the results in ...
1
vote
1answer
39 views

Why does dimensional reduction of 10,6,2 to 9,5,1 have an equal number of supersymmetry?

In general, the number of supersymmetry is different for each dimension since from dimensional reduction, the number of supersymmetry is usually increased. $i.e$ 4d N=1 $\rightarrow$ 3d N=2 ...
0
votes
1answer
49 views

Reference request for supersymmetric localization

I would like to ask for some readable introduction or maybe review of the technique of supersymmetric localization for $\mathcal{N}=1,2$ SUSY theories. I would like a different one than the one people ...
3
votes
1answer
70 views

Type IIB string theory is chiral. Do there exist non-chiral II SUGRA theories?

Type IIB string theory is chiral. Do there exist non-chiral $\mathcal{N}=2$ II SUGRA theories? The answer is apparently yes. Additionally how do we understand the fact that Type IIB SUGRA is chiral ...
1
vote
1answer
40 views

Why do we restrict the maximal supercharge to 32?

Many supersymmetry textbook state that the maximal supersymmetry in any dimension has 32 hermitian supercharges. (Actually for lowest number of supersymmetry $N=1$ the highest dimension is $D=11$) I ...
0
votes
0answers
35 views

supersymmetry in 7, 8, 9 dimension

Why above dimension (7,8,9) the number of supercharge per supersymmetry is equal? $i.e$ For 32 supercharges, supersymmetry in 7,8,9 dimension is describe by $N=2$. And for 16 supercharges, ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

supersymmetry in 2,6,10 dimension

Why the susy has chirality in above (2,6,10) dimension? What i am saying is that for $2, 6, 10$ dimension we can write as follows For 2d : $N=(16,16), \cdots N=(2,2), N=(2,0), N=(1,1), N=(1,0)$ are ...
8
votes
1answer
432 views

Mathematically rather than physically speaking, is there something “special” about 10 (or 11) dimensions?

As I understand it, string theory (incorporating bosons and fermions) "works" in $9+1=10$ spacetime dimensions. In the context of dual resonance theory, I've read descriptions of why that is ...
1
vote
0answers
20 views

How do we use the Killing spinors to determine the resulting supersymmetry conserved?

How do we exactly use the Killing spinors to determine the resulting supersymmetry conserved? Is there some nice "toy" example you could provide me with to see this and convince my self? And is there ...
5
votes
0answers
76 views

Intuition for S-duality

first of all, I need to confess my ignorance with respect to any physics since I'm a mathematician. I'm interested in the physical intuition of the Langlands program, therefore I need to understand ...
5
votes
0answers
72 views

Intuition for Homological Mirror Symmetry

first of all, I need to confess my ignorance with respect to any physics since I'm a mathematician. I'm interested in the physical intuition of the Langlands program, therefore I need to understand ...
0
votes
1answer
68 views

Why 5D gauge theory is non-renormalizable?

My question is following "Why 5D gauge theory is non-renormalizable?" Here I treat $5D$ supersymmetric gauge theories. Also I heard Non-renormalizablity of $5D$ gauge theories implies the ...
5
votes
1answer
151 views

Supersymmetric cancellation of loop contributions in a SUSY gauge theory

It is known that in SUSY models, loop contributions are automatically zero leading to a technically natural solution of the Higgs mass hierarchy problem. In many SUSY books/notes, it is often shown ...
0
votes
0answers
31 views

SUSY preserved by an extended D-brane

There's a nice way to prove that for an extended D-brane half of SUSY is preserved, from perturbative string argument with SUSY Ward identities and the doubling trick (at least, at tree-level and ...
3
votes
0answers
34 views

What information do quiver gauge diagrams provide?

I am struggling to understand what the information one can extract by looking a quiver diagram for a quiver gauge theory is. I understand what quivers are but I cannot get some physical intuition and ...
11
votes
1answer
137 views

Some questions on a version of the O'Raifeartaigh model

This form is taken from a talk by Seiberg to which I was listening to, Take the Kahler potential ($K$) and the supersymmetric potential ($W$) as, $K = \vert X\vert ^2 + \vert \phi _1 \vert ^2 + ...
2
votes
0answers
45 views

Running of the Higgs mu term (or: running of individual mass terms in a complicated mass matrix)

I am wondering how to calculate the (one-loop) beta function for an individual mass term that appears in combination with a number of other mass terms in the coefficients of a number of fields. What ...
2
votes
0answers
68 views

What exactly does it mean to wrap a D-brane or a M-brane in a Riemann surface $\Sigma_g$?

What exactly does it mean to wrap a D-brane or an M-brane in a Riemann surface $\Sigma_g$ ($g$ is the genous)? Is there some mathematical statement? And why do we get various supersymmetric gauge ...