A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

0
votes
0answers
13 views

Viability of a Fayet Iliopoulos term in the MSSM

Why is a Fayet Iliopoulos term $-kD$ in the MSSM (Minimal Susy Standard Model) not relevant (or subdominant to an F-term)? According to Martin (A Supersymmetry Primer, p.70) it's because squarks and ...
2
votes
0answers
41 views

Questions about the existence of 5d & 6d version of 4d ${\cal N}=2$ SCFTs

Given a 4d N=2 Superconfomal field theory (SCFT) with a global flavor symmetry ( $\mathfrak{f}$ as the corresponding lie algebra), can we clam that this theory can always flow from a 5d ${\cal N}=1$ ...
5
votes
1answer
8k views

Supersymmetry vs multiverse

I'm a complete noobe in physics and quite honestly need help. My question is simple, based on CERN's tentative findings stating the Higgs boson at a mass of ~125 GeV: Is the physics community leaning ...
0
votes
0answers
11 views

Symbolic algebra to obtain equations of motion from supergravity actions [duplicate]

While trying to study the classical supergravity solutions, I realized that there's a considerable amount of intermediate tensor algebra involved, and while it is imperative that I work out all the ...
1
vote
1answer
28 views

Why is the torus important for compactification in string theory? (aka much ado about the torus)

Why is the torus important in string theory and supergravity? To be specific, why does one care about something like compactification of Type IIB or IIA supergravity on a torus $T^5$, as opposed to ...
5
votes
2answers
538 views

Feynman rules for SUSY

This might be an incredibly naive question, but I'm wondering if there are a set of rules for "translating" between Standard Model and SUSY. For instance, if I want want to go from a Standard Model ...
6
votes
2answers
438 views

Deriving Feynman rules from a Lagrangian for vertex factors for “more complicated” interactions

I am trying to derive Feynman rules from a given Lagrangian and I got stuck on some vertex factors. What for example is the vertex factor that corresponds to the four-scalar interaction that is ...
1
vote
0answers
20 views

Notation - d.o.f.'s for Grassmann delta functions in a SUSY field theory amplitude

I was reading the following paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.2962v1.pdf as I stumbled upon an issue concerning counting and assigning the Grassmann degrees of freedom that appear in grassmann delta ...
1
vote
0answers
19 views

The low dimensional end of the brane scan

Common wisdom says that only the top dimensional part of the brane scan of Green-Schwarz super p-brane sigma models is quantum consistent (the critical strings and the M-branes). But by the results in ...
2
votes
1answer
33 views

Why does dimensional reduction of 10,6,2 to 9,5,1 have an equal number of supersymmetry?

In general, the number of supersymmetry is different for each dimension since from dimensional reduction, the number of supersymmetry is usually increased. $i.e$ 4d N=1 $\rightarrow$ 3d N=2 ...
35
votes
0answers
1k views

On the Coulomb branch of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theory

The chiral ring of the Coulomb branch of a 4D $\mathcal N=2$ supersymmetric gauge theory is given by the Casimirs of the vector multiplet scalars, and they don't have non-trivial relations; the ...
1
vote
1answer
143 views

Hermitian conjugate of spinors

In any textbook, hermitian conjugate of spinor is defined like $ \psi_{\alpha}^{+}=\bar\psi_{\dot{\alpha}} $ and $(\psi^{\alpha})^{+}=\bar{\psi}^{\dot\alpha}$. We have Pauli matrices ...
0
votes
1answer
38 views

Reference request for supersymmetric localization

I would like to ask for some readable introduction or maybe review of the technique of supersymmetric localization for $\mathcal{N}=1,2$ SUSY theories. I would like a different one than the one people ...
3
votes
1answer
58 views

Type IIB string theory is chiral. Do there exist non-chiral II SUGRA theories?

Type IIB string theory is chiral. Do there exist non-chiral $\mathcal{N}=2$ II SUGRA theories? The answer is apparently yes. Additionally how do we understand the fact that Type IIB SUGRA is chiral ...
1
vote
1answer
33 views

Why do we restrict the maximal supercharge to 32?

Many supersymmetry textbook state that the maximal supersymmetry in any dimension has 32 hermitian supercharges. (Actually for lowest number of supersymmetry $N=1$ the highest dimension is $D=11$) I ...
0
votes
0answers
27 views

supersymmetry in 7, 8, 9 dimension

Why above dimension (7,8,9) the number of supercharge per supersymmetry is equal? $i.e$ For 32 supercharges, supersymmetry in 7,8,9 dimension is describe by $N=2$. And for 16 supercharges, ...
1
vote
0answers
17 views

supersymmetry in 2,6,10 dimension

Why the susy has chirality in above (2,6,10) dimension? What i am saying is that for $2, 6, 10$ dimension we can write as follows For 2d : $N=(16,16), \cdots N=(2,2), N=(2,0), N=(1,1), N=(1,0)$ are ...
8
votes
2answers
416 views

Mathematically rather than physically speaking, is there something “special” about 10 (or 11) dimensions?

As I understand it, string theory (incorporating bosons and fermions) "works" in $9+1=10$ spacetime dimensions. In the context of dual resonance theory, I've read descriptions of why that is ...
-1
votes
0answers
74 views
78
votes
0answers
4k views

Superfields and the Inconsistency of regularization by dimensional reduction

Question: How can you show the inconsistency of regularization by dimensional reduction in the $\mathcal{N}=1$ superfield approach (without reducing to components)? Background and some references: ...
1
vote
0answers
17 views

How do we use the Killing spinors to determine the resulting supersymmetry conserved?

How do we exactly use the Killing spinors to determine the resulting supersymmetry conserved? Is there some nice "toy" example you could provide me with to see this and convince my self? And is there ...
5
votes
0answers
51 views

Intuition for S-duality

first of all, I need to confess my ignorance with respect to any physics since I'm a mathematician. I'm interested in the physical intuition of the Langlands program, therefore I need to understand ...
5
votes
0answers
66 views

Intuition for Homological Mirror Symmetry

first of all, I need to confess my ignorance with respect to any physics since I'm a mathematician. I'm interested in the physical intuition of the Langlands program, therefore I need to understand ...
0
votes
1answer
54 views

Why 5D gauge theory is non-renormalizable?

My question is following "Why 5D gauge theory is non-renormalizable?" Here I treat $5D$ supersymmetric gauge theories. Also I heard Non-renormalizablity of $5D$ gauge theories implies the ...
6
votes
1answer
144 views

Supersymmetric cancellation of loop contributions in a SUSY gauge theory

It is known that in SUSY models, loop contributions are automatically zero leading to a technically natural solution of the Higgs mass hierarchy problem. In many SUSY books/notes, it is often shown ...
0
votes
0answers
30 views

SUSY preserved by an extended D-brane

There's a nice way to prove that for an extended D-brane half of SUSY is preserved, from perturbative string argument with SUSY Ward identities and the doubling trick (at least, at tree-level and ...
3
votes
0answers
24 views

What information do quiver gauge diagrams provide?

I am struggling to understand what the information one can extract by looking a quiver diagram for a quiver gauge theory is. I understand what quivers are but I cannot get some physical intuition and ...
11
votes
1answer
133 views

Some questions on a version of the O'Raifeartaigh model

This form is taken from a talk by Seiberg to which I was listening to, Take the Kahler potential ($K$) and the supersymmetric potential ($W$) as, $K = \vert X\vert ^2 + \vert \phi _1 \vert ^2 + ...
1
vote
0answers
36 views

Running of the Higgs mu term (or: running of individual mass terms in a complicated mass matrix)

I am wondering how to calculate the (one-loop) beta function for an individual mass term that appears in combination with a number of other mass terms in the coefficients of a number of fields. What ...
2
votes
0answers
62 views

What exactly does it mean to wrap a D-brane or a M-brane in a Riemann surface $\Sigma_g$?

What exactly does it mean to wrap a D-brane or an M-brane in a Riemann surface $\Sigma_g$ ($g$ is the genous)? Is there some mathematical statement? And why do we get various supersymmetric gauge ...
1
vote
1answer
33 views

What exactly are the ADE type of gauge theories?

What exactly are the ADE type of (susy) gauge theories? What exactly we mean, intuitively, the ADE singularities? What are their relation to brane constructions and do you have any references one ...
1
vote
1answer
104 views

Atomic structure and corresponding superpartner behavior

If all quantum particles have a superpartner, what happens, if this has been able to be speculated based on theory, to the superpartners when the corresponding partners start forming atoms? Is there ...
2
votes
1answer
44 views

Extended SuSy from the kappa-Symmetry WZW terms

In José de Azcárraga, Jerome Gauntlett, J.M. Izquierdo, Paul Townsend, Topological Extensions of the Supersymmetry Algebra for Extended Objects, Phys.Rev.Lett. 63 (1989) 2443 (spire) it was ...
2
votes
0answers
28 views

Resource commendations for SUSY gauge theory [duplicate]

Does anyone know of recent SUSY gauge theory reviews aimed at the graduate student? Preferably something to bring the reader up to speed?
0
votes
0answers
42 views

Lorentz violation in String theory

First of all, why are there so many researches to find Lorentz violation? Are there some models of (super-)string theory that include Lorentz violation at some scale?
4
votes
2answers
114 views

Wess-Zumino Gauge in non-Abelian supersymmetric theory

I've got a question concerning non-Abelian supersymmetric gauge theories. Consider supersymmetric non-Abelian theory realized on chiral superfields $\Phi_i$ in a representation $R$ with matrix ...
1
vote
1answer
37 views

What does “local composite symmetry” mean in ${\cal N}=8$ $d=5$ supergravity?

What does it mean "local composite symmetry" in supergravity? Specifically, I don't understand very well the local composite symmetry ${\rm USp}(8)$ in ${\cal N}=8$ $d=5$ supergravity.
1
vote
1answer
25 views

Mixing Higgses and sneutrinos

I have a question which might have a trivial answer, but since I am not sure about it I'll ask it anyway. When working in supersymmetric models, one usually has at least 2 Higgs doublets. Assuming CP ...
2
votes
0answers
37 views

Quivers Representations in SUSY gauge theories

I would like to hear some reasons and ideas on how quivers are useful in SUSY gauge theories. There is a nice answer about the case of D-branes here but it is not clear on their appearance in gauge ...
6
votes
1answer
364 views

How can the mass of Higgs give preference to SUSY vs multiverse?

According to the documentary Particle Fever, the precise value of the Higgs boson's mass could give more credence to either SUSY or multiverse theories. If the mass had been 115 GeV or below SUSY ...
2
votes
0answers
51 views

What is the difference between the groups $PSU(N)$ and $SU(N)$? [closed]

What is the difference between the groups $PSU(N)$ and $SU(N)$? For example how is $PSU(2,2|4)$ different than $SU(2,2|4)$?
2
votes
2answers
73 views

Why does the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization for give the exact energy-levels for a harmonic oscillator?

Why does the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule for quantization give the exact energy-levels for a simple harmonic oscillator?
5
votes
0answers
104 views

Questions regarding $D=4 $ ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills

I have some questions regarding the $D=4 $ ${\cal N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory (the one with a really long action which can be acquired by compactifying the 10-dimensional ${\cal N}=1$ theory). I ...
1
vote
1answer
50 views

Soft-Supersymmetry Mass (Direct contact term)

I found this term/operator in some papers that can generate masses, e.g Riva-Biggio-Pomarol(2012), Fox-Nelson-Weiner $\int d^4\theta \frac{X^\dagger X}{M^2}Q^\dagger Q$ Could anyone explain about ...
3
votes
0answers
33 views

Trilinear term in SUSY soft-breaking

In MSSM soft-SUSY breaking, there are such term called 'A-triliear term'. But, some papers, e.g Riva-Biggio-Pomarol, do not have trilinear term. What is the use of introducing trilinear term?
0
votes
1answer
25 views

Chrial multiplet's fundamental and anti-fundamental representation

Here i follow the notation in arXiv 9312104v1 (Witten's Verlinder algebra ~ paper) The usual kinetic energy for a chiral multiplet is given as (In 2 dimensional $N=(2,2)$ supersymmetry theory) ...
2
votes
0answers
20 views

Vev of Energy momentum tensor and $\beta-$ function in a supersymmetric QFT

We know that if a gauge theory runs then the vev of the (trace of) energy momentum tensor is proportional to (possibly sum of) beta function of the gauge couplings. In a supersymmetric gauge theory ...
0
votes
0answers
16 views

which data and experiment prove mirror symmetry

refer from the book by David A Cox, Mirror Symmetry and Algebraic Geometry how to demonstrate supersymmetry eliminate the difficulties of string theories how to use data to show eigenspace (p,q) = ...
1
vote
1answer
81 views

What is the motivation behind the GSO projection in superstring theory?

I do agree that the GSO "works", making the number of degrees of freedom match on the bosonic and fermionic side and that it sweeps away the problematic tachyon. However it is very artificial, it ...