A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

4
votes
1answer
77 views

Where does the “Supersymmetry” in Witten's proof of the Morse inequalities come from?

Where does the "Supersymmetry" in Witten's proof of the Morse inequalities (original paper and outline of proof for mathematicians) come from? Hopefully someone can provide an intuitive understanding? ...
1
vote
0answers
33 views

Representation theory and the Nekrasov partition function

Is there any review or lecture notes on the Nekrasov partition function which particularly thinks of this from a representation theorist's point of view? Some possibly related references I know of ...
1
vote
1answer
41 views

Dimensional reduction of SUSY theories

I know that if one reduces 10 dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM theory to 4 dimensions one gets $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM. There are other examples also. I have two related questions regarding this fact. ...
0
votes
0answers
37 views

Supersymmetric transformation of general Wess-Zumino Lagrangian

I suspect that I might have understood something wrong here. I'm trying to show that the general Wess-Zumino Lagrangian \begin{align} \mathcal{L} &= \int d^2\theta d^2\bar{\theta} K(\Phi^*, \Phi) ...
0
votes
0answers
13 views

Can i use the $y^*$ representation of the chiral covariant derivatives on a superfield that contains both $y$ and $y^*$?

Imagine I want to compute this $$D^{\dagger2}D_{\alpha}(\Phi^*\Phi)$$ where the $D$-s are super-covariant derivatives and $\Phi$ is a chiral superfield. Following the notation of this review on ...
1
vote
0answers
21 views

Which is the analogous of the unitarity constraint of chiral perturbation theory in superchiral perturbation theory?

I am trying to reconstruct something and I would appreciate omeone helping me filling the gaps. To motivate my question let's first consider chiral perturbation theory with up and down quarks. This is ...
1
vote
0answers
39 views

Supersymmetric chiral QCD resource recommendations?

I want somebody to recommend me where I can read about supersymmetric chiral QCD.
5
votes
0answers
145 views

Book with solved examples and exercise problems for SUSY

I am learning supersymmetry right now. I am mostly following Bailin and Love. I try to connect all the steps from the book and complete the derivations in order to get comfortable with the ...
3
votes
0answers
53 views

Projective superspace: why extra bosonic coordinates

I'm studying the projective superspace formalism for N = 4 supersymmetric $\sigma$-models in two dimensions. My question is: why do we need the extra bosonic coordinates for the manifest action? I ...
3
votes
1answer
65 views

Why must superpartners have the same gauge quantum numbers?

The title leaves it quite clear, why must superpartners have the same gauge quantum numbers?
6
votes
1answer
172 views

Invariance of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory under supersymmetry

I was following Brink, Scherk and Schwartz, "Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories". The variation of the Lagrangian w.r.t a supersymmetry transformation can be reduced to $$ \delta L = -igf_{a b c} ...
2
votes
1answer
50 views

What is $\mathcal{N}=2$ QED?

I would like to know is $\mathcal{N}=2$ QED is simply a $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory with gauge group $U(1)$ like in normal QED? If not, exactly what theory is it? Is there some reference for it?
1
vote
1answer
79 views

Should the (On-shell) (2+1)d $N=2$ Chiral Multiplet Contain Two Scalars and Two Majorana Spinors?

In supermultiplets, the bosonic degrees of freedom and the fermionic degrees of freedom need to match in number. The number of degrees of freedom of a field corresponds to the number of independent ...
1
vote
0answers
53 views

(Super)Gauge Fixing in Supersymmetry

I have three questions about gauge fixing in supersymmetry, one is general and the other two explicit: Why gauge fixing seems not important in supersymmetry? By "not important" I mean gauge fixing ...
9
votes
2answers
711 views

Deriving Feynman rules from a Lagrangian for vertex factors for “more complicated” interactions

I am trying to derive Feynman rules from a given Lagrangian and I got stuck on some vertex factors. What for example is the vertex factor that corresponds to the four-scalar interaction that is ...
1
vote
0answers
45 views

Projection that keeps graviton but gets rid of B-field

We consider the closed superstring and the massless states in the (NS,NS)-sector \begin{equation} \tilde{b}^i_{-\frac{1}{2}} |0\rangle_L \otimes b^j_{-\frac{1}{2}} |0\rangle_R. \end{equation} It is ...
0
votes
1answer
203 views

Hermitian conjugate of spinors

In any textbook, hermitian conjugate of spinor is defined like $ \psi_{\alpha}^{+}=\bar\psi_{\dot{\alpha}} $ and $(\psi^{\alpha})^{+}=\bar{\psi}^{\dot\alpha}$. We have Pauli matrices ...
2
votes
0answers
351 views

What is special about a 126 GeV Higgs mass?

The 126 GeV Higgs mass seems to be a rather special value, from all the a priori possible values. One thing I've heard is that it is just at the edge of the mass range implying a stable vacuum, and ...
1
vote
1answer
110 views

Quantum mechanic particle

In non relativistic quantum mechanic, we are dealing with a problem involving a particle in one dimensional space, and it has been given the potential and it reads: ...
6
votes
1answer
11k views

Supersymmetry vs multiverse

I'm a complete noobe in physics and quite honestly need help. My question is simple, based on CERN's tentative findings stating the Higgs boson at a mass of ~125 GeV: Is the physics community leaning ...
0
votes
2answers
168 views

Methods of detecting gravitino DM and possible implications for theories of everything

Let me summarize my thoughts about topics in theoretical physics: Theory of everything: The theory of everything aims to unite all the four forces of nature into one single elegant equation. ...
6
votes
2answers
386 views

Stablising the Higgs without SUSY

Should the Higgs be found at the LHC, but no supersymmetry (assuming for the sake of argument that the LHC be capable of eliminating all versions of SUSY that are motivated by solving the hierarchy ...
1
vote
1answer
353 views

What is the $\mu$ problem in SUSY?

I need a little bit of help in understanding the mu problem in SUSY. As I understand it, the gist of the problem is that $\mu$ must be on the same order of magnitude as the electroweak scale (246 ...
4
votes
1answer
448 views

Hierarchy is no problem and susy is a mathematical tool for data fitting

I saw this paper in the arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4711. The author seems well-known and has many very well cited papers. But what he says sounds very strange. What I get from this paper are ...
0
votes
1answer
64 views

supersymmetry in 7, 8, 9 dimension

Why above dimension (7,8,9) the number of supercharge per supersymmetry is equal? $i.e$ For 32 supercharges, supersymmetry in 7,8,9 dimension is describe by $N=2$. And for 16 supercharges, ...
0
votes
1answer
34 views

Polchinski, (0,0) picture vertex operator

I am currently working through chapter 12 of Polchinski and am confused as to how the equation $(12.3.39)$ for the (0,0) picture vertex operator arises. From the text: The state–operator mapping ...
2
votes
1answer
67 views

Understanding Fierz rearrangement identity

I'm trying to get a better grasp of the Fierz rearrangement identity for 2-component spinors (Equation 2.20 I'll be using the Van der Waerden notionation used in the given link) $$ \chi_\alpha (\xi ...
2
votes
1answer
85 views

Signs of supersymmetry and thus dark matter at CERN

The Large Hadron Collider at CERN has just re-started after a two year pause and is now running at unprecedented levels of 6.5 TeV, with collisions that will release up to 13.5 TeV. With this increase ...
1
vote
1answer
43 views

What is meant by “the superpotential is not renormalized”?

Reading about supersymmetry I often read the phrase because of the non-renormalization theorems the superpotential is not renormalized. I would like someone to be more explicit on what is ...
1
vote
1answer
52 views

Do the Grassmann coordinates in the superfield formalism have any physical meaning?

In the superfield formalism we consider fields in a space who has four so called bosonic coordinates $x^{\nu}$ and four so called fermionic coordinates ...
1
vote
1answer
50 views

Partial derivatives of chiral superfields with respect to scalar components in the superpotential

I am following some notes on supersymmetry by Matteo Bertolini and I need some clarification. Chapter five deals with sypersymmetric Lagrangians and the superpotential is introduced. It is stated ...
0
votes
0answers
52 views

Supermultiplet dimensions from Young Tableaus

In John Terning's book, on pages 14 and 15, there are lists of $\mathcal{N} = 2$ and $\mathcal{N} = 4$ supermultiplets, labeled in terms of the dimensions of the corresponding R-symmetry $d_R$ and ...
85
votes
0answers
5k views

Superfields and the Inconsistency of regularization by dimensional reduction

Question: How can you show the inconsistency of regularization by dimensional reduction in the $\mathcal{N}=1$ superfield approach (without reducing to components)? Background and some references: ...
2
votes
1answer
72 views

Why must the supersymmetry generators be spinors?

I have read in a few places (for example, at page 5 here) that the supersymmetry generators must be spinors. Quoting the reference mentioned The generator of the symmetry must relate two types of ...
1
vote
1answer
68 views

Elementary question about global supersymmetry of a worldsheet [closed]

I'm reading chapter 4 of the book by Green, Schwarz and Witten. They consider an action $$ S = -\frac{1}{2\pi} \int d^2 \sigma \left( \partial_\alpha X^\mu \partial^\alpha X_\mu - i \bar \psi^\mu ...
2
votes
1answer
106 views

With the LHC about to restart as max energy, are there absolutely no hints or tantalizing signs of Supersymmetry in previous data?

Over the last couple of years I've seen several articles talk about hints or bumps in the data that might point to Supersymmetry. An article in NewScientist from Summer 2012 discussed the discovery of ...
1
vote
1answer
43 views

Why we do we consider explicit SUSY breaking in the MSSM and not an spontaneous breaking of SUSY?

Reading about the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) I have found that an explicit breaking of supersymmetry is considered, given by the term $$\cal{L}_{soft}$$ where soft supersymmetry ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

What mathematical structure describes superspace and superfields?

In every book related to supersymmetry I have encountered at some point the idea of superspace is introduced. Superspace is presented as a space spanned by 4 "normal" directions and 4 Grassmannian ...
35
votes
0answers
1k views

On the Coulomb branch of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theory

The chiral ring of the Coulomb branch of a 4D $N=2$ supersymmetric gauge theory is given by the Casimirs of the vector multiplet scalars, and they don't have non-trivial relations; the Casimirs are ...
0
votes
0answers
17 views

Dirac Matrix property suitable to finding sets of intersecting branes

So, 11 dimensional supergravity has four oft-studied half-BPS states, the KK1 plane wave, the M2 brane, the M5 brane and the KK6 monopole. To figure out if we can find more solutions in the form of ...
0
votes
0answers
44 views

How can we see that a 4D N = 2 sigma model will yield a 3D N = 4 sigma model when compactified on a circle?

I have a question about sigma models in 3D. If we have $\mathcal{N}=2$ field theory on $\mathbb{R}^4$ and compactify it on $\mathbb{R}^3 \times S^1_R$ (in which $S^1_R$ is a circle of radius $R$) we ...
1
vote
0answers
36 views

Supersymmetry invariants

On page 158 of Fields, the supersymmetry algebra is represented in terms of the action on supercoordinates as $$\delta \theta^\alpha = \epsilon^\alpha$$ $$\delta\bar{\theta}^{\dot{\alpha}} = ...
1
vote
0answers
67 views

Intro to Super Yang Mills theory

I'm looking to start learning Super Yang Mills theory. Currently I have studied Peskin and Schroeder up to the Renormalization Group, but don't know supersymmetry yet. I know some Conformal Field ...
1
vote
1answer
62 views

Equation of motion of an auxiliary field

I'm a newbie in the field of QFT and SUSY, so I'm warning you: this might be a stupid question. I'm working with auxiliary fields to describe supersymmetric models and I understand that upon ...
0
votes
1answer
30 views

Why is the mass dimension of anticommutingcoordinates $[Mass]−1/2$

I am reading a review about supersymmetry and in page 29 I have read that the mass dimension of the Grassmann anticommuting coordinates is $-1/2$. Why this? why don't they have the same mass ...
2
votes
1answer
87 views

Showing closure of the SUSY algebra of a free abelian gauge multiplet

Given the complete supersymmetric lagrangian of a free abelian gauge multiplet $$ \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + i \bar{\lambda} \bar{\sigma}^\mu \partial_\mu \lambda + \frac{1}{2} ...
1
vote
2answers
141 views

Elliptic genus; What is it within string/M-theory?

What is the elliptic genus (see also Witten index) in string/M-theory and (susy gauge)field theory constructions out of them? What does it tell us heuristically and what is its relation to the ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

Some questions about Weyl spinor algebra

I am following a review on supersymmetry and I am having trouble with Weyl spinor algebra. These are equations (4.2.1) ...
14
votes
1answer
278 views

Explicit supersymmetry breaking fermion mass terms

I hope you can clear up my following confusions. In Girardello's and Grisaru's paper (Nuclear Physics B, 194, 65 (1982)) where they analysed the most general soft explicit supersymmetry breaking ...
4
votes
2answers
118 views

Viability of a Fayet Iliopoulos term in the MSSM

Why is a Fayet-Iliopoulos term $-kD$ irrelevant or subdominant in the in the MSSM (Minimal Susy Standard Model)? According to Martin (A Supersymmetry Primer, p.70) it's because squarks and sleptons ...