A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

1
vote
1answer
174 views

Why is the torus important for compactification in string theory? (aka much ado about the torus)

Why is the torus important in string theory and supergravity? To be specific, why does one care about something like compactification of Type IIB or IIA supergravity on a torus $T^5$, as opposed to ...
5
votes
2answers
762 views

Feynman rules for SUSY

This might be an incredibly naive question, but I'm wondering if there are a set of rules for "translating" between Standard Model and SUSY. For instance, if I want want to go from a Standard Model ...
1
vote
0answers
68 views

The low dimensional end of the brane scan

Common wisdom says that only the top dimensional part of the brane scan of Green-Schwarz super p-brane sigma models is quantum consistent (the critical strings and the M-branes). But by the results in ...
1
vote
1answer
72 views

Why does dimensional reduction of 10,6,2 to 9,5,1 have an equal number of supersymmetry?

In general, the number of supersymmetry is different for each dimension since from dimensional reduction, the number of supersymmetry is usually increased. $i.e$ 4d N=1 $\rightarrow$ 3d N=2 $\...
0
votes
1answer
166 views

Reference request for supersymmetric localization

I would like to ask for some readable introduction or maybe review of the technique of supersymmetric localization for $\mathcal{N}=1,2$ SUSY theories. I would like a different one than the one people ...
3
votes
1answer
102 views

Type IIB string theory is chiral. Do there exist non-chiral II SUGRA theories?

Type IIB string theory is chiral. Do there exist non-chiral $\mathcal{N}=2$ II SUGRA theories? The answer is apparently yes. Additionally how do we understand the fact that Type IIB SUGRA is chiral ...
1
vote
1answer
51 views

Why do we restrict the maximal supercharge to 32?

Many supersymmetry textbook state that the maximal supersymmetry in any dimension has 32 hermitian supercharges. (Actually for lowest number of supersymmetry $N=1$ the highest dimension is $D=11$) I ...
1
vote
0answers
37 views

supersymmetry in 2,6,10 dimension

Why the susy has chirality in above (2,6,10) dimension? What i am saying is that for $2, 6, 10$ dimension we can write as follows For 2d : $N=(16,16), \cdots N=(2,2), N=(2,0), N=(1,1), N=(1,0)$ are ...
8
votes
1answer
739 views

Mathematically rather than physically speaking, is there something “special” about 10 (or 11) dimensions?

As I understand it, string theory (incorporating bosons and fermions) "works" in $9+1=10$ spacetime dimensions. In the context of dual resonance theory, I've read descriptions of why that is "...
2
votes
0answers
48 views

How do we use the Killing spinors to determine the resulting supersymmetry conserved?

How do we exactly use the Killing spinors to determine the resulting supersymmetry conserved? Is there some nice "toy" example you could provide me with to see this and convince my self? And is there ...
6
votes
0answers
123 views

Intuition for Homological Mirror Symmetry

first of all, I need to confess my ignorance with respect to any physics since I'm a mathematician. I'm interested in the physical intuition of the Langlands program, therefore I need to understand ...
0
votes
1answer
124 views

Why 5D gauge theory is non-renormalizable?

My question is following "Why 5D gauge theory is non-renormalizable?" Here I treat $5D$ supersymmetric gauge theories. Also I heard Non-renormalizablity of $5D$ gauge theories implies the ...
5
votes
1answer
182 views

Supersymmetric cancellation of loop contributions in a SUSY gauge theory

It is known that in SUSY models, loop contributions are automatically zero leading to a technically natural solution of the Higgs mass hierarchy problem. In many SUSY books/notes, it is often shown ...
3
votes
0answers
65 views

What information do quiver gauge diagrams provide?

I am struggling to understand what the information one can extract by looking a quiver diagram for a quiver gauge theory is. I understand what quivers are but I cannot get some physical intuition and ...
11
votes
1answer
165 views

Some questions on a version of the O'Raifeartaigh model

This form is taken from a talk by Seiberg to which I was listening to, Take the Kahler potential ($K$) and the supersymmetric potential ($W$) as, $K = \vert X\vert ^2 + \vert \phi _1 \vert ^2 + \...
2
votes
0answers
80 views

Running of the Higgs mu term (or: running of individual mass terms in a complicated mass matrix)

I am wondering how to calculate the (one-loop) beta function for an individual mass term that appears in combination with a number of other mass terms in the coefficients of a number of fields. What ...
2
votes
0answers
93 views

What exactly does it mean to wrap a D-brane or a M-brane in a Riemann surface $\Sigma_g$?

What exactly does it mean to wrap a D-brane or an M-brane in a Riemann surface $\Sigma_g$ ($g$ is the genous)? Is there some mathematical statement? And why do we get various supersymmetric gauge ...
1
vote
1answer
80 views

What exactly are the ADE type of gauge theories?

What exactly are the ADE type of (susy) gauge theories? What exactly we mean, intuitively, the ADE singularities? What are their relation to brane constructions and do you have any references one ...
1
vote
1answer
110 views

Atomic structure and corresponding superpartner behavior

If all quantum particles have a superpartner, what happens, if this has been able to be speculated based on theory, to the superpartners when the corresponding partners start forming atoms? Is there ...
2
votes
1answer
80 views

Extended SuSy from the kappa-Symmetry WZW terms

In José de Azcárraga, Jerome Gauntlett, J.M. Izquierdo, Paul Townsend, Topological Extensions of the Supersymmetry Algebra for Extended Objects, Phys.Rev.Lett. 63 (1989) 2443 (spire) it was ...
1
vote
0answers
34 views

Resource commendations for SUSY gauge theory [duplicate]

Does anyone know of recent SUSY gauge theory reviews aimed at the graduate student? Preferably something to bring the reader up to speed?
0
votes
0answers
92 views

Lorentz violation in String theory

First of all, why are there so many researches to find Lorentz violation? Are there some models of (super-)string theory that include Lorentz violation at some scale?
4
votes
2answers
275 views

Wess-Zumino Gauge in non-Abelian supersymmetric theory

I've got a question concerning non-Abelian supersymmetric gauge theories. Consider supersymmetric non-Abelian theory realized on chiral superfields $\Phi_i$ in a representation $R$ with matrix ...
1
vote
1answer
58 views

What does “local composite symmetry” mean in ${\cal N}=8$ $d=5$ supergravity?

What does it mean "local composite symmetry" in supergravity? Specifically, I don't understand very well the local composite symmetry ${\rm USp}(8)$ in ${\cal N}=8$ $d=5$ supergravity.
0
votes
1answer
38 views

Mixing Higgses and sneutrinos

I have a question which might have a trivial answer, but since I am not sure about it I'll ask it anyway. When working in supersymmetric models, one usually has at least 2 Higgs doublets. Assuming CP ...
2
votes
0answers
61 views

Quivers Representations in SUSY gauge theories

I would like to hear some reasons and ideas on how quivers are useful in SUSY gauge theories. There is a nice answer about the case of D-branes here but it is not clear on their appearance in gauge ...
2
votes
0answers
75 views

What is the difference between the groups $PSU(N)$ and $SU(N)$? [closed]

What is the difference between the groups $PSU(N)$ and $SU(N)$? For example how is $PSU(2,2|4)$ different than $SU(2,2|4)$?
2
votes
2answers
344 views

Why does the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization for give the exact energy-levels for a harmonic oscillator?

Why does the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule for quantization give the exact energy-levels for a simple harmonic oscillator?
6
votes
0answers
191 views

Questions regarding $D=4 $ ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills

I have some questions regarding the $D=4 $ ${\cal N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory (the one with a really long action which can be acquired by compactifying the 10-dimensional ${\cal N}=1$ theory). I ...
1
vote
1answer
57 views

Soft-Supersymmetry Mass (Direct contact term)

I found this term/operator in some papers that can generate masses, e.g Riva-Biggio-Pomarol(2012), Fox-Nelson-Weiner $\int d^4\theta \frac{X^\dagger X}{M^2}Q^\dagger Q$ Could anyone explain about ...
2
votes
0answers
48 views

Trilinear term in SUSY soft-breaking

In MSSM soft-SUSY breaking, there are such term called 'A-triliear term'. But, some papers, e.g Riva-Biggio-Pomarol, do not have trilinear term. What is the use of introducing trilinear term?
0
votes
1answer
49 views

Chrial multiplet's fundamental and anti-fundamental representation

Here i follow the notation in arXiv 9312104v1 (Witten's Verlinder algebra ~ paper) The usual kinetic energy for a chiral multiplet is given as (In 2 dimensional $N=(2,2)$ supersymmetry theory) \...
2
votes
1answer
249 views

What is the motivation behind the GSO projection in superstring theory?

I do agree that the GSO "works", making the number of degrees of freedom match on the bosonic and fermionic side and that it sweeps away the problematic tachyon. However it is very artificial, it ...
8
votes
2answers
191 views

Can a superpartner be less massive than its SM counterpart?

Theoretically, can a superpartner be less massive than its standard model counterpart? I realize there are experimental constraints.
2
votes
0answers
52 views

How well theoretically motivated is $R$-parity?

I understand that $R$-parity is empirically necessary in order to avoid proton decay, but theoretically I'm worried that it amounts to a tune or "hack" that spoils the naturalness argument for ...
2
votes
1answer
141 views

Supersymmetry transformations as coordinate transformations

Usually, a supersymmetry transformation is carried out on bosonic and fermionic fields which are functions of the coordinates (or on a superfield which is a function of real and fermionic coordinates)....
1
vote
0answers
59 views

Forming massive $\mathcal{N} = 2$ supermultiplets

This question stems from page 14 of John Terning's Modern Supersymmetry. Suppose we consider $\mathcal{N} = 2$ supersymmetry, and denote the spin-0 Clifford vaccuum by $\Omega_0$. Now, the non-...
1
vote
0answers
37 views

Why in SQCD $R_{\psi}= R_{\phi}-1$?

In SQCD = suspersymmetric QCD, in 4 dimensions and with one SUSY generator how do we determine the $R$-charge of the $U(1)_R$ symmetry of the various operators in a chiral supermultiplet? Say for $\...
3
votes
0answers
62 views

Moduli space for $CP^N$ and $T^{*} CP^N$ in $\mathcal{N}=2$ SUSY

For complex $\phi$ in $U(1)$ gauge theory, \begin{align} |\phi_1|^2 + |\phi_2|^2 +\cdots |\phi_N|^2 =r \end{align} This equation $|\phi|^2=r$, describes sphere $S^{2N-1}$. Dividing the space of this ...
1
vote
1answer
84 views

Color factor for squark-quark-antiquark vertex

I am trying to do a tree level calculation of cross section in a process that involves sbottom exchange. There is a $ \widetilde{b} q \bar{q} $ vertex, where $q$ and $\bar q$ are quark and anti-quark ...
4
votes
0answers
71 views

Why the bosonic part of the superconformal group $SU(2,2|1)$ is $SO(4,1) \times U(1)_R$?

Why in $d=4$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ SCFT the bosonic part of the superconformal group $SU(2,2|1)$ is $SO(4,1) \times U(1)_R$? More generally how can I determine the such a thing in other theories? Is there ...
8
votes
2answers
668 views

Dynamical supersymmetry breaking and Witten index

Witten index, defined as ${\rm Tr}(-1)^F$, determines if supersymmetry is spontaneously broken or not for a given model. However, it is also known that supersymmetry can be dynamically broken. One ...
3
votes
1answer
96 views

Why do we need frame-fields to describe fermions in SUGRA?

I'm learning about the frame formalism and read that to couple fermions to gravity you need to go to the frame-formalism. As a motivation to learn more about frame-fields would someone sketch me why ...
3
votes
1answer
86 views

Understanding the $\mu$ problem

I am going through the motivation to introduce singlet extensions of the MSSM (like for instance the NMSSM), and of course such a motivation is naturalness. Here, one argues that the $\mu$ parameter ...
0
votes
0answers
51 views

SUSY condition on string theory

In each string theory, there is some condition so called SUSY condition. I want to know susy condition for Type I, Type II, and Heterotic string. Can anyone give some brief explanation about this?...
3
votes
1answer
317 views

Treating the spinors as Grassmann numbers or as c-number objects

In the literature on supersymmetry, the following spinor summation convention is often used (eg. Wess & Bagger's book Supersymmetry and Supergravity) $$ \psi\chi = \psi^{\alpha}\chi_{\alpha} = -\...
3
votes
0answers
54 views

Spin of an operator in supersymmetric theories

How exactly is the spin of an operator in the context of a supersymmetric theory defined? For example, in page 25 of [1], $\mathcal{N} = 2$ supersymmetry is defined to have operators $J, G^{+}, G^{-}, ...
2
votes
0answers
169 views

Killing spinor equation [closed]

The Supersymmetry transformation is: $$\delta \psi_\mu^i=(\partial_\mu +1/4 \gamma^{ab}\omega_{\mu ab})\epsilon^i -1/8\sqrt{2}\kappa \gamma^{ab}F_{ab}\epsilon^{ij} \gamma_\mu \epsilon_j$$ For the ...
2
votes
0answers
119 views

Evaluation of the anomalous dimensions of fields in SUSY $SU(5)$

The general formula for the anomalous dimension can be found in Martin΄s review article (hep-ph/9709356), on page 62 relation (6.5.4). In the case of $SU(5)$ and especially in the paper of Kobayashi, ...
-1
votes
1answer
189 views

Explanation for the minus sign in $\Omega_3$ in the Kappa symmetry of the Green - Schwarz formalism for F1 strings

Just so that there can be more higher - level physics questions here, let me post this question + answer. Also because I'm a bit sad that there are almost no questions on the Green-Schwarz formalism....