A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

2
votes
1answer
168 views

Why do the mismatched 16 dimensions have to be compactified on an even lattice?

The mismatched 16 dimensions between the left- (26 dimensional) and right- (10 dimensional) are compactified on even, unimodular lattices. I think I get the unimoduar part, at least intuitively, ...
4
votes
1answer
220 views

N=1 v N=2 supermultiplets

I read that the chiral nature of SM fields is an indication that they must be realized in a N=1 supermultiplet (and not N=2). I don't quite understand how so. Please enlighten.
4
votes
1answer
131 views

Flavour diagonal SUSY breaking

Because there is a single Yukawa matrix for the SM leptons, the lepton mass and flavour states can be aligned, by diagonalization, even if the Yukawa matrix had off-diagonal elements. SUSY breaking, ...
3
votes
1answer
262 views

What precisely, is the string theory landscape in 10 dimensions?

I was reading this Physics.SE thread. The OP said, (changed the last word to type HO) For D = 10, there are 5 vacua. Or maybe it's more correct to say 4, since type I is S-dual to type ...
5
votes
1answer
163 views

$\mathcal{N}=2$ susy hypermultiplet self-CPT?

Is the multiplet given by $$\left( -\frac12,0,0,\frac12 \right)$$ self-CPT conjugate? There seems to be no common agreement upon that: Weinberg (QFT 3, page 47) and many others claim it is not, ...
3
votes
3answers
234 views

Assuming SUSY is found to be incorrect, what would then be the most compelling candidates for dark matter?

From what I've read, the only remaining candidates appear to be either sterile neutrinos or MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics -- it does seem to keep changing.) Did I miss anything else plausible?
7
votes
1answer
168 views

Is broken supersymmetry compatible with a small cosmological constant?

I understand that we can find the energy of a bosonic field in its vacuum state via $E_{vac}^{(B)} = \sum_{\vec{k},s} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega_{\vec{k},s}^{(B)}$ and a fermionic one similarly, ...
5
votes
1answer
362 views

Is this explanation of “Why nine space dimensions?” correct?

In Gordon Kane's Supersymmetry and Beyond (p. 118), he states: String theory has to be formulated in nine space dimensions or it is not a consistent mathematical theory. There doesn't seem to be a ...
2
votes
1answer
142 views

Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics (Does it apply?)

Suppose we try to apply supersymmetry in quantum mechanics to a particular potential. If you come up with two partner potentials, and two partner Hamiltonians, and then look at the energy of the ...
2
votes
1answer
173 views

SUSY (Supersymmetric) Quantum Mechanics

I have seen some books, e.g. by Fred Cooper (Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics), define: $A = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}} \frac{d}{dx} + W(x)$, $A^\dagger = \frac{-\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}} \frac{d}{dx} + ...
1
vote
1answer
118 views

Usefulness of SUSY models when it cannot exist at any non-zero temperature

Unlike other symmetries (like electroweak symmetry), SUSY is spontaneously broken at any non-zero temperature due to some variation of the fact that the boundary conditions on bosons and fermions in ...
5
votes
1answer
164 views

Quantum master equation in the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism

I am reading the Section 15.9 of Weinberg's book "The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 2". Under a shift $\delta\Psi[\chi]$ in $\Psi[\chi]$, we have $$ \begin{split} \delta ...
1
vote
1answer
157 views

Type I' String theory as M-theory compactified on a line segment?

I was considering the S-dual of the Type I' String theory (the solitonic Type I string theory). That is the same as the S-dual of the T-Dual of Type I String theory. Then, that means both length ...
6
votes
1answer
241 views

SUSY, ways to boost Chargino/Neutralino production?

Does anybody know a good reference that works out the equations for the Chargino/Neutralino production cross section in SUSY? I'm trying to understand if there are any tricks for boosting the ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

Scalar-fermion bound state

Is it possible to have a bound state between a scalar and a fermion? For example, a squark--anti-squark bound state, provided that the decay width is sufficiently small compared to the binding energy? ...
3
votes
1answer
120 views

How to determine predicted CP violation for a given SUSY point?

I'm currently studying at the spectra of some supersymmetric models, and would like to know whether the parameter points I'm looking at are ruled out due to excessive CP violation. I am using SPheno, ...
5
votes
0answers
98 views

Bosonic-Fermionic interactions in supersymmetry

There are a lot of supersymmetric theories, and, sometimes,in the Lagrangian, there are interacting terms between bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom, and sometimes not. Why ? For instance, for ...
7
votes
1answer
368 views

Mathematical concept of supersymmetry

I wish to study supersymmetry in field theory(sometime in december). However, I am quite not sure what is needed for its study. In supersymmetry, I just want to get the mathematical idea, such as its ...
11
votes
1answer
116 views

Some questions on a version of the O'Raifeartaigh model

This form is taken from a talk by Seiberg to which I was listening to, Take the Kahler potential ($K$) and the supersymmetric potential ($W$) as, $K = \vert X\vert ^2 + \vert \phi _1 \vert ^2 + ...
3
votes
1answer
257 views

Why should SUSY be expected naturally?

In the last 40 years (approximately) people have been "discovering", "rediscovering" and "studying" SUSY as a powerful tool and "symmetry principle". Question: What if SUSY is not realized in ...
2
votes
0answers
117 views

Holonomy twisting

There is Witten's topological twist of standard SUSY QFTs with enough SUSY into Witten-type TQFTs. What is a holonomy twist?
2
votes
1answer
167 views

Other Gross-Neveu like theories?

By "Gross-Neveu like" I mean non-supersymmetric QFTs whose partition function/beta-function (or any n-point function) is somehow exactly solvable in the large $N_c$ or $N_f$ or 't Hooft limit. ...
3
votes
0answers
49 views

Holomorphic coupling as a source for gaugino condensation

On the top of page 23 of hep-th/03061119, it is pointed out that treating the holomorphic gauge coupling $\tau$ as a background (spurion) superfield allows one to think of its $F$-term, $F_\tau$ as ...
3
votes
1answer
148 views

Supersymmetry and non-compact $R$-symmetry group?

The $R$-symmetry for $N$ supercharges is $U(N)$. Is it possible to generalize $R$-symmetry [let's take $U(4)$) to be something like $U(2,2)$ (maybe analogous to Wick rotation of $SO(3,1)$ to ...
4
votes
0answers
63 views

Does the number of left handed chiral quark superfields always equal half the number of quark flavours?

In Weinberg's "The Quantum Theory of Fields Vol III" page 267 we're told that $n_f = 2N_f$. Where $n_f$ are the number of flavours and $N_f$ is the number of left chiral quark superfields (or the ...
2
votes
0answers
55 views

Perturbation in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics.

To do perturbation analysis of Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanical Hamiltonian, the superpotential is first scaled by a constant $\lambda >> 1$ and then expanded about it's critical point. Finally ...
2
votes
1answer
76 views

Scalar top quark (stop) pair production

A rather simple question: Starting from an electrically neutral state, pairs of top quarks are produced as top and anti-top, and denoted as $t\bar t$. Now the production of pairs of scalar top ...
4
votes
1answer
152 views

Soft Mass and Physical Mass in Softly-broken SUSY

In softly broken SUSY, the bare mass parameters may be specified at e.g. the GUT scale, and then we can run these down to another scale using RGEs, similar in form to the RGEs for gauge couplings, ...
6
votes
2answers
253 views

mSUGRA boundary conditions and the MSSM

I read that in the MSSM with mSUGRA boundary conditions, the mass spectrum of the model is determined by five parameters at the GUT scale: $m_0$ (universal scalar mass), $m_{1/2}$ (universal gaugino ...
6
votes
1answer
668 views

Definition and difference between the R-symmetry and the $U(1)_R$ internal symmetry

For a general ${\cal N}$ the R-symmetry group is $U({\cal N})$ but for the ${\cal N}=2$ case why is it $SU(2)$ ? I guess it is again different for ${\cal N}=4$. How does one understand this? One ...
4
votes
1answer
166 views

Why does in string theory the amount of supersymmetry have to be $\cal{N} \leq 2 $?

Why is this, that in string theory the maximum amount of supersymmetry is $\cal{N} = 2$, whereas in supergravity one can have up to $\cal{N} = 8$ ?
5
votes
1answer
145 views

Strange Grassmann double integration

I can unterstand why because the integration over Grassman variables has to be translational invariant too, one has $$ \int d\theta = 0 $$ and $$ \int d\theta \theta = 1 $$ but I dont see where ...
3
votes
1answer
207 views

Straightforward questions about calculating SUSY F-terms

So in the Lagrangian for a SUSY theory we have the F-terms, which I have seen written (e.g., in Stephen Martin's SUSY primer) as $F^*_i F^i$ where $F^i = \frac{\partial W}{\partial \phi^i}$. I ...
1
vote
0answers
87 views

References for Understanding Minahan's N=4 SCFT review

This is about the same paper as this thread: Some questions about chapter I.1 (by Minahan) of the "Review of AdS/CFT Integrability" but it was never answered. I have some different ...
5
votes
1answer
153 views

How to determine R charge?

Ref. 1, page 15, equation (23) defines the $U(1)_V$ and $U(1)_A$ actions as $$e^{i\alpha F_V}: \Phi(x,\theta^{\pm},\bar{\theta}^{\pm}) \rightarrow e^{i\alpha q_V}: \Phi(x,e^{-i\alpha ...
5
votes
1answer
163 views

Geometric interpretation of hidden SUSY

Hidden supersymmetry, which is the classical(non-super) symmetry in the form of susy, acting on a non-Grassmann space (e.g., Grassmann space is $(t,x,\theta,\bar{\theta})$, corresponding ...
6
votes
1answer
421 views

About the definition/motivation/properties of the twisted chiral superfield in ${\cal N}=2$ theories in $1+1$ dimensions

The following is in the context of the ${\cal N}=2$ supersymmetry in $1+1$ dimensions - which is probably generically constructed as a reduction from the ${\cal N}=1$ case in $3+1$ dimensions. In ...
0
votes
1answer
99 views

Is there a relation between supersymmetry and entropy?

Considering that entropy denotes the level of order/disorder in a system, would it be possible for entropy and supersymmetry to exist at the same time? Or, are they entirely unrelated?
4
votes
2answers
379 views

Sparticles: Relationship to supersymmetry and dark matter?

I was attempting to read this paper after watching a show with Brian Greene. As I understand it, sparticles are a prediction of supersymetry, so I was wondering: Wouldn't the discovery of ...
7
votes
1answer
141 views

Does anybody know of any good sources that explain (generically) how we form Lagrangians/Actions/Superpotentials for different field content?

I regularly find that I'll understand where the field content in a particular physics paper comes from, but then a Lagrangian or action or superpotential is stated and I don't know how it's derived. ...
1
vote
0answers
89 views

What are the implications if Supersting theory is discredited? [duplicate]

Please forgive my ignorance, I am not a student of physics in any capacity, therefor my understanding of string theory is extremely limited to say the least. Based on the recent lack of evidence in ...
1
vote
0answers
103 views

A puzzle from 'The origin of the hidden supersymmetry'

In the paper arXiv:1004.5489 The origin of the hidden supersymmetry, the author use {Qa,Qa}={Qb,Qb}=2H, {Qa,Qb}=0 for N=2 hidden SUSY, which is different from what I was taught: {Qa,Qa}={Qb,Qb}=0, ...
2
votes
1answer
97 views

Hamiltonian in SUSY (SUSY algebra)

I was reading the book Supersymmetry, Theory, Experiment and Cosmology by P. Binétruy, and on page 25 the author goes from $$ 1)[Q_r,Q_t]_+ \gamma^{0}_{ts}=2\gamma^{\mu}_{rs}P_{\mu} $$ $$ ...
1
vote
1answer
162 views

Differences between Goldstone bosons and fermions

I have been looking into basic SUSY and SUGRA theory and have a question relating to Goldstinos (particles giving gravitinos mass). Simply are these analogous to Goldstone bosons produced in the ...
5
votes
0answers
86 views

sigma model on $S^1 \times S^3$

In arXiv:1207.3497 - 4D partition function on $S^1 \times S^3$ and 2D Yang-Mills with nonzero area, Yuji Tachikawa explains the partition function for an 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ sigma model on $S^3 \times ...
11
votes
1answer
322 views

Witten's constrained S-matrix and Coleman-Mandula Theorem

I remember reading somewhere that Witten argued that if the Poincaré symmetry of spacetime were nontrivially combined with internal symmetries, then the S-matrix would be so constrained that the ...
2
votes
1answer
101 views

Induce a Fayet-Iliopoulos term

In a supersymmetric U(1) gauge theory, if I leave off the Fayet-Iliopoulos term $\kappa [V]_D$, what keeps it from being induced in loop corrections?
5
votes
1answer
106 views

CP-violation in SUSY QED?

I have just gone through the exercise of constructing the supersymmetrized QED action. In the end, I get a reasonable action which matches literature. But after a little analysis, I find that the ...
7
votes
0answers
136 views

How to perform contour integral in Nekrasov's formula

My question is technical. It is about instanton counting calculation (see this paper). The partition function of SU(N) gauge theory with $N_f$ fundamental multiplets in k instanton background is ...
2
votes
0answers
85 views

Why/When can the gauge superfield and/or chiral superfield kinetic term in $(2,2)$ SUSY be ignored?

This is in reference to the argument given towards the end of page $61$ of this review paper. There for the path-integral argument to work the author clearly needed some argument to be able to ignore ...