A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

3
votes
2answers
184 views

Strings and their masses

How do strings present in particles give mass to them? Is it only by vibrating? I have been trying to find the answer but could not find it anywhere, can this question be answered?
0
votes
1answer
335 views

The future of supersymmetry [duplicate]

Considering the fault of any experimental evidence from LHC for supporting the supersymmetry idea until now, can we say that it is dead? Generally the people who are working on this subject say that ...
9
votes
2answers
289 views

Obtaining supergravity from gauging global supersymmetry

On page 92, my still favorite supersymmetry book says, by making the global infinitisimal parameter of a SUSY tranformation spacetitime dependent (gauging) it forces one to introduce a new gauge field ...
4
votes
0answers
84 views

Do commutation relations exist between superfields?

To quantize a theory, Klein gordon field for example, commutation relations are stablished. Or anticommuting ones in the fermionic case. If I have the Wess.Zumino model or the free model: ...
6
votes
0answers
176 views

What is the relation between the representation the Higgs field transforms under, the types of couplings in the theory and Higgs/Coulomb branches?

When reading about Higgs and Coulomb 'phases' I came across two separate definitions: The first tells us that the Higgs/Coulomb phases are determined by the representation that the Higgs field ...
7
votes
1answer
153 views

The stability of D-Brane

In "String Theory and M-Theory: a modern introduction" by K.Becker, M. Becker and J.H.Schwarz, they say that BPS D-brane is stable as it preserves half of the Supersymmetry. I really want to ...
4
votes
2answers
148 views

Naturalness, simplicity and SUSY

With the aid of current LHC + (all the known HEP experiments)+ (astrophysical and additional laboratory measurements)... Is SUSY natural? Is it simple? More specifically, what reasons people had (or ...
5
votes
1answer
100 views

4D instantons and the moduli space of N=2 on R^3 x S^1

I am reading the paper arXiv:0807.4723 by Gaiotto, Moore, and Neitzke on wall-crossing. I would like to understand whether if the Darboux coordinates in the mutually non-local case contain the ...
5
votes
2answers
286 views

In spontaneous symmetry breaking, global symmetry broken by gauged subgroup?

My question is simple. Given a group $G$ broken to a subgroup $H$, gauging a possibly different subgroup Hg breaks explicitly the global symmetry $G$, generating what is known as pseudo-Goldstone ...
2
votes
4answers
338 views

SUSY and the Large hadron collider

Did the LHC rule out SUSY as a solution to the hierarchy problem ? What's the common belief among theorists regarding the possibility of discovering SUSY in the 2015 run of the LHC ? Did the absence ...
5
votes
1answer
299 views

M(atrix) theory and things other than D0-branes? And is it non-peturbative M-theory or non-peturbative Type IIA theory?

When I first read the BFSS Paper on M(atrix)-theory, I was under the impression that it was a non-peturbative formulation of M-theory. But recently, upon reading this paper of Nathan Seiberg's, I ...
2
votes
1answer
188 views

Why do the mismatched 16 dimensions have to be compactified on an even lattice?

The mismatched 16 dimensions between the left- (26 dimensional) and right- (10 dimensional) are compactified on even, unimodular lattices. I think I get the unimoduar part, at least intuitively, ...
4
votes
1answer
299 views

Is there an open oriented superstring?

Type I superstring theory is unoriented, and it seems that it needs to be so in order to exist. Now, we always have open-closed duality, that connects at least the ultraviolet sector of a theory ...
4
votes
1answer
234 views

N=1 v N=2 supermultiplets

I read that the chiral nature of SM fields is an indication that they must be realized in a N=1 supermultiplet (and not N=2). I don't quite understand how so. Please enlighten.
3
votes
1answer
270 views

What precisely, is the string theory landscape in 10 dimensions?

I was reading this Physics.SE thread. The OP said, (changed the last word to type HO) For D = 10, there are 5 vacua. Or maybe it's more correct to say 4, since type I is S-dual to type ...
7
votes
1answer
178 views

Is broken supersymmetry compatible with a small cosmological constant?

I understand that we can find the energy of a bosonic field in its vacuum state via $E_{vac}^{(B)} = \sum_{\vec{k},s} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega_{\vec{k},s}^{(B)}$ and a fermionic one similarly, ...
1
vote
1answer
192 views

Plot of gauge coupling unification [closed]

(Zoom in here to see the scales.) About the result of plotting running of 3 coupling constant, we think that we should get the correct one(MSSM). But we get discontinuity at $ M_{susy}$. If there ...
2
votes
1answer
143 views

Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics (Does it apply?)

Suppose we try to apply supersymmetry in quantum mechanics to a particular potential. If you come up with two partner potentials, and two partner Hamiltonians, and then look at the energy of the ...
2
votes
1answer
181 views

SUSY (Supersymmetric) Quantum Mechanics

I have seen some books, e.g. by Fred Cooper (Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics), define: $A = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}} \frac{d}{dx} + W(x)$, $A^\dagger = \frac{-\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}} \frac{d}{dx} + ...
5
votes
1answer
372 views

Is this explanation of “Why nine space dimensions?” correct?

In Gordon Kane's Supersymmetry and Beyond (p. 118), he states: String theory has to be formulated in nine space dimensions or it is not a consistent mathematical theory. There doesn't seem to be a ...
1
vote
1answer
119 views

Usefulness of SUSY models when it cannot exist at any non-zero temperature

Unlike other symmetries (like electroweak symmetry), SUSY is spontaneously broken at any non-zero temperature due to some variation of the fact that the boundary conditions on bosons and fermions in ...
3
votes
1answer
119 views

G(2) lattice and the M-theory landscape

In a previous question (Calabi-Yau manifolds and compactification of extra dimensions in M-theory), I was told that the $G(2)$ lattice can be used to compactify the extra 7 dimensions of M-theory and ...
1
vote
1answer
222 views

Calabi-Yau manifolds and compactification of extra dimensions in M-theory

I just finished learning M(atrix) theory and the basics of the compactification of extra dimensions. The extra 6 dimensions of superstring theory can be compactified on 3 Calabi-Yau manifolds ...
0
votes
1answer
188 views

Why isn't there a Heterotic string theory which tensors the fermionic state with the Type II state?

The Heterotic (HO and HE) string is found by tensoring the left movers of the bosonic string theory state and the right movers of the Type II string theory state: ...
7
votes
0answers
162 views

What really are exotic supersymmetric black holes?

I have just read (in the black holes chapter 14 on p244 of this book Ref.1) that in string theory, when one adds an (electric?) charge $Q$ to a static black hole, one can arrive at an exotic ...
1
vote
1answer
160 views

Type I' String theory as M-theory compactified on a line segment?

I was considering the S-dual of the Type I' String theory (the solitonic Type I string theory). That is the same as the S-dual of the T-Dual of Type I String theory. Then, that means both length ...
5
votes
1answer
171 views

Quantum master equation in the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism

I am reading the Section 15.9 of Weinberg's book "The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 2". Under a shift $\delta\Psi[\chi]$ in $\Psi[\chi]$, we have $$ \begin{split} \delta ...
3
votes
1answer
216 views

Complex masses for Dirac and Weyl spinors

I'm trying understand how to rotate Dirac fields to absorb complex phases in masses. I have a few related questions: With Weyl spinors, I understand, $$ \mathcal{L} = \text{kinetic} + ...
1
vote
0answers
57 views

Scalar-fermion bound state

Is it possible to have a bound state between a scalar and a fermion? For example, a squark--anti-squark bound state, provided that the decay width is sufficiently small compared to the binding energy? ...
5
votes
1answer
286 views

T-Duality between Type HE String theory and Type HO string theory

My question is regarding T-Duality between the 2 Type H string theories. I know that the Type II String theories are T-dual to each other because T-Duality changes the sign of the Gamma Matrix so ...
3
votes
1answer
112 views

Question on Type HO/HE string theory

The Heterotic string state is a tensoring of the bosonic string left-moving state and the Type II string right-moving state. Therefore, I expect the spectrum to be: $$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \hline ...
5
votes
0answers
100 views

Bosonic-Fermionic interactions in supersymmetry

There are a lot of supersymmetric theories, and, sometimes,in the Lagrangian, there are interacting terms between bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom, and sometimes not. Why ? For instance, for ...
7
votes
3answers
736 views

How can string theory work without supersymmetry?

This question is inspired from reading Mitchell Porter's nice answer here to a question asking why supersymmetry should be expected naturally. Among other things, he explains that since weak scale ...
2
votes
2answers
145 views

Question on the Hagedorn tower in Type I string theory

In a previous question (Mass spectrum of Type I string theory), I had asked about the mass spectrum of Type I string theory. I got a response saying that it is a Hagedorn tower. However, my source ...
4
votes
1answer
133 views

Flavour diagonal SUSY breaking

Because there is a single Yukawa matrix for the SM leptons, the lepton mass and flavour states can be aligned, by diagonalization, even if the Yukawa matrix had off-diagonal elements. SUSY breaking, ...
3
votes
1answer
148 views

Mass spectrum of Type I string theory

I understand that the massless fields of the Type I string theory are the described by: [\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{\rm{Sector}}}&{{\rm{Massless fields}}}\\ {{\rm{R - R}}}&{{C_0}}\\ {{\rm{NS - ...
3
votes
1answer
128 views

Spectra of the Type II String theories

The spectrum of the Type II string theory (both IIA and IIB) is given by: \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \hline & {{\text{Sector}}}& & {{\text{Spectrum}}}& & {{\text{Massless Fields}}} ...
3
votes
1answer
267 views

Why should SUSY be expected naturally?

In the last 40 years (approximately) people have been "discovering", "rediscovering" and "studying" SUSY as a powerful tool and "symmetry principle". Question: What if SUSY is not realized in ...
2
votes
0answers
118 views

Holonomy twisting

There is Witten's topological twist of standard SUSY QFTs with enough SUSY into Witten-type TQFTs. What is a holonomy twist?
3
votes
0answers
50 views

Holomorphic coupling as a source for gaugino condensation

On the top of page 23 of hep-th/03061119, it is pointed out that treating the holomorphic gauge coupling $\tau$ as a background (spurion) superfield allows one to think of its $F$-term, $F_\tau$ as ...
7
votes
2answers
204 views

Supersymmetric Chern-Simons theories in $d=3$

I am reading up on Chern-Simons matter theories in $d=3$. Here is the quote (from http://thesis.library.caltech.edu/7111 page 15) that I am having trouble with: One could also add a supersymmetric ...
4
votes
0answers
63 views

Does the number of left handed chiral quark superfields always equal half the number of quark flavours?

In Weinberg's "The Quantum Theory of Fields Vol III" page 267 we're told that $n_f = 2N_f$. Where $n_f$ are the number of flavours and $N_f$ is the number of left chiral quark superfields (or the ...
3
votes
1answer
152 views

Supersymmetry and non-compact $R$-symmetry group?

The $R$-symmetry for $N$ supercharges is $U(N)$. Is it possible to generalize $R$-symmetry [let's take $U(4)$) to be something like $U(2,2)$ (maybe analogous to Wick rotation of $SO(3,1)$ to ...
3
votes
0answers
60 views

Perturbation in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics.

To do perturbation analysis of Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanical Hamiltonian, the superpotential is first scaled by a constant $\lambda >> 1$ and then expanded about it's critical point. Finally ...
2
votes
1answer
76 views

Scalar top quark (stop) pair production

A rather simple question: Starting from an electrically neutral state, pairs of top quarks are produced as top and anti-top, and denoted as $t\bar t$. Now the production of pairs of scalar top ...
5
votes
1answer
176 views

$\mathcal{N}=2$ susy hypermultiplet self-CPT?

Is the multiplet given by $$\left( -\frac12,0,0,\frac12 \right)$$ self-CPT conjugate? There seems to be no common agreement upon that: Weinberg (QFT 3, page 47) and many others claim it is not, ...
12
votes
1answer
275 views

Supersymmetric Noether theorem and supercurrents — invariance requirements

Consider $\mathcal{N}=1,d=4$ SUSY with $n$ chiral superfields $\Phi^i,$ Kaehler potential $K,$ superpotential $W$ and action ($\overline{\Phi}_i$ is complex conjugate of $\Phi^i$) $$ S= \int d^4x ...
4
votes
1answer
169 views

Why does in string theory the amount of supersymmetry have to be $\cal{N} \leq 2 $?

Why is this, that in string theory the maximum amount of supersymmetry is $\cal{N} = 2$, whereas in supergravity one can have up to $\cal{N} = 8$ ?
8
votes
3answers
611 views

What is kappa symmetry?

On page 180 David McMohan explains that to obtain a (spacetime) supersymmetric action for a GS superstring one has to add to the bosonic part $$ S_B = -\frac{1}{2\pi}\int d^2 \sigma ...
7
votes
1answer
267 views

Supersymmetry calculations using computer algebra

Already the early papers on supergravity were written using computer algebra software to do some calculations. What modern packages do people normally use for doing such calculations? Of course ...