A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

11
votes
2answers
1k views

Deriving Feynman rules from a Lagrangian for vertex factors for “more complicated” interactions

I am trying to derive Feynman rules from a given Lagrangian and I got stuck on some vertex factors. What for example is the vertex factor that corresponds to the four-scalar interaction that is ...
4
votes
0answers
57 views

Concerning topology of BPS states of the M5-brane

My question is about the M5-brane in M-theory. I would like to know whether the BPS states of the M5-brane worldvolume theory (especially the 1/2 BPS and 1/4 BPS ones) are independent of the topology ...
12
votes
2answers
469 views

Alejandro Rivero's correspondence: diquarks and mesons as superpartners of quarks and leptons

The idea of “hadronic supersymmetry” originated in the mid-1960s and derives from the observation that baryons and mesons have similar Regge slopes, as if antiquarks and diquarks are superpartners. ...
12
votes
2answers
4k views

How can the mass of Higgs give preference to SUSY vs multiverse?

According to the documentary Particle Fever, the precise value of the Higgs boson's mass could give more credence to either SUSY or multiverse theories. If the mass had been 115 GeV or below SUSY ...
6
votes
3answers
458 views

Problems book recommendation on supersymmetry, supergravity and superstring theory

I'm learning supersymmetry, supergravity and superstring. I want some problems books to have some idea in this area. Is there this kind of books? Or are there some papers that have many solved model?
0
votes
0answers
37 views

Can we have supersymmetry using real scalar instead of complex scalars?

I am aware that a suersymmetric theories containing a complex scalar a Weyl fermion and an auxiliary field exist. I was wondering if we can have something analogous using real and not complex scalar ...
3
votes
1answer
612 views

Instantons in Witten's supersymmetry and Morse theory

I'm reading Witten's paper on supersymmetry and Morse theory and am confused about the details of the instanton calculation which he uses to define a Morse complex (beginning at page 11 of the pdf) . ...
8
votes
2answers
18k views

Supersymmetry vs multiverse

I'm a complete noobe in physics and quite honestly need help. My question is simple, based on CERN's tentative findings stating the Higgs boson at a mass of ~125 GeV: Is the physics community leaning ...
1
vote
0answers
79 views

Anomaly polynomial of Hitchin system $\mathcal{N}=2$ 4d SQFT

I would like to ask about mathematical background of this object. So, I am trying to puzzle out with 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SQFT. As far as I can gather this theory can be described in terms of ...
1
vote
1answer
123 views

Canonical spinors from gauge transformations

In this 2006 paper, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610128, there is the concept of gauge transformation and how was it employed that I do not fully understand. Note, what will be talked about below is ...
6
votes
1answer
148 views

Where does the “Supersymmetry” in Witten's proof of the Morse inequalities come from?

Where does the "Supersymmetry" in Witten's proof of the Morse inequalities (original paper and outline of proof for mathematicians) come from? Hopefully someone can provide an intuitive understanding? ...
1
vote
0answers
68 views

Representation theory and the Nekrasov partition function

Is there any review or lecture notes on the Nekrasov partition function which particularly thinks of this from a representation theorist's point of view? Some possibly related references I know of ...
1
vote
1answer
97 views

Dimensional reduction of SUSY theories

I know that if one reduces 10 dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM theory to 4 dimensions one gets $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM. There are other examples also. I have two related questions regarding this fact. ...
1
vote
0answers
102 views

Supersymmetric transformation of general Wess-Zumino Lagrangian

I suspect that I might have understood something wrong here. I'm trying to show that the general Wess-Zumino Lagrangian \begin{align} \mathcal{L} &= \int d^2\theta d^2\bar{\theta} K(\Phi^*, \Phi) +...
1
vote
0answers
53 views

Can i use the $y^*$ representation of the chiral covariant derivatives on a superfield that contains both $y$ and $y^*$?

Imagine I want to compute this $$D^{\dagger2}D_{\alpha}(\Phi^*\Phi)$$ where the $D$-s are super-covariant derivatives and $\Phi$ is a chiral superfield. Following the notation of this review on ...
1
vote
0answers
27 views

Which is the analogous of the unitarity constraint of chiral perturbation theory in superchiral perturbation theory?

I am trying to reconstruct something and I would appreciate omeone helping me filling the gaps. To motivate my question let's first consider chiral perturbation theory with up and down quarks. This is ...
1
vote
0answers
55 views
5
votes
0answers
271 views

Book with solved examples and exercise problems for SUSY

I am learning supersymmetry right now. I am mostly following Bailin and Love. I try to connect all the steps from the book and complete the derivations in order to get comfortable with the ...
3
votes
1answer
90 views

Why must superpartners have the same gauge quantum numbers?

The title leaves it quite clear, why must superpartners have the same gauge quantum numbers?
2
votes
1answer
68 views

What is $\mathcal{N}=2$ QED?

I would like to know is $\mathcal{N}=2$ QED is simply a $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory with gauge group $U(1)$ like in normal QED? If not, exactly what theory is it? Is there some reference for it?
1
vote
1answer
165 views

Should the (On-shell) (2+1)d $N=2$ Chiral Multiplet Contain Two Scalars and Two Majorana Spinors?

In supermultiplets, the bosonic degrees of freedom and the fermionic degrees of freedom need to match in number. The number of degrees of freedom of a field corresponds to the number of independent ...
2
votes
0answers
83 views

(Super)Gauge Fixing in Supersymmetry

I have three questions about gauge fixing in supersymmetry, one is general and the other two explicit: Why gauge fixing seems not important in supersymmetry? By "not important" I mean gauge fixing ...
1
vote
0answers
61 views

Projection that keeps graviton but gets rid of B-field

We consider the closed superstring and the massless states in the (NS,NS)-sector \begin{equation} \tilde{b}^i_{-\frac{1}{2}} |0\rangle_L \otimes b^j_{-\frac{1}{2}} |0\rangle_R. \end{equation} It is ...
2
votes
0answers
563 views

What is special about a 126 GeV Higgs mass?

The 126 GeV Higgs mass seems to be a rather special value, from all the a priori possible values. One thing I've heard is that it is just at the edge of the mass range implying a stable vacuum, and ...
1
vote
1answer
127 views

Quantum mechanic particle

In non relativistic quantum mechanic, we are dealing with a problem involving a particle in one dimensional space, and it has been given the potential and it reads: $$V(x)~=~A'(x)^2-\frac{\hbar}{\...
0
votes
1answer
193 views

Methods of detecting gravitino DM and possible implications for theories of everything

Let me summarize my thoughts about topics in theoretical physics: Theory of everything: The theory of everything aims to unite all the four forces of nature into one single elegant equation. ...
6
votes
2answers
393 views

Stablising the Higgs without SUSY

Should the Higgs be found at the LHC, but no supersymmetry (assuming for the sake of argument that the LHC be capable of eliminating all versions of SUSY that are motivated by solving the hierarchy ...
1
vote
1answer
451 views

What is the $\mu$ problem in SUSY?

I need a little bit of help in understanding the mu problem in SUSY. As I understand it, the gist of the problem is that $\mu$ must be on the same order of magnitude as the electroweak scale (246 GeV)....
4
votes
1answer
591 views

Hierarchy is no problem and susy is a mathematical tool for data fitting

I saw this paper in the arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4711. The author seems well-known and has many very well cited papers. But what he says sounds very strange. What I get from this paper are ...
1
vote
1answer
84 views

supersymmetry in 7, 8, 9 dimension

Why above dimension (7,8,9) the number of supercharge per supersymmetry is equal? $i.e$ For 32 supercharges, supersymmetry in 7,8,9 dimension is describe by $N=2$. And for 16 supercharges, ...
0
votes
1answer
58 views

Polchinski, (0,0) picture vertex operator

I am currently working through chapter 12 of Polchinski and am confused as to how the equation $(12.3.39)$ for the (0,0) picture vertex operator arises. From the text: The state–operator mapping ...
2
votes
1answer
304 views

Understanding Fierz rearrangement identity

I'm trying to get a better grasp of the Fierz rearrangement identity for 2-component spinors (Equation 2.20 I'll be using the Van der Waerden notionation used in the given link) $$ \chi_\alpha (\xi \...
2
votes
1answer
233 views

Signs of supersymmetry and thus dark matter at CERN

The Large Hadron Collider at CERN has just re-started after a two year pause and is now running at unprecedented levels of 6.5 TeV, with collisions that will release up to 13.5 TeV. With this increase ...
1
vote
1answer
113 views

What is meant by “the superpotential is not renormalized”?

Reading about supersymmetry I often read the phrase because of the non-renormalization theorems the superpotential is not renormalized. I would like someone to be more explicit on what is ...
1
vote
1answer
100 views

Do the Grassmann coordinates in the superfield formalism have any physical meaning?

In the superfield formalism we consider fields in a space who has four so called bosonic coordinates $x^{\nu}$ and four so called fermionic coordinates $\theta_1$,$\theta_2$,$\bar{\theta_1}$,$\bar{\...
1
vote
1answer
70 views

Partial derivatives of chiral superfields with respect to scalar components in the superpotential

I am following some notes on supersymmetry by Matteo Bertolini and I need some clarification. Chapter five deals with sypersymmetric Lagrangians and the superpotential is introduced. It is stated ...
1
vote
0answers
73 views

Supermultiplet dimensions from Young Tableaus

In John Terning's book, on pages 14 and 15, there are lists of $\mathcal{N} = 2$ and $\mathcal{N} = 4$ supermultiplets, labeled in terms of the dimensions of the corresponding R-symmetry $d_R$ and ...
3
votes
1answer
106 views

Why must the supersymmetry generators be spinors?

I have read in a few places (for example, at page 5 here) that the supersymmetry generators must be spinors. Quoting the reference mentioned The generator of the symmetry must relate two types of ...
1
vote
1answer
93 views

Elementary question about global supersymmetry of a worldsheet [closed]

I'm reading chapter 4 of the book by Green, Schwarz and Witten. They consider an action $$ S = -\frac{1}{2\pi} \int d^2 \sigma \left( \partial_\alpha X^\mu \partial^\alpha X_\mu - i \bar \psi^\mu \rho^...
1
vote
1answer
76 views

Why we do we consider explicit SUSY breaking in the MSSM and not an spontaneous breaking of SUSY?

Reading about the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) I have found that an explicit breaking of supersymmetry is considered, given by the term $$\cal{L}_{soft}$$ where soft supersymmetry ...
1
vote
0answers
90 views

What mathematical structure describes superspace and superfields?

In every book related to supersymmetry I have encountered at some point the idea of superspace is introduced. Superspace is presented as a space spanned by 4 "normal" directions and 4 Grassmannian ...
1
vote
0answers
71 views

How can we see that a 4D N = 2 sigma model will yield a 3D N = 4 sigma model when compactified on a circle?

I have a question about sigma models in 3D. If we have $\mathcal{N}=2$ field theory on $\mathbb{R}^4$ and compactify it on $\mathbb{R}^3 \times S^1_R$ (in which $S^1_R$ is a circle of radius $R$) we ...
1
vote
0answers
55 views

Supersymmetry invariants

On page 158 of Fields, the supersymmetry algebra is represented in terms of the action on supercoordinates as $$\delta \theta^\alpha = \epsilon^\alpha$$ $$\delta\bar{\theta}^{\dot{\alpha}} = \bar{\...
2
votes
0answers
112 views

Intro to Super Yang Mills theory

I'm looking to start learning Super Yang Mills theory. Currently I have studied Peskin and Schroeder up to the Renormalization Group, but don't know supersymmetry yet. I know some Conformal Field ...
0
votes
1answer
34 views

Why is the mass dimension of anticommutingcoordinates $[Mass]−1/2$

I am reading a review about supersymmetry and in page 29 I have read that the mass dimension of the Grassmann anticommuting coordinates is $-1/2$. Why this? why don't they have the same mass ...
1
vote
2answers
432 views

Elliptic genus; What is it within string/M-theory?

What is the elliptic genus (see also Witten index) in string/M-theory and (susy gauge)field theory constructions out of them? What does it tell us heuristically and what is its relation to the ...
1
vote
0answers
66 views

Some questions about Weyl spinor algebra

I am following a review on supersymmetry and I am having trouble with Weyl spinor algebra. These are equations (4.2.1) $$Q_{\alpha}=i\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta^{\alpha}}-(\sigma^{\mu}\theta^{\...
15
votes
1answer
318 views

Explicit supersymmetry breaking fermion mass terms

I hope you can clear up my following confusions. In Girardello's and Grisaru's paper (Nuclear Physics B, 194, 65 (1982)) where they analysed the most general soft explicit supersymmetry breaking ...
4
votes
2answers
139 views

Viability of a Fayet Iliopoulos term in the MSSM

Why is a Fayet-Iliopoulos term $-kD$ irrelevant or subdominant in the in the MSSM (Minimal Susy Standard Model)? According to Martin (A Supersymmetry Primer, p.70) it's because squarks and sleptons ...
5
votes
1answer
264 views

Basic question about superspace, Grassmann numbers and world sheet supersymmetry

So, I'm trying to read the section on superspace from the book on string theory by Becker, Becker and Schwarz, and I realized that I've been stuck on something simple for a while. Some relevant ...