A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

8
votes
1answer
789 views

Why do we need to find 5 Higgs Bosons to prove the existence of the dark matter?

I was recently watching a show that say we need at least 5 Higgs Boson to prove the existence of the dark matter because it will strengthen the concept of symmetry. Why is that so? Because, I am not ...
4
votes
0answers
87 views

Degrees of freedom in m(atrix) theory

The Hamiltonian for m(atrix) theory is given by $$H=\frac{1}{2\lambda}\text{Tr}\left(P^{a}P_{a}+\frac{1}{2}\left[X^{a},X^{b}\right]^{2}+\theta^{T}\gamma_{a}\left[X^{a},\theta\right]\right).$$ Where ...
4
votes
1answer
110 views

Dimensional reduction of Yang-Mills to m(atrix) theory

The Yang-Mills action are usually given by $$S= \int\text{d}^{10}\sigma\,\text{Tr}\left(-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-\theta^{T}\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\theta\right)$$ with the field strength defined ...
6
votes
2answers
178 views

How does a SCFT avoid the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem?

According to the Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem the most general symmetry that a consistent 4 dimensional field theory can enjoy is supersymmery, seen as an extension of Poincarè symmetry, in direct ...
5
votes
1answer
143 views

Why do three dimensional gauge theories flow to conformal theories in the infrared?

What is meant with the fact that Super Yang-Mills flows to a conformal field theory in the infrared? Also, is this a general fact or does this depend on the fact of considering a certain class of ...
3
votes
3answers
246 views

Renormalization of Composite Chiral Superfields

On page 24 of these lecture notes http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0309149 it is stated that products of chiral superfields do not suffer from short distance singularities. In other words, if I want to ...
2
votes
1answer
185 views

Diagonalize mass matrix term for fermions and “doubling trick” in m(atrix) theory

Can someone help me understand the "Doubling trick" at page 36 in http://inspirehep.net/record/887513/files/sis-2002-060.pdf (named "Scattering in Supersymmetric M(atrix) Models" by Robert Helling) or ...
2
votes
1answer
126 views

Relation between $\mathcal{N}=2$ d=4 SUSY and $\mathcal{N}=4$ d=3 SUSY

What is meant with the fact that supersymmetry with $\mathcal{N}=4$ in three (2+1) dimensions is equivalent to supersymmetry with $\mathcal{N}=2$ in ordinary four (3+1) dimensions? Which way does one ...
3
votes
1answer
108 views

Hyperkahler manifolds and their use in theoretical physics

Just as the title says: What is the easiest definition of a Hyperkahler Manifold? Could you give some examples of Hyperkahler manifolds, and manifolds which fail to be hyperkahler? Why are such ...
2
votes
1answer
49 views

Baryon operators for $N_f<N_c$

Simple question. The answer is probably obvious, but I just don't see it. In section 3 of this paper http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9509066 it is stated that in SUSY QCD if $N_f<N_c$ the classical ...
2
votes
2answers
221 views

Have we found a Higgsino?

In supersymmetry, for each particle (boson/fermion), there is a symmetric particle which is a fermion/boson. The MSSM predicts five Higgs bosons: two neutral scalar ones (H and h), a pseudo-scalar ...
1
vote
0answers
76 views

What is the difference between broken and unbroken sypersymmetry?

In a physics article I read recently, the author introduces the notion of supersymmetry by saying basically that the system described by the Hamiltonian $H$ is supersymmetric if $H$ can be decomposed ...
2
votes
0answers
104 views

What is the relation between N=2 super Yang-Mills and its twist

My question is what is the relation between N=2 super Yang-Mills and its twisted version topological field theory? After twisting N=2 super Yang-Mills, i.e. diagonally embedding $SU(2)'_R$ into ...
1
vote
0answers
141 views

N=2 Dualities; k-differentials on the riemann sphere and a spectral curve

Currently I am working on my masters thesis about dualities in QFT and their geometric realizations. As of now, I am trying to understand the article 'N=2 Dualities" by Davide Gaiotto. On the ...
4
votes
1answer
66 views

Why does the $\tilde\chi^0_2 \,\tilde\chi^\pm_1$ cross section increase in the focus point region?

The focus point is an interesting region of the cMSSM parameter space at high $m_0$ and low $m_{1/2}$. Features are high scalar masses (> 1-2 TeV), light charginos / neutralinos (which are ...
3
votes
0answers
95 views

Why does global supersymmetry commute with gauge transformations?

In particular, I would like to understand the following quotation from a paper by Witten: Nucl.Phys. B188 (1981) 513 (p. 515 at the top) His statement: This is so because in global supersymmetry ...
1
vote
0answers
63 views

Sharp cut-off, quadratic corrections and naturalness

When introducing the fine-tuning problem, a sharp cut-off as a regulator in the calculation of the Higgs mass corrections is used. Since this regulator breaks translational and gauge invariance, up to ...
3
votes
1answer
159 views

SUSY as the only way to unify bosons and fermions

Is SUSY really the only known approach to "merge"/unify bosons and fermions in a common framework? BONUS question: If SUSY does exist at high energy, it seems unnatural and "not simple" in the sense ...
9
votes
1answer
254 views

What is the definition of a “UV-complete” theory?

I would like to know (1) what exactly is a UV-complete theory and (2) what is a confirmatory test of that? Is asymptotic freedom enough to conclude that a theory is UV-complete? Does it become ...
3
votes
1answer
106 views

Are there two types of D-term and two types of F-term in SUSY?

I've noticed that one can obtain D-terms either by integrating a vector superfield (the vector multiplet) over superspace or by integrating a Kahler potential over superspace. In both cases we get ...
-1
votes
1answer
129 views

Explanation for the minus sign in $\Omega_3$ in the Kappa symmetry of the Green - Schwarz formalism for F1 strings

Just so that there can be more higher - level physics questions here, let me post this question + answer. Also because I'm a bit sad that there are almost no questions on the Green-Schwarz ...
8
votes
4answers
267 views

What does “carry a representation” mean (in SUSY algebra)?

I come from a maths background and am struggling with some of the more physical texts on SUSY. In particular they claim that the fermionic generators $Q_A^i$ carry a representation of the Lorentz ...
7
votes
0answers
108 views

Simple argument for unexpected behavior in SUSY model

Consider a supersymmetric theory with 3 chiral superfields, $X, \Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2,$ with canonical Kahler potential and superpotential $$ W= \frac12 h_1 X\Phi_1^2 +\frac12 h_2 \Phi_2\Phi_1^2 + fX.$$ ...
3
votes
2answers
182 views

Strings and their masses

How do strings present in particles give mass to them? Is it only by vibrating? I have been trying to find the answer but could not find it anywhere, can this question be answered?
0
votes
1answer
311 views

The future of supersymmetry [duplicate]

Considering the fault of any experimental evidence from LHC for supporting the supersymmetry idea until now, can we say that it is dead? Generally the people who are working on this subject say that ...
9
votes
2answers
276 views

Obtaining supergravity from gauging global supersymmetry

On page 92, my still favorite supersymmetry book says, by making the global infinitisimal parameter of a SUSY tranformation spacetitime dependent (gauging) it forces one to introduce a new gauge field ...
4
votes
0answers
81 views

Do commutation relations exist between superfields?

To quantize a theory, Klein gordon field for example, commutation relations are stablished. Or anticommuting ones in the fermionic case. If I have the Wess.Zumino model or the free model: ...
6
votes
0answers
159 views

What is the relation between the representation the Higgs field transforms under, the types of couplings in the theory and Higgs/Coulomb branches?

When reading about Higgs and Coulomb 'phases' I came across two separate definitions: The first tells us that the Higgs/Coulomb phases are determined by the representation that the Higgs field ...
7
votes
1answer
141 views

The stability of D-Brane

In "String Theory and M-Theory: a modern introduction" by K.Becker, M. Becker and J.H.Schwarz, they say that BPS D-brane is stable as it preserves half of the Supersymmetry. I really want to ...
4
votes
2answers
145 views

Naturalness, simplicity and SUSY

With the aid of current LHC + (all the known HEP experiments)+ (astrophysical and additional laboratory measurements)... Is SUSY natural? Is it simple? More specifically, what reasons people had (or ...
5
votes
1answer
94 views

4D instantons and the moduli space of N=2 on R^3 x S^1

I am reading the paper arXiv:0807.4723 by Gaiotto, Moore, and Neitzke on wall-crossing. I would like to understand whether if the Darboux coordinates in the mutually non-local case contain the ...
5
votes
2answers
271 views

In spontaneous symmetry breaking, global symmetry broken by gauged subgroup?

My question is simple. Given a group $G$ broken to a subgroup $H$, gauging a possibly different subgroup Hg breaks explicitly the global symmetry $G$, generating what is known as pseudo-Goldstone ...
2
votes
4answers
327 views

SUSY and the Large hadron collider

Did the LHC rule out SUSY as a solution to the hierarchy problem ? What's the common belief among theorists regarding the possibility of discovering SUSY in the 2015 run of the LHC ? Did the absence ...
5
votes
1answer
265 views

M(atrix) theory and things other than D0-branes? And is it non-peturbative M-theory or non-peturbative Type IIA theory?

When I first read the BFSS Paper on M(atrix)-theory, I was under the impression that it was a non-peturbative formulation of M-theory. But recently, upon reading this paper of Nathan Seiberg's, I ...
2
votes
1answer
163 views

Why do the mismatched 16 dimensions have to be compactified on an even lattice?

The mismatched 16 dimensions between the left- (26 dimensional) and right- (10 dimensional) are compactified on even, unimodular lattices. I think I get the unimoduar part, at least intuitively, ...
4
votes
1answer
291 views

Is there an open oriented superstring?

Type I superstring theory is unoriented, and it seems that it needs to be so in order to exist. Now, we always have open-closed duality, that connects at least the ultraviolet sector of a theory ...
4
votes
1answer
217 views

N=1 v N=2 supermultiplets

I read that the chiral nature of SM fields is an indication that they must be realized in a N=1 supermultiplet (and not N=2). I don't quite understand how so. Please enlighten.
3
votes
1answer
257 views

What precisely, is the string theory landscape in 10 dimensions?

I was reading this Physics.SE thread. The OP said, (changed the last word to type HO) For D = 10, there are 5 vacua. Or maybe it's more correct to say 4, since type I is S-dual to type ...
7
votes
1answer
162 views

Is broken supersymmetry compatible with a small cosmological constant?

I understand that we can find the energy of a bosonic field in its vacuum state via $E_{vac}^{(B)} = \sum_{\vec{k},s} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega_{\vec{k},s}^{(B)}$ and a fermionic one similarly, ...
1
vote
1answer
178 views

Plot of gauge coupling unification [closed]

(Zoom in here to see the scales.) About the result of plotting running of 3 coupling constant, we think that we should get the correct one(MSSM). But we get discontinuity at $ M_{susy}$. If there ...
2
votes
1answer
142 views

Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics (Does it apply?)

Suppose we try to apply supersymmetry in quantum mechanics to a particular potential. If you come up with two partner potentials, and two partner Hamiltonians, and then look at the energy of the ...
2
votes
1answer
173 views

SUSY (Supersymmetric) Quantum Mechanics

I have seen some books, e.g. by Fred Cooper (Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics), define: $A = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}} \frac{d}{dx} + W(x)$, $A^\dagger = \frac{-\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}} \frac{d}{dx} + ...
5
votes
1answer
361 views

Is this explanation of “Why nine space dimensions?” correct?

In Gordon Kane's Supersymmetry and Beyond (p. 118), he states: String theory has to be formulated in nine space dimensions or it is not a consistent mathematical theory. There doesn't seem to be a ...
1
vote
1answer
117 views

Usefulness of SUSY models when it cannot exist at any non-zero temperature

Unlike other symmetries (like electroweak symmetry), SUSY is spontaneously broken at any non-zero temperature due to some variation of the fact that the boundary conditions on bosons and fermions in ...
3
votes
1answer
118 views

G(2) lattice and the M-theory landscape

In a previous question (Calabi-Yau manifolds and compactification of extra dimensions in M-theory), I was told that the $G(2)$ lattice can be used to compactify the extra 7 dimensions of M-theory and ...
1
vote
1answer
215 views

Calabi-Yau manifolds and compactification of extra dimensions in M-theory

I just finished learning M(atrix) theory and the basics of the compactification of extra dimensions. The extra 6 dimensions of superstring theory can be compactified on 3 Calabi-Yau manifolds ...
0
votes
1answer
185 views

Why isn't there a Heterotic string theory which tensors the fermionic state with the Type II state?

The Heterotic (HO and HE) string is found by tensoring the left movers of the bosonic string theory state and the right movers of the Type II string theory state: ...
7
votes
0answers
160 views

What really are exotic supersymmetric black holes?

I have just read (in the black holes chapter 14 on p244 of this book Ref.1) that in string theory, when one adds an (electric?) charge $Q$ to a static black hole, one can arrive at an exotic ...
1
vote
1answer
157 views

Type I' String theory as M-theory compactified on a line segment?

I was considering the S-dual of the Type I' String theory (the solitonic Type I string theory). That is the same as the S-dual of the T-Dual of Type I String theory. Then, that means both length ...
5
votes
1answer
160 views

Quantum master equation in the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism

I am reading the Section 15.9 of Weinberg's book "The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 2". Under a shift $\delta\Psi[\chi]$ in $\Psi[\chi]$, we have $$ \begin{split} \delta ...