A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

3
votes
1answer
70 views

Neutrino Nuclei Coherent scattering and the Dark Matter lower wall

Suppose that current and new forthcoming dark matter direct detection experiments find no evidence of Dark matter events and exclude interactions of hypothetical DM particles (like LSP or similar) in ...
0
votes
0answers
29 views

Supercharge definition in Becker-Becker-Schwarz

How does one interpret equation (4.20) in Becker-Becker-Schwarz "String Theory and M-Theory", particularly the $ \frac{\partial}{\partial \bar{\theta}^A} $ term where the $\theta$ is the Grassmann ...
9
votes
1answer
188 views

Assumptions of the Coleman-Mandula Theorem

In the original paper All Possible Symmetries of the S-Matrix, by S. Coleman and J. Mandula, they prove their famous 'no go' theorem regarding the possible extensions of Poincaré symmetry. The ...
6
votes
1answer
117 views

WIMPs and Gravitinos

I was just wandering if a gravitino could be in the WIMP class, because they are both massive (admittedly WIMP's more so) and are both weakly interacting and predicted by R-parity. i.e Gravitinos are ...
5
votes
0answers
44 views

N=4 SYM in terms of N=1- SO(6) in the yukawa term

I'm trying to write N=4 SYM in terms of N=1 superfields. I have the lagrangian $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{16 k} \int d^2 \sigma \text{Tr} \big[W^a W_a\big]+c.c+\int d^4\theta \text{Tr}\big[\bar{\Phi}^i ...
2
votes
0answers
171 views

What is special about a 126 GeV Higgs mass?

The 126 GeV Higgs mass seems to be a rather special value, from all the a priori possible values. One thing I've heard is that it is just at the edge of the mass range implying a stable vacuum, and ...
10
votes
1answer
353 views

Auxiliary fields in supersymmetry

I know that auxiliary fields can be used to close the supersymmetry algebra in case the bosonic and fermionic on-shell degrees of freedom do not match. Could somebody please elaborate on this concept ...
1
vote
0answers
37 views

Comprehensive list of $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric topological quantum field theories in $d=4$

Could anyone provide a comprehensive list of $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric topological quantum field theories in $d=4$? I know of one - Kapustin-Witten TQFT, but I do not know of any more. Thanks!
3
votes
1answer
76 views

Question about the vacuum bundle on A- and B-model

Let us consider the topological string A- and B-model (twisted SUSY non-linear sigma model on CY 3-manifold $X$). They are realization of $N=2$ SCFT and there are ground-states vector bundle ...
3
votes
0answers
33 views

$\mathcal{N}=2$ spin $1/2$ supermultiplet

In Freedman and Van Proeyen's Supergravity, in the footnote on pg. 128, they say There is a subtle hermiticity requirement for $\mathcal{N}=2$, which requires the multiplet $(-1/2,0,0,1/2)$ must ...
6
votes
0answers
176 views

What is the relation between the representation the Higgs field transforms under, the types of couplings in the theory and Higgs/Coulomb branches?

When reading about Higgs and Coulomb 'phases' I came across two separate definitions: The first tells us that the Higgs/Coulomb phases are determined by the representation that the Higgs field ...
4
votes
0answers
273 views

What's the Coulomb Branch and why is it important?

I'm studying the introduction of flavour degrees of freedom in the AdS/CFT correspondence and now I'm supposed to calculate the mass spectrum of mesons in the Coulomb branch. I have searched the ...
4
votes
1answer
133 views

Questions on the $N=2$ superconformal algebra

In my understanding, mirror symmetry in physics originates from representation of the $N=2$ superconformal algebra. Why do we need precisely 2 supersymmetries (why not 1 or 4)? Moreover, a chiral ...
3
votes
2answers
189 views

Learning about super-symmetric quantum mechanics and integrable systems

I'm an undergraduate interested in theory. I recently asked one of my professors, a physicist in the particle theory group at my school, if he'd be willing to take on an undergraduate for a senior ...
5
votes
1answer
123 views

Sterile Neutrinos and Supersymmetry

Just read a Scientific American review of a recent article which suggests evidence for sterile neutrinos: ...
2
votes
0answers
199 views

Gossip in Physics

Given, $M_4 = \Sigma \times C$, How do you get an effective theory by studying maps $\Sigma \rightarrow M_4$ . Technically, the physics in one manifold is supposed to gossip about the ...
6
votes
2answers
226 views

Feynman Diagrams in 2 component notation

When using two component notation people often prefer to refrain from using arrows in Feynman diagrams to denote charge flow as is done in four-component notation. Instead, if understand correctly, ...
15
votes
2answers
416 views

Generalized Complex Geometry and Theoretical Physics

I have been wondering about some of the different uses of Generalized Complex Geometry (GCG) in Physics. Without going into mathematical detail (see Gualtieri's thesis for reference), a Generalized ...
5
votes
1answer
126 views

$\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetry and $SU(2)$ holonomy

I was reading this Phys.SE question. I was unable to understand how an $SU(2)$ holonomy would produce $\mathcal{N}=2$ in four dimensions. Could anyone shed some light on this?
2
votes
1answer
116 views

Does a Super Noether Theorem exist?

I am wondering if an extension of Noether theorem to supergroups exists. In particular the analogy with the usual case should be that supersymmmetries are in 1 to 1 correspondence to certain ...
2
votes
0answers
60 views

Why does the object $\epsilon_L Q_L + \epsilon_R Q_R$ correspond to a 16-component conserved supercharge when we have a Dp-brane?

I understand that when a 10-dimensional superstring theory has a Dp-brane (say, extending in the $x_0, ... , x_p$ directions) we have the total conserved supercharge given by: \begin{equation} ...
2
votes
0answers
139 views

Understanding the algebra associated with an implicit potential

In the paper here(page 7-8) the authors make a claim that the Natanzon potential (an implicit potential) follows an $SO(2,2)$ algebra. This potential defined as : $$ U(z(r)) = ...
3
votes
1answer
124 views

Even-branes in IIA and odd-branes in IIB

The R-R sector of IIA and IIB are respectively given as, $8_s \otimes 8_c = [1]\oplus [3] = 8_v \oplus 56_t$ $8_s \otimes 8_s = [0]\oplus [2] \oplus [4]_+ = 1 \oplus 28 \oplus 35_+$ Now looking at ...
1
vote
1answer
79 views

Reference request for supersymmetry [duplicate]

I have a good background in linear algebra, Topology and Differential geometry. I would like to understand the concept of supersymmetry in theoretical physics, and hopefully read Witten's landmark ...
2
votes
0answers
36 views

Twisted supermultiplets

What is a twisted supermultiplet, in a generic supersymmetric theory? Which ordinary fields belong to one of such twisted supermultiplets? I am confident with the idea of a supermultiplet or a ...
10
votes
1answer
480 views

About defining “baryons” and “mesons”

I want to understand the proof of the claims (of the construction as well as of its uniqueness) of gauge singlet states given around equation 2.13 (page 10) of this paper. Also does the listing of ...
1
vote
0answers
72 views

Information about fields and superfields [closed]

I want some explanation of fields and superfields (types and components), and what the relationship between them and representation of a group.
5
votes
1answer
199 views

Why must SUSY be broken?

Background One usually claims that supersymmetry must be spontaneously broken. The reasoning is roughly the following: Since $M^2=P^{\mu}P_{\mu}$ is a casimir operator of the supersymmetry algebra, ...
4
votes
1answer
120 views

Dimensional reduction of Yang-Mills to m(atrix) theory

The Yang-Mills action are usually given by $$S= \int\text{d}^{10}\sigma\,\text{Tr}\left(-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-\theta^{T}\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\theta\right)$$ with the field strength defined ...
4
votes
0answers
92 views

Degrees of freedom in m(atrix) theory

The Hamiltonian for m(atrix) theory is given by $$H=\frac{1}{2\lambda}\text{Tr}\left(P^{a}P_{a}+\frac{1}{2}\left[X^{a},X^{b}\right]^{2}+\theta^{T}\gamma_{a}\left[X^{a},\theta\right]\right).$$ Where ...
3
votes
1answer
94 views

Differential Realizations of certain algebras

I'm a first year graduate student in Mathematical Physics, and I am trying to generalise a certain method involving the so-called "Differential realizations" of certain algebras. The problem I'm ...
8
votes
4answers
505 views

Using supersymmetry outside high energy/particle physics

Are there applications of supersymmetry in other branches of physics other than high energy/particle physics?
4
votes
0answers
99 views

Coleman-Mandula theorem in mathematical language

Every supersymmetry text starts off mentioning the Coleman-Mandula theorem. Often it is introduced using rather colloquial terminology. I was wondering if anyone knew a precise mathematical ...
1
vote
0answers
48 views

Dual photon in d=3

In some papers (such as http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910184 and http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+kapustin+AND+topological+disorder/0/1/0/all/0/1) I am reading it is always referred at "the dual ...
2
votes
0answers
48 views

stress tensor in Kazama-Suzuki construction

This is a technical question about equation (2.42) of the original paper [KS] of the Kazama-Suzuki construction. I think the authors did a simple substitution ...
6
votes
1answer
60 views

How to find SUSY with near-degenerate masses?

In SUSY models, you can have the case that sparticles and their decay products have near-degenerate masses. For example $$ m(\tilde \chi^\pm_1) - m(\tilde \chi^0_1) < 1\,\mathrm{GeV}$$ Then in ...
3
votes
0answers
54 views

$\mathcal{N}=4$ SUSY in $d=3$ versus $\mathcal{N}=2$ in $d=4$

Which is the field content of the hypermultiplet and the vector multiplet in $\mathcal{N}=4 \ d=3$ Supersymmmetry? Is it correct to state that $\mathcal{N}=4$ in $d=3$ has $8$ supercharges, (since ...
7
votes
0answers
113 views

Simple argument for unexpected behavior in SUSY model

Consider a supersymmetric theory with 3 chiral superfields, $X, \Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2,$ with canonical Kahler potential and superpotential $$ W= \frac12 h_1 X\Phi_1^2 +\frac12 h_2 \Phi_2\Phi_1^2 + fX.$$ ...
2
votes
0answers
59 views

What is the 1/2 spin analog of the graviton called?

In some supergravities you have the gravition, gravitino, graviphoton and graviscalar. Each is analogous to each other in only sharing gravitational properties and nothing else. They differ by spin ...
12
votes
1answer
440 views

An unfamiliar way of writing supersymmetry transformations

This question is in relation to this recent paper. I would like to know how the so called supersymmetry transformations at the start of page 27 or at the end of page35 (equation 8.4) or at the end ...
2
votes
1answer
114 views

How to get a $\mathcal{N}=2$ SuperYang-Mills Lagrangian from a quiver

How can one write down the $\mathcal{N}=2$ SuperYang-Mills Lagrangian given a quiver graph? For concreteness consider the quiver $$(2)-(4)-[6]$$ where the node $(2)$ corresponds to a $U(2)$ factor ...
2
votes
1answer
129 views

Evidences against Supersymmetry [closed]

Recently, some experiments show that the supersymmetry is not realised by Nature according to the simple models that we currently have. Nevertheless, it is far from saying that the "game is over" as ...
4
votes
2answers
124 views

What is the experimental status of the G2-MSSM?

The G2-MSSM is supposed to be the low-energy theory of a hypothetical class of M-theory compactifications studied by some phenomenologists. It is just the MSSM, but in a particular region of parameter ...
2
votes
0answers
88 views

Generalized Unitarity cut of Scalar One-loop Box integral

How does one perform the integrals in four particle cuts in generalized unitarity? It would be helpful how one finds solutions to the simplest case, the fully determined box integral given by: ...
8
votes
2answers
347 views

How to prove quantum N=4 Super-Yang-Mills is superconformal?

I'm especially interested in elegant illuminating proofs which don't involve a lot of straightforward technical computations Also, does a non-perturbative proof exist?
8
votes
1answer
197 views

How does the electron electric dipole moment (EDM) depend on supersymmetry?

I have read a recent paper that says that limit on the EDM of the electron has now been measured to 12 times better accuracy. According to that paper, as I understood, there should be a difference in ...
6
votes
1answer
147 views

Supersymmetric generalisation of the bosonic $\sigma$ model in QM

I am reading some lecture notes which demonstrate how various models in SUSY QM can be used to obtain topological invariants such as the Euler characteristic from the Witten Index. The following ...
-1
votes
1answer
131 views

What is a supermultiplet?

In Quantum field theory by Lewis H. Ryder, a supermultiplet is mentioned with no explanation as to what one is.
6
votes
2answers
193 views

What happens if the holonomy group lies in $SU(2)$ for a CY 3-fold?

I am a mathematician and reading a physics paper about the holonomy group of Calabi-Yau 3-folds. In that paper, a Calabi-Yau 3-fold $X$ is defined as a compact 3-dimensional complex manifold with ...
5
votes
1answer
299 views

M(atrix) theory and things other than D0-branes? And is it non-peturbative M-theory or non-peturbative Type IIA theory?

When I first read the BFSS Paper on M(atrix)-theory, I was under the impression that it was a non-peturbative formulation of M-theory. But recently, upon reading this paper of Nathan Seiberg's, I ...