A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

3
votes
1answer
221 views

Supersymmetric Sigma Model

I was working through the Mirror Symmetry book by Clay Math Institute. It deals with supersymmetric sigma model in 10.4 section. It doesn't derive how the action is invariant under the variation. I am ...
6
votes
0answers
237 views

Peskin-Schroeder Problem 3.5, supersymmetric theories regarded as field theories on parameter space w/commuting & anticommuting coordinates?

I know how to do Problem 3.5 of Peskin-Schroeder. Let us organize the fields $\phi$, $\chi_\alpha$, $F$ of Problem 3.5 into a superfield$$\Phi(x + i\theta\sigma\overline{\theta}, \theta) = \phi(x) ...
1
vote
1answer
102 views

What does it mean for an action to be defined “on-shell”?

Some actions like 11D supergravity are defined "on-shell". What does this mean exactly? Can you give me an example? Say for example the Klein-Gordon action. Can this be defined on-shell too?
2
votes
0answers
28 views

Construction of $\mathcal O(-1) \oplus \mathcal O(-1)$ over $CP^1$ [closed]

First, Consider a $\phi$ as a coordinates on a copy of $Z= C^N$ Then, I know \begin{align} |\phi_1|^2 + |\phi_2|^2 + \cdots |\phi_N|^2 = r \end{align} which describe $S^{2N-1}$. Implementing $U(1)$ ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

Supersymmetry breaking and normalizable zero modes

Why does supersymmetry always lead to normalizable zero modes? For example, it is stated in the paper by Michelson and Kaplan (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9510053) that we can assume, without loss of ...
0
votes
0answers
98 views

Jim Gates' discovery of error-correcting codes in equations of supersymmetry

Can anyone explain what's going on here, in a way that isn't just a lot of gee-whiz? Here's the arXiv article. I'm more of a computer science person than a physicist, so error-correcting codes are ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Chiral multiplet : Fundamental and adjoint representation and its Lagrangian

In supersymmetry theory, consider $4d$ $N=1$ theory, we know that chiral superfield (In fundamental representation $\Phi \rightarrow e^{i\alpha} \Phi$) $\Phi$ and its lagrangian is given as ...
6
votes
0answers
276 views

Is there supersymmetry between Dirac and Klein Gordon solutions?

Usually supersymmetry is explained at the level of the action of a quantum field theory, and there are two ways to go down from QFT to relativistic quantum mechanics: either a non-covariant way where ...
9
votes
3answers
2k views

Can someone give a simple expose on Coleman Mandula theorem and what Mandelstam variables are?

Can someone give a simple expose on Coleman Mandula theorem and what Mandelstam variables are? Coleman-Mandula is often cited as being the key theorem that leads us to consider Supersymmetry for ...
2
votes
0answers
142 views

Intuition behind Nekreasov's instanton partition function. What do the partitions represent exactly?

I am struggling to understand many things behind Nekrasov's solution. Firstly I want to understand the following In this theory, $a$ represents VEVs the Higgs scalar. So, is the gauge field of the ...
1
vote
0answers
41 views

M-theory compactified on $S^4$

I am trying to understand what happens to the 32 supersymmetries of M-theory when it is compactified on $S^4$, with the other seven dimensions being flat, e.g., $\mathbb{R^7}$, $\mathbb{R^6} \times ...
0
votes
0answers
12 views

How can we reduce the number of necessary parameter to 19 in phenomenological Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (pMSSM)?

I am very new in SUSY and I heard something about pMSSM. Question is that how we can reduce the number of necessary parameter to 19 in pMSSM. If you have any suggestion as a brief introduction or any ...
1
vote
1answer
41 views

Question about Supermatrix algebra

This question is inspired from a reading of Appendix F of P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergravity, Phys. Rep. 68 (1981) pp. 369-374. Consider a "supermatrix" $$M = \left(\begin{array}{cc} A & B\\ C ...
1
vote
0answers
48 views

M5 brane zero modes

The Euclidean M5 brane worldvolume has an anti self-dual 3-form and two negative chirality spinors. The spinors can couple to the SO(5) gauge fields of the normal bundle, but the 3-form cannot couple ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

Lagrangian for $\mathcal{N}=4$ SQED in 3D

What is the Lagrangian for $3D$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric QED, with $N_f$ hypermultiplets? In particular, which is the form of the Fayet-Iliopulos terms, and the real mass terms?
4
votes
0answers
119 views

Pole in reflection/transmission coefficient and bound states

I was working on a scattering problem in a quantum mechanical system with Hamiltonian $$H_1=A^{\dagger}A=(-\partial_x+W(x))((\partial_x+W(x))).$$ One can show that a 'supersymmetric' partner to this ...
1
vote
0answers
30 views

N=4 d=3 susy algebra

Does anybody know how to derive the $\mathcal{N}=4$ d=3 susy algebra doing a dimensional reduction from the most famous $\mathcal{N}=4$ d=4? Equivalently, does it exist a reference in the literature ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

The BPS mass formula for 3d N=4

Is the mass formula (or equivalently the central charge formula) known for BPS particles in 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ susy gauge theories? In particular, what is its dependence on the Fayet-Iliopoulos ...
1
vote
1answer
141 views

Equation of motion of an auxiliary field

I'm a newbie in the field of QFT and SUSY, so I'm warning you: this might be a stupid question. I'm working with auxiliary fields to describe supersymmetric models and I understand that upon ...
0
votes
1answer
73 views

Meaning of Supersymmetry

Supersymmetry is a relation between bosons and fermions. Based on this definition, what is the meaning of "number of supersymmetries"?
1
vote
0answers
34 views

What are the global symmetries of $\mathcal{N}=2$ SYM before twisting and after twisting?

I am confused with the global symmetries of $\mathcal{N}=2$ SYM. On one hand I know that the theory has a $U(2)_R = SU(2)_R \times U(1)_R$ symmetry. Now, there exists also a $U(1)_B$ global symmetry. ...
0
votes
1answer
304 views

Hermitian conjugate of spinors

In any textbook, hermitian conjugate of spinor is defined like $ \psi_{\alpha}^{+}=\bar\psi_{\dot{\alpha}} $ and $(\psi^{\alpha})^{+}=\bar{\psi}^{\dot\alpha}$. We have Pauli matrices ...
0
votes
0answers
36 views

Diiference between three squashed sphere and three sphere and number of susy

First I know that three sphere $S^3$ and squashed sphere $S_b^3$ \begin{align} S_{b}^{3} = \begin{array} & R^2 \times S_{r}, \quad r=b, \quad b\rightarrow 0 \\ R^2 \times S_{r}, \quad ...
6
votes
0answers
152 views

Can pure-bosonic string theories exist in curved spacetime?

Question: Can there be a consistent non-supersymmetric pure-bosonic string theory in some curved spacetimes? Reason: Since fields with certain amount of negative mass can exist in curved spacetime ...
1
vote
0answers
50 views

Hypermultiplet as BPS particles

In the third paragraph of page 7 of the paper arxiv:1112.3984 it mentions that we form a basis out of hypermultiplets on the charge lattice $\Gamma$. My questions are: In what sense do we form such ...
11
votes
2answers
1k views

Deriving Feynman rules from a Lagrangian for vertex factors for “more complicated” interactions

I am trying to derive Feynman rules from a given Lagrangian and I got stuck on some vertex factors. What for example is the vertex factor that corresponds to the four-scalar interaction that is ...
4
votes
0answers
56 views

Concerning topology of BPS states of the M5-brane

My question is about the M5-brane in M-theory. I would like to know whether the BPS states of the M5-brane worldvolume theory (especially the 1/2 BPS and 1/4 BPS ones) are independent of the topology ...
12
votes
2answers
464 views

Alejandro Rivero's correspondence: diquarks and mesons as superpartners of quarks and leptons

The idea of “hadronic supersymmetry” originated in the mid-1960s and derives from the observation that baryons and mesons have similar Regge slopes, as if antiquarks and diquarks are superpartners. ...
12
votes
2answers
3k views

How can the mass of Higgs give preference to SUSY vs multiverse?

According to the documentary Particle Fever, the precise value of the Higgs boson's mass could give more credence to either SUSY or multiverse theories. If the mass had been 115 GeV or below SUSY ...
6
votes
3answers
442 views

Problems book recommendation on supersymmetry, supergravity and superstring theory

I'm learning supersymmetry, supergravity and superstring. I want some problems books to have some idea in this area. Is there this kind of books? Or are there some papers that have many solved model?
0
votes
0answers
35 views

Can we have supersymmetry using real scalar instead of complex scalars?

I am aware that a suersymmetric theories containing a complex scalar a Weyl fermion and an auxiliary field exist. I was wondering if we can have something analogous using real and not complex scalar ...
3
votes
1answer
563 views

Instantons in Witten's supersymmetry and Morse theory

I'm reading Witten's paper on supersymmetry and Morse theory and am confused about the details of the instanton calculation which he uses to define a Morse complex (beginning at page 11 of the pdf) . ...
7
votes
2answers
18k views

Supersymmetry vs multiverse

I'm a complete noobe in physics and quite honestly need help. My question is simple, based on CERN's tentative findings stating the Higgs boson at a mass of ~125 GeV: Is the physics community leaning ...
1
vote
0answers
74 views

Anomaly polynomial of Hitchin system $\mathcal{N}=2$ 4d SQFT

I would like to ask about mathematical background of this object. So, I am trying to puzzle out with 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SQFT. As far as I can gather this theory can be described in terms of ...
1
vote
1answer
121 views

Canonical spinors from gauge transformations

In this 2006 paper, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610128, there is the concept of gauge transformation and how was it employed that I do not fully understand. Note, what will be talked about below is ...
6
votes
1answer
148 views

Where does the “Supersymmetry” in Witten's proof of the Morse inequalities come from?

Where does the "Supersymmetry" in Witten's proof of the Morse inequalities (original paper and outline of proof for mathematicians) come from? Hopefully someone can provide an intuitive understanding? ...
1
vote
0answers
66 views

Representation theory and the Nekrasov partition function

Is there any review or lecture notes on the Nekrasov partition function which particularly thinks of this from a representation theorist's point of view? Some possibly related references I know of ...
1
vote
1answer
94 views

Dimensional reduction of SUSY theories

I know that if one reduces 10 dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM theory to 4 dimensions one gets $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM. There are other examples also. I have two related questions regarding this fact. ...
1
vote
0answers
98 views

Supersymmetric transformation of general Wess-Zumino Lagrangian

I suspect that I might have understood something wrong here. I'm trying to show that the general Wess-Zumino Lagrangian \begin{align} \mathcal{L} &= \int d^2\theta d^2\bar{\theta} K(\Phi^*, \Phi) ...
1
vote
0answers
52 views

Can i use the $y^*$ representation of the chiral covariant derivatives on a superfield that contains both $y$ and $y^*$?

Imagine I want to compute this $$D^{\dagger2}D_{\alpha}(\Phi^*\Phi)$$ where the $D$-s are super-covariant derivatives and $\Phi$ is a chiral superfield. Following the notation of this review on ...
1
vote
0answers
25 views

Which is the analogous of the unitarity constraint of chiral perturbation theory in superchiral perturbation theory?

I am trying to reconstruct something and I would appreciate omeone helping me filling the gaps. To motivate my question let's first consider chiral perturbation theory with up and down quarks. This is ...
1
vote
0answers
54 views
5
votes
0answers
261 views

Book with solved examples and exercise problems for SUSY

I am learning supersymmetry right now. I am mostly following Bailin and Love. I try to connect all the steps from the book and complete the derivations in order to get comfortable with the ...
3
votes
1answer
88 views

Why must superpartners have the same gauge quantum numbers?

The title leaves it quite clear, why must superpartners have the same gauge quantum numbers?
2
votes
1answer
67 views

What is $\mathcal{N}=2$ QED?

I would like to know is $\mathcal{N}=2$ QED is simply a $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory with gauge group $U(1)$ like in normal QED? If not, exactly what theory is it? Is there some reference for it?
1
vote
1answer
152 views

Should the (On-shell) (2+1)d $N=2$ Chiral Multiplet Contain Two Scalars and Two Majorana Spinors?

In supermultiplets, the bosonic degrees of freedom and the fermionic degrees of freedom need to match in number. The number of degrees of freedom of a field corresponds to the number of independent ...
2
votes
0answers
80 views

(Super)Gauge Fixing in Supersymmetry

I have three questions about gauge fixing in supersymmetry, one is general and the other two explicit: Why gauge fixing seems not important in supersymmetry? By "not important" I mean gauge fixing ...
1
vote
0answers
59 views

Projection that keeps graviton but gets rid of B-field

We consider the closed superstring and the massless states in the (NS,NS)-sector \begin{equation} \tilde{b}^i_{-\frac{1}{2}} |0\rangle_L \otimes b^j_{-\frac{1}{2}} |0\rangle_R. \end{equation} It is ...
2
votes
0answers
545 views

What is special about a 126 GeV Higgs mass?

The 126 GeV Higgs mass seems to be a rather special value, from all the a priori possible values. One thing I've heard is that it is just at the edge of the mass range implying a stable vacuum, and ...
1
vote
1answer
126 views

Quantum mechanic particle

In non relativistic quantum mechanic, we are dealing with a problem involving a particle in one dimensional space, and it has been given the potential and it reads: ...