A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

0
votes
1answer
42 views

To which type of particles gauginos are supposed to couple?

I wonder about to which type of particles gauginos couple in general. I admit my knowledge in supersymmetry is very limited. Let's take an example: The photino. If it behaved similar to the photon, it ...
4
votes
0answers
75 views

Gauging a mixture of internal and spacetime symmetries

Given an internal symmetry, say $U(1)$ or $SU(2)$, I understand how to gauge it, by coupling the conserved current $J_{\mu}$ to a gauge field $A^{\mu}$. Similarly, I understand how to gauge a ...
2
votes
0answers
98 views

Supercovariant Derivative action

My query is with Weinberg Vol3 equation just above 26.7.22 Weinberg follows Majorana Superfield formalism. Where, covariant derivative is defined as, $$D_{R\alpha}=-\epsilon_{\alpha ...
3
votes
1answer
59 views

Decomposing massless N=8 SUGRA multiplet into multiplets of massless N=4

The only massless $N=8$ SUGRA multiplet is given by $(g_{\mu\nu},\psi_\mu^{\Sigma},A_\mu^{[\Sigma\Pi]},\chi_{\alpha}^{[\Sigma\Pi\Lambda]} ,\phi^{[\Sigma\Pi\Lambda\Omega]})$ where the greek upper ...
1
vote
1answer
50 views

Lorentz group in SUSY

Why do we carry Lorentz group to be included also in supersymmetry? That is after we extend our symmetry to supersymmetry, we carry with us the Lorentz group. Why not other group instead?
3
votes
0answers
28 views

Baryonic operators in ${\cal N}=1$ $U(N)$ SQCD in four dimensions

Seiberg's duality is usually considered as a duality for $SU(N_c)$ theories with $N_f$ flavors. In his case, the vacuum for $N_f \geq N_c$ is parameterized by mesons $M$ and baryons ${\bar B}$ and ...
2
votes
1answer
41 views

Why are only certain fluxes allowed in 11D SUGRA?

In Type IIA/IIB string theory we can have various fluxes, such as the 3-form H-flux, and the various Ramond-Ramond fluxes in even/odd dimensions. In 11D SUGRA, however, the field content seems to ...
0
votes
1answer
91 views

Geometry of spacetime and spinor bilinears

In this paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0247) p.20, the author says in the section titled Geometry of spacetime the following: In order to obtain the spacetime geometry, we consider the spinor ...
2
votes
1answer
84 views

Killing vector and one-form [closed]

p. 21 in this paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0247) $V$ is Killing vector, where $V^2 = −4b\bar{b}$, which means it is timelike Killing vector. The authors say: From $V^2 = −4|b|^2$ and $V = ...
1
vote
1answer
61 views

How do we know if a Killing Spinor is Time-like or Null?

How to know whether a Killing spinor orbit is time-like or null? This is present in a paper like this 29/39 here. I'm not asking for a technical answer, just a logical cliche answer chit-chat answer. ...
0
votes
0answers
34 views

Basic Dirac Spinors question

Here p. 25, it says Generically, the space of Dirac spinors has $2^{d/2}$ (complex) components, and one can recast them in terms of the complexified space of forms on $\mathbb{R}^{d/2}$. My ...
1
vote
1answer
74 views

What does $δF=0$ imply?

Please have a look here section 12.6. It says here that Given the action of a supergravity theory, it is generally useful to search for solutions of the classical equations of motion. It is ...
0
votes
2answers
129 views

Why $\delta F = B\epsilon$ and not $F=B \epsilon$ in supersymmetry?

We can express supersymmetric transformations as $$\delta F = B\epsilon, \tag{1} $$ $$\delta B = F\bar{\epsilon},\tag{2}$$ where $B$ and $F$ denote the bosons and fermions, respectively, in the theory ...
0
votes
1answer
101 views

What are susy transformations for N=2 sugra?

Killing spinor equations are equations that result from supersymmetric transformations. One example of those is for example is in $N=2$ Supergravity theories. As suggested by some books and papers on ...
3
votes
1answer
122 views

I do not understand this comparison?

It is frequently discussed that to find solutions having some sort of supersymmetry is easier than solving Einstein’s equations of motion. I do not understand this discussion though. Specifically, ...
1
vote
2answers
150 views

Why supergravity is extension of GR?

Why is it that supergravity is an extension to general relativity? In what ways? What I have read until now says the following: GR got itself concerned with gravity after the revolution of special ...
2
votes
1answer
66 views

Superpotential for Gaussian potential well? [closed]

so I am looking for the super potential of a Gaussian well, namely $V= -e^{-x^2/2}$, and the super potential has to satisfy the Riccati equation,$ − W′ ( x ) + W ( x ) = V ( x ) − a$. Somehow I ...
0
votes
0answers
64 views

Which are some best books to learn supersymmetry?

I am interested in a book that is mathematically precise. I am not expecting a mathematicians book like the one by Deligne.
11
votes
0answers
345 views

Apparent failure of SUSY nonrenormalization theorem

I am having trouble reconciling two pieces of information. Consider supersymmetric QED, i.e. a supersymmetric U(1) gauge theory with two chiral superfields of opposite charges, $h$ and $\hat{h}$. The ...
0
votes
1answer
53 views

Electro-mangetic duality, Quantum electro dynamics and N=4 SYM

This question is extension of Electro magnetic duality, Strong weak duality and N=4 super Yangmils which i asked before. Here what i want to know is compare of QED and N=4 SYM in terms of ...
2
votes
1answer
47 views

Nahm's theorem and related with SYM ;other theories

To study $S$-duality in more detail, i tried to read, Electric-magnetic duality and the Geometric Langlands Program. In section 2.1, there is a comment about 10d SYM. Excerpt from the paper above, ...
1
vote
0answers
50 views

Are SUSY transformations free from anomalies?

Although I've studied supersymmetic field theories for several years, there is a fundamental problem annoying me: Do SUSY transformations (including both the ordinary ones in various dimensions and ...
1
vote
2answers
57 views

How would superpartners explain dark matter? (Supersymmetry)

This is probably very basic but I can't quite find the answer in other questions. As I understand it we are hoping to create supersymmetric particles at the LHC (in this second run) and these ...
1
vote
1answer
62 views

Electro magnetic duality, Strong weak duality and N=4 super Yangmils

How we can interpret this self-dual, or duality in terms of generalized version of electro magneitc duality, or Strong weak duality. Let me address some basic information. First, electro magnetic ...
3
votes
1answer
83 views

Supersymmetry as a solution of hierarchy problem

Hierarchy problem is the statement of why the weak force is much stronger than gravity. In terms of coupling constant, weak force (Fermi coupling) is much larger than gravity (Newton's constant). I ...
3
votes
0answers
86 views

What is the Superpartner of a glass? [closed]

A little context: This summer I visited Switzerland and had the chance to tour CERN. While there, I saw through an open door this question written at the top of a chalkboard in someone's office. I ...
1
vote
1answer
65 views

Seiberg duality and IR fixed point

This question is related with Seiberg duality for $SU(N)$ gauge theory which states a duality between electric theory, $SU(N_c)$ gauge theory with $N_f$ flavors is dual to its magnetic theory, ...
1
vote
0answers
45 views

How can we use Majorana spinors for charged fermions in MSSM?

According to "Supersymmetry in Particle Physics" by Ian Aitchison (see e.g. p62 of arXiv), in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) we can use Majorana language to build supermultiplets: ...
5
votes
1answer
215 views

Is a $SU(2)$ supergauge theory really a $SU(2)$ gauge theory?

Consider $SU(2)$ supergauge theory with $A$, a doublet of two chiral superfields in the fundamental representation. $$A= \begin{pmatrix} \Phi_1\\ \Phi_2 \end{pmatrix}$$ where $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Superpotential Symmetry

Superpotential in general has the form $W=a_n\Phi^n$. If I require that my superpotential should be invariant under the following global transformation, $\delta \Phi=i\epsilon \Phi$ and $\delta ...
1
vote
0answers
25 views

What exactly is the “diagonal embedding” in the supersymmetric topological twist?

Consider $\mathcal{N}=2$ pure SYM theory. If we want to put the theory in a 4-manifold we take its topological twist. The global symmetry group $$G= SU(2)_{+} \times SU(2)_{-} \times SU(2)_I \times ...
4
votes
1answer
126 views

Soft SUSY breaking fermion mass terms in MSSM for matter fields

In the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, the chiral fermion fields (the Higgsinos) don't have any soft SUSY breaking mass terms and soft SUSY breaking trilinear interactions while their scalar ...
2
votes
2answers
103 views

ΧΕΝΟΝ1Τ: Will it fail to discover DM? Why is it necessary? What benefits for society?

Since a new experiment (ΧΕΝΟΝ1Τ) will take place in Italy to directly detect WIMPs and since there are already many experiments trying to do the same or something similar (e.g. CERN LHC, LUX, CoGent, ...
1
vote
1answer
66 views

State counting in the d = 1+2, $\cal{N} = 2$ vector multiplet

The question is from Box 8.2, page 282 of the book "Gauge Gravity Duality" by Ammon and Erdmenger. The link to the specific page from Google Books is here. According to the authors, a $\mathcal{N} = ...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

Matching bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom in Wess-Zumino Lagrangian

In Wess-Zumino model, supersymmetric Lagrangian in addition to the ordinary complex scalar field $\phi$ contains auxiliary field $F$ (also complex scalar) to match the degrees of freedom of the Weyl ...
6
votes
0answers
238 views

Peskin-Schroeder Problem 3.5, supersymmetric theories regarded as field theories on parameter space w/commuting & anticommuting coordinates?

I know how to do Problem 3.5 of Peskin-Schroeder. Let us organize the fields $\phi$, $\chi_\alpha$, $F$ of Problem 3.5 into a superfield$$\Phi(x + i\theta\sigma\overline{\theta}, \theta) = \phi(x) ...
1
vote
1answer
102 views

What does it mean for an action to be defined “on-shell”?

Some actions like 11D supergravity are defined "on-shell". What does this mean exactly? Can you give me an example? Say for example the Klein-Gordon action. Can this be defined on-shell too?
2
votes
0answers
28 views

Construction of $\mathcal O(-1) \oplus \mathcal O(-1)$ over $CP^1$ [closed]

First, Consider a $\phi$ as a coordinates on a copy of $Z= C^N$ Then, I know \begin{align} |\phi_1|^2 + |\phi_2|^2 + \cdots |\phi_N|^2 = r \end{align} which describe $S^{2N-1}$. Implementing $U(1)$ ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

Supersymmetry breaking and normalizable zero modes

Why does supersymmetry always lead to normalizable zero modes? For example, it is stated in the paper by Michelson and Kaplan (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9510053) that we can assume, without loss of ...
0
votes
0answers
98 views

Jim Gates' discovery of error-correcting codes in equations of supersymmetry

Can anyone explain what's going on here, in a way that isn't just a lot of gee-whiz? Here's the arXiv article. I'm more of a computer science person than a physicist, so error-correcting codes are ...
0
votes
0answers
50 views

Chiral multiplet : Fundamental and adjoint representation and its Lagrangian

In supersymmetry theory, consider $4d$ $N=1$ theory, we know that chiral superfield (In fundamental representation $\Phi \rightarrow e^{i\alpha} \Phi$) $\Phi$ and its lagrangian is given as ...
6
votes
0answers
276 views

Is there supersymmetry between Dirac and Klein Gordon solutions?

Usually supersymmetry is explained at the level of the action of a quantum field theory, and there are two ways to go down from QFT to relativistic quantum mechanics: either a non-covariant way where ...
2
votes
0answers
142 views

Intuition behind Nekreasov's instanton partition function. What do the partitions represent exactly?

I am struggling to understand many things behind Nekrasov's solution. Firstly I want to understand the following In this theory, $a$ represents VEVs the Higgs scalar. So, is the gauge field of the ...
1
vote
0answers
41 views

M-theory compactified on $S^4$

I am trying to understand what happens to the 32 supersymmetries of M-theory when it is compactified on $S^4$, with the other seven dimensions being flat, e.g., $\mathbb{R^7}$, $\mathbb{R^6} \times ...
0
votes
0answers
12 views

How can we reduce the number of necessary parameter to 19 in phenomenological Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (pMSSM)?

I am very new in SUSY and I heard something about pMSSM. Question is that how we can reduce the number of necessary parameter to 19 in pMSSM. If you have any suggestion as a brief introduction or any ...
1
vote
1answer
41 views

Question about Supermatrix algebra

This question is inspired from a reading of Appendix F of P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Supergravity, Phys. Rep. 68 (1981) pp. 369-374. Consider a "supermatrix" $$M = \left(\begin{array}{cc} A & B\\ C ...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

Lagrangian for $\mathcal{N}=4$ SQED in 3D

What is the Lagrangian for $3D$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric QED, with $N_f$ hypermultiplets? In particular, which is the form of the Fayet-Iliopulos terms, and the real mass terms?
1
vote
0answers
48 views

M5 brane zero modes

The Euclidean M5 brane worldvolume has an anti self-dual 3-form and two negative chirality spinors. The spinors can couple to the SO(5) gauge fields of the normal bundle, but the 3-form cannot couple ...
4
votes
0answers
119 views

Pole in reflection/transmission coefficient and bound states

I was working on a scattering problem in a quantum mechanical system with Hamiltonian $$H_1=A^{\dagger}A=(-\partial_x+W(x))((\partial_x+W(x))).$$ One can show that a 'supersymmetric' partner to this ...
1
vote
0answers
30 views

N=4 d=3 susy algebra

Does anybody know how to derive the $\mathcal{N}=4$ d=3 susy algebra doing a dimensional reduction from the most famous $\mathcal{N}=4$ d=4? Equivalently, does it exist a reference in the literature ...