A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

1
vote
0answers
64 views

Why are symmetrical structures highly stable?

What makes symmetrical structures(geometry) highly stable? It is perfect to say that the forces acting on a symmetrical structure is balanced and hence stable. But why is it so? To be more specific, ...
0
votes
1answer
29 views

Why must SUSY be broken in SUGRA inflation?

Why must supersymmetry be broken during the inflation in supergravity models? How does adding supersymmetry to power-law or Starobinsky models spoil inflation? And is breaking of SUSY needed for ...
0
votes
0answers
24 views

$R$-Symmetry Group

On p238/239 of the Freedman and van Proeyen book on Supergravity, they show how the $R$-symmetry group must be $U(\mathcal{N})$ for $\mathcal{N}$-extended supersymmetry in $d=4$. At the bottom of ...
0
votes
0answers
22 views

Tranformation of a spinor in the self representation and conjugate representation of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The transformation rules for a spinors as per Introduction to Supersymmetry by Wiedamann on Pg.38 is be summarized as: $$\begin{align} \psi_{\alpha} \mapsto \psi'_{\alpha} &= M_{\alpha}^{\beta}...
2
votes
1answer
84 views

Question about the superconformal index

According to arXiv:1507.08553v1, the superconformal index, defined by $$I(\beta_j) = \mbox{Tr}_{\mathcal{H}}(-1)^F e^{-\gamma\{Q,Q^\dagger\}}e^{-\sum_{j}\beta_j t_j}$$ is independent of the ...
2
votes
0answers
41 views

What do different supercharges corrrespond to? Is creation mathematically close to fock space?

We may have $I =1,2,..N$ where it is said that this corresponds to $N$ supercharges, $Q^I$. By the supersymmetry algebra, $$[M_{\mu\nu},{\overline{Q}}^{I\dot{\alpha}}] = i(\sigma_{\mu\nu}){^{\dot{\...
0
votes
1answer
51 views

Coleman Mandula theorem and translations

I don't know what Coleman Mandula theorem is, however if I were forced to say something about it, I will say it is a statement that suggests that internal and spatial symmetries have no unique ...
3
votes
0answers
55 views

Physical meaning of the Morse functions? [closed]

What is the physical correspondence of the Morse functions in a physical system? Currently I am studying Mirror symmetry but I can not get a physical intuition out of it.
3
votes
0answers
67 views

How do I obtain the SUSY Transformations from Poisson Brackets?

In Friedman's and Van Proyen's Supergravity textbook it is explained how one can get the supersymmetry transformations using the conserved currents. Specifically this is in section 6 where we are ...
1
vote
1answer
58 views

Supertrace of holonomy of commutator

On page 47 of Surface operators in four-dimensional topological gauge theory and Langlands duality by Kapustin et al., the following expression is given \begin{equation} \delta\mathcal{N}=d(\omega_\...
0
votes
0answers
26 views

Femionic vacuum expectation value

To have maximally symmetric space-time (Minkowski, dS and AdS), why should we have zero vacuum expectation value for fermionic fields?
0
votes
0answers
38 views

Number of components of a One-Form Superfield

A Supersymmetric Yang Mills theory has 8 bosonic and 8 fermionic components. Since SUSY YM Theory is described via the Vector Superfield, $$V=C(x)+i\theta\chi(x)-i\bar{\theta}\bar{\chi}(x) \dots.$$ ...
2
votes
1answer
69 views

Problems with covariant action of the superstring

I was reading Kiritsis notes (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9709062), at page 105/106 (equation 10.1), where he has a covariant action of the superstring including the gravitino. I have problems showing ...
1
vote
1answer
252 views

Differences between Goldstone bosons and fermions

I have been looking into basic SUSY and SUGRA theory and have a question relating to Goldstinos (particles giving gravitinos mass). Simply are these analogous to Goldstone bosons produced in the ...
7
votes
1answer
110 views

Is there a soft Goldstino theorem?

For ordinary spontaneously broken symmetries, you can demonstrate relations between S-matrix elements with a soft goldstone emission and another S-matrix element without the emission. If I break ...
4
votes
1answer
128 views

Soft SUSY breaking fermion mass terms in MSSM for matter fields

In the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, the chiral fermion fields (the Higgsinos) don't have any soft SUSY breaking mass terms and soft SUSY breaking trilinear interactions while their scalar ...
0
votes
1answer
42 views

To which type of particles gauginos are supposed to couple?

I wonder about to which type of particles gauginos couple in general. I admit my knowledge in supersymmetry is very limited. Let's take an example: The photino. If it behaved similar to the photon, it ...
1
vote
2answers
70 views

Why torsion vanishes in supergravity?

Why is it (more often than not) considered in supergravity that the torsion vanishes in Cartan's first structure equation? What does the vanishing of the torsion imply?
2
votes
1answer
34 views

Question about the expression of Witten Index

I am studying supersymmetry by myself. I do not understand the expression of Witten index, which is ${\rm Tr}(-1)^{F}$. What does it mean by writing $-1$ to the power of an operator $F$? Is this ...
0
votes
1answer
90 views

Susy transformation for gauge multiplet

How can the supersymmetrie transformation $\delta A_\mu = \frac{1}{2} \overline{\epsilon}\gamma_\mu \psi $ be derived from the susy algebra ( or group ). Where $ (A_\mu , \psi)$ are in a gauge ...
1
vote
1answer
66 views

What are anticommuting spinor parameters $\zeta^\alpha$?

I'm reading Martin F.Sohnius, Introducing supersymmetry, page 82. It is the first time he introduces the anticommuting spinor parameters $\zeta^\alpha$ to calculate the supersymmetry variations of a ...
0
votes
2answers
131 views

Why $\delta F = B\epsilon$ and not $F=B \epsilon$ in supersymmetry?

We can express supersymmetric transformations as $$\delta F = B\epsilon, \tag{1} $$ $$\delta B = F\bar{\epsilon},\tag{2}$$ where $B$ and $F$ denote the bosons and fermions, respectively, in the theory ...
0
votes
1answer
94 views

Geometry of spacetime and spinor bilinears

In this paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0247) p.20, the author says in the section titled Geometry of spacetime the following: In order to obtain the spacetime geometry, we consider the spinor ...
6
votes
1answer
237 views

Invariance of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory under supersymmetry

I was following Brink, Scherk and Schwartz, "Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories". The variation of the Lagrangian w.r.t a supersymmetry transformation can be reduced to $$ \delta L = -igf_{a b c} \bar{...
3
votes
1answer
80 views

Semi-infinite forms?

I am reading Vafa's paper 'Topological Mirros and Quantum Strings'. In this paper, the author says the Hilbert Space of a fermionic string theory corresponds to the space of semi-infinite forms on the ...
1
vote
1answer
60 views

contraction of the spinor F with a conjugate spino $\bar{\epsilon}$ is bosonic?

In this Why $\delta F = B\epsilon$ and not $F=B \epsilon$ in supersymmetry?, I asked ACuriousMind why would one epsilon be without a bar and the other with a bar here: $$\delta F = B\epsilon, \tag{1} $...
3
votes
1answer
75 views

Fayet-Iliopoulos terms

It is mentioned in first page of this paper by Seiberg and Komargodski that the Lagrangian in superspace of a $U(1)$ gauge SUSY theory with FI terms is not gauge invariant. However, the FI terms in ...
1
vote
1answer
66 views

State counting in the d = 1+2, $\cal{N} = 2$ vector multiplet

The question is from Box 8.2, page 282 of the book "Gauge Gravity Duality" by Ammon and Erdmenger. The link to the specific page from Google Books is here. According to the authors, a $\mathcal{N} = ...
3
votes
0answers
19 views

How does one determine the genus of the ultraviolet curve from Seiberg-Witten curve?

In Gaiotto's construction of 4d ${\cal N}=2$ theories, one starts with 6d (2,0) theory and compactify it on the Riemann surface, which is called the ultraviolet curve of the ${\cal N}=2$ theory. In ...
1
vote
0answers
21 views

Supersymmetric variation of $F$ term using super Jacobi identity [closed]

Basically, i am solving problems in note with a slightly different notation. \begin{align} [Q_\alpha F] = -i \lambda_\alpha (x), \quad [ \bar{Q}_{\dot{\alpha}},F] = -i \bar{\chi}_{\dot{\alpha}} \...
2
votes
0answers
98 views

Supercovariant Derivative action

My query is with Weinberg Vol3 equation just above 26.7.22 Weinberg follows Majorana Superfield formalism. Where, covariant derivative is defined as, $$D_{R\alpha}=-\epsilon_{\alpha \beta}\frac{\...
4
votes
0answers
77 views

Gauging a mixture of internal and spacetime symmetries

Given an internal symmetry, say $U(1)$ or $SU(2)$, I understand how to gauge it, by coupling the conserved current $J_{\mu}$ to a gauge field $A^{\mu}$. Similarly, I understand how to gauge a space-...
3
votes
1answer
59 views

Decomposing massless N=8 SUGRA multiplet into multiplets of massless N=4

The only massless $N=8$ SUGRA multiplet is given by $(g_{\mu\nu},\psi_\mu^{\Sigma},A_\mu^{[\Sigma\Pi]},\chi_{\alpha}^{[\Sigma\Pi\Lambda]} ,\phi^{[\Sigma\Pi\Lambda\Omega]})$ where the greek upper ...
1
vote
1answer
52 views

Lorentz group in SUSY

Why do we carry Lorentz group to be included also in supersymmetry? That is after we extend our symmetry to supersymmetry, we carry with us the Lorentz group. Why not other group instead?
3
votes
0answers
29 views

Baryonic operators in ${\cal N}=1$ $U(N)$ SQCD in four dimensions

Seiberg's duality is usually considered as a duality for $SU(N_c)$ theories with $N_f$ flavors. In his case, the vacuum for $N_f \geq N_c$ is parameterized by mesons $M$ and baryons ${\bar B}$ and $B$....
3
votes
2answers
238 views

Learning about super-symmetric quantum mechanics and integrable systems

I'm an undergraduate interested in theory. I recently asked one of my professors, a physicist in the particle theory group at my school, if he'd be willing to take on an undergraduate for a senior ...
47
votes
0answers
2k views

On the Coulomb branch of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theory

The chiral ring of the Coulomb branch of a 4D $N=2$ supersymmetric gauge theory is given by the Casimirs of the vector multiplet scalars, and they don't have non-trivial relations; the Casimirs are ...
2
votes
1answer
42 views

Why are only certain fluxes allowed in 11D SUGRA?

In Type IIA/IIB string theory we can have various fluxes, such as the 3-form H-flux, and the various Ramond-Ramond fluxes in even/odd dimensions. In 11D SUGRA, however, the field content seems to ...
3
votes
0answers
87 views

Projective superspace: why extra bosonic coordinates

I'm studying the projective superspace formalism for N = 4 supersymmetric $\sigma$-models in two dimensions. My question is: why do we need the extra bosonic coordinates for the manifest action? I ...
2
votes
1answer
85 views

Killing vector and one-form [closed]

p. 21 in this paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0247) $V$ is Killing vector, where $V^2 = −4b\bar{b}$, which means it is timelike Killing vector. The authors say: From $V^2 = −4|b|^2$ and $V = ∂...
8
votes
1answer
273 views

What is the relation between the representation the Higgs field transforms under, the types of couplings in the theory and Higgs/Coulomb branches?

When reading about Higgs and Coulomb 'phases' I came across two separate definitions: The first tells us that the Higgs/Coulomb phases are determined by the representation that the Higgs field ...
0
votes
0answers
34 views

Basic Dirac Spinors question

Here p. 25, it says Generically, the space of Dirac spinors has $2^{d/2}$ (complex) components, and one can recast them in terms of the complexified space of forms on $\mathbb{R}^{d/2}$. My ...
0
votes
1answer
102 views

What are susy transformations for N=2 sugra?

Killing spinor equations are equations that result from supersymmetric transformations. One example of those is for example is in $N=2$ Supergravity theories. As suggested by some books and papers on ...
1
vote
1answer
75 views

What does $δF=0$ imply?

Please have a look here section 12.6. It says here that Given the action of a supergravity theory, it is generally useful to search for solutions of the classical equations of motion. It is ...
1
vote
2answers
152 views

Why supergravity is extension of GR?

Why is it that supergravity is an extension to general relativity? In what ways? What I have read until now says the following: GR got itself concerned with gravity after the revolution of special ...
3
votes
1answer
123 views

I do not understand this comparison?

It is frequently discussed that to find solutions having some sort of supersymmetry is easier than solving Einstein’s equations of motion. I do not understand this discussion though. Specifically, ...
2
votes
1answer
66 views

Superpotential for Gaussian potential well? [closed]

so I am looking for the super potential of a Gaussian well, namely $V= -e^{-x^2/2}$, and the super potential has to satisfy the Riccati equation,$ − W′ ( x ) + W ( x ) = V ( x ) − a$. Somehow I ...
0
votes
0answers
65 views

Which are some best books to learn supersymmetry?

I am interested in a book that is mathematically precise. I am not expecting a mathematicians book like the one by Deligne.
0
votes
1answer
53 views

Electro-mangetic duality, Quantum electro dynamics and N=4 SYM

This question is extension of Electro magnetic duality, Strong weak duality and N=4 super Yangmils which i asked before. Here what i want to know is compare of QED and N=4 SYM in terms of electro-...
2
votes
1answer
48 views

Nahm's theorem and related with SYM ;other theories

To study $S$-duality in more detail, i tried to read, Electric-magnetic duality and the Geometric Langlands Program. In section 2.1, there is a comment about 10d SYM. Excerpt from the paper above, ...