The tag has no usage guidance.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

5
votes
0answers
206 views

What is the point of path integral for boson and fermion?

I am a beginner to study QFT and confused about path integral for boson or fermion. I have read about the path integral for single particle, and finished some problems. But I cannot understand the ...
5
votes
0answers
134 views

Has hep-th/0312070 forgotten to fix $s_{0} = 1/2$ for the fermionic states in the second table on page 52?

Link to the original paper: The Gauge/String Correspondence Towards Realistic Gauge Theories (arXiv paper) On page 52 we see that, for a theory of Dp-branes placed at an orbifold (orbifold = ...
4
votes
2answers
239 views

A whole lot of doubts on Lorentz representation

Can someone tell me in layman's language how the $(1/2,1/2)$ represents a vector field and $(0,1/2)$ or $(1/2,0)$ represents spinors and $(0,0)$ represents scalar field. Please don't be pedantic on ...
4
votes
2answers
173 views

BRST transformation of adjoint spinor

in Yang-Mills-Theory with matter fields a dirac spinor $\psi$ transforms under BRST as $$\psi \to \delta_\Omega\psi=i\eta\psi $$ with $\eta$ being a ghost field. If I want to get the transformation of ...
4
votes
1answer
161 views

Two conflicting definitions of chirality

Consider a Majorana fermion embedded in a Dirac spinor, $$\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ i \sigma_2 \psi_L^* \end{pmatrix}.$$ The Majorana fermion $\psi_L$ is left-chiral, i.e. it transforms in the ...
4
votes
2answers
59 views

Helicities in electron-positron annihilation

Consider the massless limit of a process in which an electron-positron pair annihilates into a virtual photon - the final state doesn't matter. If the electron is massless (or if the energy is high ...
4
votes
1answer
241 views

Is the Dirac equation equivalent to the Klein-Gordon equation for its left handed component?

The Dirac equation $$(i\gamma^a\partial_a - m)\psi=0\tag{0}$$ is given by a first order operator acting on a Dirac spinor, which is the direct sum of a left handed spinor and a right handed spinor. ...
4
votes
1answer
363 views

How can a left-handed fermion field create a right-handed antifermion?

My question - which is likely stupid or appears due to some confusion - stems from the following considerations: when quantizing canonically we are told (see any book on QFT) that a Dirac fermion ...
4
votes
1answer
475 views

The correspondence between Grassmann number and 4-spinor

In canonical quantization, we view the Dirac field $\psi$ as a $4\times1$ matrix of complex number. While in path integral quantization, we view the Dirac field $\psi$ as a Grassmann number. For two ...
4
votes
3answers
154 views

How to show the invariant nature of some value by the group theory representations?

Let's have Dirac spinor $\Psi (x)$. It transforms as $\left( \frac{1}{2}, 0 \right) \oplus \left( 0, \frac{1}{2} \right)$ representation of the Lorentz group: $$ \Psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{a} \\ ...
4
votes
1answer
212 views

Why must these Spinors be normalized?

I have just begun studying spin and there are two spinors mentioned: The main spinor $\chi $ and the spin-up spin down spinors (eigenspinors) $\chi_+ ,\chi_- $. I learned that the main spinor is a ...
4
votes
1answer
150 views

Anti-symmetric forms on Dirac spinors

In order to describe invariant forms on Dirac spinors $S$ one can find trivial subrepresentations in $S \otimes S$. If we use $S \cong (1/2, 0) \oplus (0, 1/2)$ then \begin{multline} [(1/2, 0) ...
4
votes
1answer
618 views

Components of the Weyl spinor field

In the Weyl basis we can separate the spinor field into 2 components: the right-chiral spinor and the left-chiral spinor. Each of these fields has again 2 components which are coupled. What is the ...
4
votes
1answer
232 views

Helicity Representation of Massive Spinor

For massless spinors case we can decompose momentum into Weyl sub-parts as $$p = \lambda_{a}\tilde \lambda_{\dot a}.$$ But for the case of massive fermions can I do something like this? Decompose ...
4
votes
1answer
194 views

What is the definition of precession (in the context of Spinors)?

What is the definition of "precession"? How is it applicable to abstract objects such as Spinors? I understand the mathematics, but don't understand what one means by "precession angle" etc when it ...
4
votes
1answer
121 views

Hermiticity of Dirac operator in curved spacetime

The Dirac Lagrangian in curved spacetime is usually given by \begin{equation} \mathcal{L} = i\bar{\Psi}\gamma^a e^{\mu}_a(\partial_\mu + \frac{1}{4}\omega_{\mu bc}\gamma^b\gamma^c)\Psi \end{equation} ...
4
votes
0answers
68 views

How many Killing spinors exist on $S^5$?

So, I know that on $S^n$, a spinor of the form $$ \Sigma^\pm = \frac{1 \pm i\gamma^\alpha z_\alpha}{\sqrt{1+z^2}}\Sigma_0$$ where $\Sigma_0$ is a constant spinor, is a Killing spinor on $S^n$ ...
3
votes
2answers
3k views

parallel/anti-parallel vs. triplet/singlet description of two spins

If we consider two spins, we can think of the spins as being either parallel (up|up or down|down)or anti-parallel (up|down or down|up). Or we can think of them as being in the triplet or singlet ...
3
votes
1answer
495 views

How can it be derived that particles described by the Dirac equation must have spin 1/2?

I am reading some lecture notes that unfortunately don't seem to be available online, but that are quite close in spirit in their treatment of the Dirac equation to Sakurai's "Advanced Quantum ...
3
votes
2answers
585 views

An identity of Pauli matrices

I am studying spin recently, and textbook gives some identities of Pauli matrices, one said that for any two unit vectors $\bf m$ and $\bf n$, $[\bf m \cdot \bf{\sigma},\bf {n \cdot \sigma}]= ...
3
votes
1answer
471 views

Generalization of De Rham cohomology for spinor fields

I am interested in possible generalizations of The De Rham cohomology for spinor fields. I am also interested in applications to physics such as in the construction of topological charges I can see ...
3
votes
1answer
436 views

Why do we assume that Dirac spinor $\Psi$ describe the particle, not the field?

It is a well-known fact that Klein-Gordon scalar $\Psi(x)$, $$ (\partial^{2} + m^2) \Psi (x) = 0 $$ as well as 4-vector $A_{\mu}(x)$, $$ (\partial^{2} + m^{2})A_{\mu} = 0,\quad ...
3
votes
1answer
101 views

Why must the supersymmetry generators be spinors?

I have read in a few places (for example, at page 5 here) that the supersymmetry generators must be spinors. Quoting the reference mentioned The generator of the symmetry must relate two types of ...
3
votes
1answer
467 views

Evolution of Eigenstates when two spin systems are coupled

I would like to describe the following situation: We have two spin systems: Spin 1 ($S_1$) and Spin 1/2 ($S_2$). Now imagine you somehow change their interaction so that you can fine-tune the ...
3
votes
2answers
254 views

Why is the $(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})$ representation of the Lorentz group realized as the vector space of complex $2\times 2$ matrices?

Why can we write an arbitrary object $v_{a \dot{b} }$ our transformations in this basis act on as $$ v_{a \dot{b} } = v_{\nu} \sigma^{ \nu}_{a \dot{b} } = v^0 \begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\ 0&1 ...
3
votes
1answer
298 views

Treating the spinors as Grassmann numbers or as c-number objects

In the literature on supersymmetry, the following spinor summation convention is often used (eg. Wess & Bagger's book Supersymmetry and Supergravity) $$ \psi\chi = \psi^{\alpha}\chi_{\alpha} = ...
3
votes
1answer
71 views

How is $\varepsilon_+^\mu(p) = \bar{v}(k) \gamma^\mu u(p)$ derived?

The relation $$\varepsilon_+^\mu(p) = \bar{v}(k) \gamma^\mu u(p)$$ is sometimes used to ease calculations of Feynman amplitudes with external gluons (see for example here at (2.13)). Where does this ...
3
votes
1answer
229 views

Motivation for spinors

After it was found that the gamma matrices couldn't be Pauli matrices and only had to be larger and even, why was their need to define a new algebraic object (i.e a Dirac spinor)? Why couldn't a ...
3
votes
1answer
269 views

The relationship between spin and spinor curvature

The identity, $$ -\gamma^b{\mathcal{R}}_{ab} = {\mathcal{R}}_{ab}\gamma^b = \frac{1}{2}\gamma^b R_{ab}$$ is presented in the answer to the question Dirac Equation in General Relativity. How does ...
3
votes
2answers
268 views

Wavefunction of an electron

Electron is a spin $\frac{1}{2}$ particle, so needs 2-component wave function but the Dirac theory of electron is based on 4-component wave function, are all components of it independent or only two ...
3
votes
1answer
247 views

Connection between particles and fields and spinor representation of the Poincare group

Let's have a definition of massive particle as an irreucible representation of the Poincare group. Then, let's have a spinor field $\psi_{\alpha \alpha_{1}...\alpha_{n - 1}\dot {\beta} \dot ...
3
votes
1answer
247 views

Inner product of particle-anti-particle spinor components

Suppose I have four-component spinors $\Psi$ and $\bar \Psi$ satisfying the Dirac equation with $$\Psi(\vec x) = \int \frac{\textrm{d}^3 p}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 E_{\vec p}}} \sum_{s = \pm ...
3
votes
1answer
1k views

How to construct the charge conjugation matrix for any given dimension?

Generally, Gamma matrices could be constructed based on the Clifford algebra. \begin{equation} \gamma^{i}\gamma^{j}+\gamma^{j}\gamma^{i}=2h^{ij}, \end{equation} My question is how to generally ...
3
votes
1answer
382 views

Twistor notation in space-time (Part 1)

This is sort of a continuation of this and this previous discussions. In the first of my links one sees the surjective isometry between real or complex $(1,3)$ signature Minkowski space and the real ...
3
votes
1answer
377 views

Spinor integration

I am learning on-shell methods for one loop integrals from this paper: Loop amplitudes in gauge theory: modern analytic approaches by Britto. Starting with formula (18) spinor integration is ...
3
votes
2answers
577 views

Four vectors from spinors

In Exercise 2.3 of A modern introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Michele Maggiore I am asked to show that, if $\xi_R$ and $\psi_R$ are right-handed spinors, then $$ V^\mu = \xi_R^\dagger \sigma^\mu ...
3
votes
1answer
64 views

Confusion with chirality eigenstates

In the Weyl/chiral basis, the four components of the Dirac spinor represent left-chirality spin up, left-chirality spin down, right-chirality spin up, and right-chirality spin down, respectively. When ...
3
votes
2answers
90 views

Different definitions of spinors

Recently I've read a little about the description of particles with spin in the book Quantum Mechanics by Cohen-Tannoudji. Although I yet didn't fully study the subject, I've read one interesting part ...
3
votes
2answers
140 views

Spinor field normalisation from poles in the propagator

In the theory of free scalar bosons (KG field) it is a basic result that the propagator $\Delta(p)$ has poles at $p^2=m^2$, with residue $1$ (or any other constant, depending on conventions). Thinking ...
3
votes
1answer
126 views

what does Peskin's square root of a matric mean?

Peskin (Intro to QFT) is using the next symbols when discussing dirac fields - $\sqrt{p\sigma}$ with $\sigma = (1,\sigma^1,\sigma^2,\sigma^3)$ (unit & Pauli). For example he represents the dirac ...
3
votes
1answer
86 views

Variation of the kinetic quark term of the QCD Lagrangian under gauge transformation

A simple kinetic quark term would look like $$\bar{\psi}(\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} - m){\psi}.$$ Imposing SU(3) symmetry the Dirac spinor transforms like $$\psi(x) \rightarrow \psi'(x) = e^{ig_s ...
3
votes
1answer
144 views

How does the Lorentz group act on a 4-vector in the spinor-helicity formalism $p_{\alpha\dot{\alpha}}$?

Given a 4-vector $p^\mu$ the Lorentz group acts on it in the vector representation: $$ \tag{1} p^\mu \longrightarrow (J_V[\Lambda])^\mu_{\,\,\nu} p^\nu\equiv \Lambda^\mu_{\,\,\nu} p^\nu. $$ However, I ...
3
votes
2answers
266 views

Electromagnetic current for interaction with Dirac spinors

The covariant form of the Dirac equation is given by $$(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} - M) \Psi(x) = 0 $$ Einstein's summation is implied here, $x=(x^0,x^1,x^2,x^3)^T$. I am simply looking for the ...
3
votes
1answer
187 views

An identity for spinor helicity formalism

I have a question about the spinor helicity formalism from arXiv:1308.1697 Denote the massless spin-1/2 fermions as Eqs. (2.10)-(2.11) in that paper $$v_+(p)= \begin{pmatrix} |p]_a \\ 0 ...
3
votes
1answer
206 views

Parity violating Dirac particle

We normally write down the Dirac Lagrangian as \begin{equation} {\cal L} _D = \bar{\psi} ( i \partial _\mu \gamma ^\mu - m ) \psi \end{equation} but are the Lagrangian's, \begin{equation} ...
3
votes
1answer
481 views

Unitary Lorentz transformation on quantized Dirac spinor

I am stuck again on page 59 of Peskin and Schroeder. In particular, I do not know how they get equation (3.110). Let me first give some background in the way that I understand it (but I might be ...
3
votes
1answer
366 views

Why do we use spinors for describing fermions?

I.e., what properties of the spinors gives us a reason for using them for describing of wavefunctions of fermions?
3
votes
1answer
295 views

How quantum field transforms in case of some particular spin

Except when a particle is spin-0, field of all particles transforms when frame of reference is changed, and this defines what spin is. The question is, specifically how does the quantum field ...
3
votes
1answer
314 views

Symmetrical Spinors and Symmetrical Tensors

In Quantum Electrodynamics by Landau and Lifshiz there is the following: The correspondence between the spinor $\zeta^{\alpha \dot{\beta}}$ and the 4-vector is a particular case of a general ...
3
votes
2answers
77 views

Bilinears in adjoint representation

Below are two statements from my notes and I am trying to verify them explicitly. In both cases the fields are assumed to transform under the fundamental representation of $O(N)$ - --'The kinetic ...