The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

0
votes
1answer
34 views

Canonical spinors from gauge transformations

In this 2006 paper, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610128, there is the concept of gauge transformation and how was it employed that I do not fully understand. Note, what will be talked about below is ...
0
votes
1answer
43 views

Do the eigenstates of the Pauli operators correspond to the six directions of the 3D world?

I understand that the six eigenstates of the three Pauli operators $X, Y, Z$ correspond to the six poles of the Bloch sphere. By fixing an orthonormal basis of our physical word, does "measuring Pauli ...
1
vote
1answer
36 views

Covariant derivative commutator on spinors [on hold]

What is this object $[\nabla_{\mu},\nabla_{\nu}]\epsilon$ in terms of curvature tensor $R_{\mu\nu}$? Where $\nabla_{\mu}$ is the covariant derivative on a four sphere and $\epsilon$ is spinor. PS: I ...
0
votes
1answer
54 views

Regarding the Weyl spinor and its transformation properties

I am trying to prove the Lorentz invariance of the (left-handed) Weyl Lagrangian: $$\mathcal L=i\psi^\dagger\bar\sigma^\mu\partial_\mu\psi$$ A Lorentz transformation is realized as $\psi\to M\psi$, ...
2
votes
1answer
390 views

How can it be derived that particles described by the Dirac equation must have spin 1/2?

I am reading some lecture notes that unfortunately don't seem to be available online, but that are quite close in spirit in their treatment of the Dirac equation to Sakurai's "Advanced Quantum ...
0
votes
1answer
48 views

Question about Majorana spinor's property

I am reading the BBS, Exercise 5.1 This exercise is nothing but showing that two Majorana spinors $\Theta_1$ and $\Theta_2$ \begin{align} \bar{\Theta}_1 \Gamma_{\mu} \Theta_2 = -\bar{\Theta}_2 ...
5
votes
0answers
122 views

Lorentz transformation of Gamma matrices $\gamma^{\mu}$

From my understanding, gamma matrices transforms under Lorentz transformation $\Lambda$ as \begin{equation} \gamma^{\mu} \rightarrow S[\Lambda]\gamma^{\mu}S[\Lambda]^{-1} = ...
2
votes
2answers
392 views

Generalization of De Rham cohomology for spinor fields

I am interested in possible generalizations of The De Rham cohomology for spinor fields. I am also interested in applications to physics such as in the construction of topological charges I can see ...
6
votes
1answer
172 views

Invariance of supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory under supersymmetry

I was following Brink, Scherk and Schwartz, "Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories". The variation of the Lagrangian w.r.t a supersymmetry transformation can be reduced to $$ \delta L = -igf_{a b c} ...
1
vote
1answer
71 views

Do particles have spin because there exist spinor representations for the Lorentz group?

I am reading Peskin and Schroeder's An introduction to field theory. They first describe the spinor representation of the Lorentz group, and then they mention the fact that different particles have ...
5
votes
1answer
113 views

Counting degrees of freedom in spinor-helicity formalism

Just a couple of quick questions about the spinor-helicity formalism. We start with $p^\mu$ and $\epsilon^\mu$, so we have eight degrees of freedom. Then we have that $p^\mu p_\mu = 0$ and that ...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

Why must the supersymmetry generators be spinors?

I have read in a few places (for example, at page 5 here) that the supersymmetry generators must be spinors. Quoting the reference mentioned The generator of the symmetry must relate two types of ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

Some questions about Weyl spinor algebra

I am following a review on supersymmetry and I am having trouble with Weyl spinor algebra. These are equations (4.2.1) ...
2
votes
1answer
82 views

Why does the Dirac equation reduce the fermionic degree of freedom by half

We know that in 4D a Dirac spinor has 4 complex components or 8 real components meaning 8 real off shell degrees of freedom (please correct me if I say something wrong here). When we go on-shell i.e ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

How can I prove that $\gamma^0$ is the parity operator for Dirac fields? [closed]

How can I prove that the parity operator on a Dirac field is $\gamma^0$? I was trying to prove it through Lorentz transformations but failed shortly.
2
votes
1answer
89 views

Spinors and Möbius strips

I asked this question on Math.SE as I thought the perspective of representation theory might be enlightening. But since the question was provoked by a description of Spinors describing the spin of ...
0
votes
1answer
88 views

Spinor notation in general relativity

I have a somewhat broad/big question, and I know that there are many references for it available out there. However, so far I couldn't find anything that I can really understand, that's why here is my ...
1
vote
0answers
72 views

Spinor helicity formalism, exact form of the spinors

I am trying to understand how to perform computations with the spinor helicity formalism, I am studying on this review http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1697. I have stumbled upon a problem though, in pag. ...
2
votes
3answers
75 views

How do I operate on a spin state with a sigma operator?

For any arbitrary spin state $|s\rangle$. How do I operate on it with the Pauli spin matrix, $\hat{\sigma_z}$? Does this have something to do with a Bloch sphere?
3
votes
1answer
144 views

Evolution of Eigenstates when two spin systems are coupled

I would like to describe the following situation: We have two spin systems: Spin 1 ($S_1$) and Spin 1/2 ($S_2$). Now imagine you somehow change their interaction so that you can fine-tune the ...
1
vote
1answer
57 views

Two-component formalism and four-component formalism [closed]

When deriving the Dirac equation for spin-1/2 particles, we realize that the wave function must be four-component. In some works, people use two-component wave function for calculation. So, my ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

dagger operator in spinor representation

I just have trouble understanding how hermitian conjugation is acting like this in the following example (dot represents right-handed Weyl field, undot represents left-handed Weyl field). For ...
0
votes
1answer
60 views

Hermitian Adjoint of Spinor

Say we have a four component spinor $\psi$: $$ \psi=\begin{pmatrix}\psi_L\\\psi_R\end{pmatrix} $$ Is the Hermitian adjoint of this: $$ \psi^\dagger =\begin{pmatrix}\psi_L^\dagger ...
1
vote
1answer
68 views

How to derive the form of the invariant spinor inner product?

So we have gamma matrices that satisfy the spacetime algebra relations, $\{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2 \eta^{\mu\nu}$. We know that if we set $\sigma^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{4}[\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu]$ ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

Spinors and asymmetry of wave function

A spinor is a mathematical entity which changes sign if it is rotated by $2\pi$. Is this connected to the asymmetry of the spinor wave function?
3
votes
1answer
186 views

What is a spinor?

In a youtube video, sir Michael Atiyah mentioned that even after working during the most of his life on spinors, he doesn't know what a spinor is. Now surely that was part of his humorous introduction ...
0
votes
1answer
71 views

Connection between two Petrov classification schemes

For the Weyl scalars of all spacetimes, at any point, possess one special structure, the so called principal null directions. Consider a general null tetrad $\{ l_a,n_a,m_a,\overline{m}_a \}$, we ...
1
vote
1answer
364 views

How to find the time evolution for two-component spinor? [closed]

I would like to find the time evolution for the given Hamiltonian, the initial state of the system we choose two spinor wavefunction $\psi_{+}(t=0)$ and $\psi_{-}(t=0)$ as given below: The effective ...
2
votes
1answer
75 views

Expressing the Schrödinger equation in terms of spinors

I appreciate that the Dirac equation can be thought of in terms of spinors, as it directly implies the presence of spin, in addition to initiating the concept of treating fields as operators. From ...
3
votes
0answers
68 views

How one can write $\bar{\psi}$ in odd dimension?

I know that the Dirac equation in general dimensions has a form of $$ (i\gamma_{\mu} \nabla_\mu - m ) \psi =0 $$ and the action for that is written as $$ S = \int d^d x \bar{\psi} (i\gamma_{\mu} ...
1
vote
1answer
51 views

Why does dimensional reduction of 10,6,2 to 9,5,1 have an equal number of supersymmetry?

In general, the number of supersymmetry is different for each dimension since from dimensional reduction, the number of supersymmetry is usually increased. $i.e$ 4d N=1 $\rightarrow$ 3d N=2 ...
2
votes
0answers
33 views

Parker-Taylor formula in the $n=4$ simple case

I am trying to do ex. 2.23 of http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.1697v2.pdf. I have chosen as reference spinors $q_1,q_2 = p_3$ and $q_3,q_4 = p_1$. Therefore if I compute $A^4[1^- 2^- 3^+ 4^+]$ the ...
4
votes
0answers
56 views

How many Killing spinors exist on $S^5$?

So, I know that on $S^n$, a spinor of the form $$ \Sigma^\pm = \frac{1 \pm i\gamma^\alpha z_\alpha}{\sqrt{1+z^2}}\Sigma_0$$ where $\Sigma_0$ is a constant spinor, is a Killing spinor on $S^n$ ...
2
votes
1answer
48 views

Decomposition of the gravitino into helicity $\pm \frac{3}{2}$ and $\pm \frac{1}{2}$ components

I'm reading this book on string theory. When they decompose two dimensional gravitino (formula 7.16) $$ \chi_\alpha = \frac{1}{2}\rho^\beta \rho_\alpha \chi_\beta + \frac{1}{2}\rho_\alpha \rho^\gamma ...
0
votes
0answers
32 views

What are the conditions of wave function continuity when solving for Dirac Spinors as done in “Klein paradox” paper by Novoselov?

In the paper "Chiral tunneling and Klein paradox" paper by Katsnelson, Novoselov, and Geim, they use the wave function for Dirac spinors. What are the conditions for continuity of the wave function ...
1
vote
1answer
84 views

Is my Summary of a Spinor Bundle Associated with a String Worldsheet Correct?

I've been having difficulty finding a source that lists all the properties of the spinor bundle of a string worldsheet explicitly, so I've had a go at creating my own description. I'd really ...
0
votes
0answers
34 views

Euclidean Continuation of spinor

I would like a clear and useful answer or explanation about these following argument or question that I'll place in logical order for my purpose that deal the Euclidean continuation of spinors in 5 ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

How can a spinor represent an “epistemic” state?

I have read a lot of stuff on the seemingly endless debate on ontology/epistemology of the quantum state $\psi$. But I always wonder: how can a spinor be considered epistemic when $\psi$ really ...
0
votes
0answers
35 views

Explanation for orientation entanglement

I have to write a summary for "orientation-entanglement": the state of an object/subsystem depends in general not only (locally) on its configuration in space, but also (nonlocally) on its topological ...
0
votes
0answers
61 views

The Covariant Spinor Derivative in the Locally Supersymmetric Generalisation of the Polyakov Action and Potential Mistakes in the Literature

Questions) I recently came upon the thesis The Landscape of Free Fermionic Gauge Models by D. G. Moore and G.B. Cleaver. On pages 20 and 21 they explain that the locally supersymmetric action, ...
1
vote
1answer
101 views

What is the role of the spacetime algebra?

For Minkowski space $M^4=\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$ the Clifford algebra $Cl_{1,3}$ (Dirac algebra) with $\{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu \}=2 g^{\mu \nu}$ is sometimes called "spacetime algebra". What is its ...
3
votes
2answers
306 views

An identity of Pauli matrices

I am studying spin recently, and textbook gives some identities of Pauli matrices, one said that for any two unit vectors $\bf m$ and $\bf n$, $[\bf m \cdot \bf{\sigma},\bf {n \cdot \sigma}]= ...
0
votes
0answers
37 views

representation of spinors

I am trying to get from the abstract representation of Spinors, as wave functions $|\Psi \rangle$ in the base of tensors products $| S_z \rangle \otimes | x \rangle$ of eigenvectors of the spin ...
6
votes
2answers
217 views

Is a spinor in some sense connected to space?

Spinors transform under the representation of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ which is the double cover of the Lorentz group $SO(1,3)$ - or in the non-relativistic case under $SU(2)$, the double cover of $SO(3)$. ...
3
votes
1answer
86 views

what does Peskin's square root of a matric mean?

Peskin (Intro to QFT) is using the next symbols when discussing dirac fields - $\sqrt{p\sigma}$ with $\sigma = (1,\sigma^1,\sigma^2,\sigma^3)$ (unit & Pauli). For example he represents the dirac ...
1
vote
0answers
20 views

Proof of Pauli-Kofink relation

In an article "Effect of the self-induced torsion of the Dirac sources on gravitational singularities" written by Akira Inomata he proves the Pauli-Fierz relation: $$ \bar{\psi}P\gamma_{\mu}\psi ...
3
votes
2answers
184 views

Why is the $(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})$ representation of the Lorentz group realized as the vector space of complex $2\times 2$ matrices?

Why can we write an arbitrary object $v_{a \dot{b} }$ our transformations in this basis act on as $$ v_{a \dot{b} } = v_{\nu} \sigma^{ \nu}_{a \dot{b} } = v^0 \begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\ 0&1 ...
9
votes
2answers
214 views

If $v_{a \dot{b}}$ transforms like a four-vector, what does $v_{a}^{\dot{b}}$ describe?

The $( \frac{1}{2}, 0)$ representation of the Lorentz group acts on left-chiral spinors $\chi_a$, the $( 0,\frac{1}{2} )$ representation on right-chiral spinors $\chi^{\dot a}$. The $( \frac{1}{2}, ...
3
votes
1answer
73 views

Variation of the kinetic quark term of the QCD Lagrangian under gauge transformation

A simple kinetic quark term would look like $$\bar{\psi}(\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} - m){\psi}.$$ Imposing SU(3) symmetry the Dirac spinor transforms like $$\psi(x) \rightarrow \psi'(x) = e^{ig_s ...
1
vote
2answers
66 views

Transformation of spinors due to Lorentz group

Assume we have a Dirac spinor $\psi(x)$ which satisfies the Dirac equation: $$(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} - m)\psi(x) = 0.$$ If we boost our spacetime coordinates to a new system with a Lorentz ...