The tag has no wiki summary.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
0answers
15 views

States in valence and conduction band

I often see a Hamiltonian in second quantization written for the valence and conduction band. Now, I was wondering: What are the single-electron states that form the prouct state they act on? So what ...
0
votes
2answers
57 views

Creation and annihilation operators in Hamiltonian

If I find a Hamiltonian $H = \sum_{k} \varepsilon_k a_k^{\dagger} a_k + \sum_k V_k a_k^{\dagger} a_k$ then I was wondering: As far as I know this is many body theory and so these operators act on ...
3
votes
0answers
275 views
+250

Horrifying electron gas model

I am given the Hamiltonian, in an exercise called plasmons, and where $\langle, \rangle $ denotes the expectation value. $$ H = \sum_{k} \varepsilon_k a_k^{\dagger} a_k + \sum_{k_1,k_2,q} V_q ...
3
votes
2answers
90 views

What is the physical interpretation of a field operator

So far in our lecture we defined creation operators $a^{\dagger}_{n}$ in the following way, that we said: Somebody got you a antisymmetric or symmetric N- particle state and now $a^{\dagger}_{n}$ ...
1
vote
1answer
43 views

Describing a single photon with creation and annihilation operators

Since I am not fully aware of the creation and annihilation operator formalism for single photons, I want to ask, if the following is correct: I am considering a photon in the vacuum which travel ...
1
vote
1answer
66 views

Creation and annihilation operators

In our lecture today, we introduced two kinds of creation and annihilation operators. I want to restrict myself to the antisymmetric case: The first operator $a_k^{\dagger}$ creates a state ...
0
votes
2answers
65 views

Second quantization, creation and annihilation operators

I found two notions of states for second quantization. One representation uses occupation numbers here, for example Another one creates the n+1 th particle in a collection of n existent states. see ...
2
votes
0answers
45 views

Time reversal operator in tight-binding model with second quantization form

In tight binding model, $H=\sum_{r,r'}ta^{\dagger}_{r}a_{r'}+h.c.$.When now conducting a time reversal transformation, what form will this Hamiltonian like? Or how can I express time reversal ...
3
votes
1answer
64 views

Bosonic Schrödinger field [closed]

When second quantizating the Schrödinger field $$\psi(r,t) = \sum_i \phi_i(r)b_i(t),\quad\mbox{and}\quad \psi^{\dagger}(r,t) = \sum_i \phi_{i}(r)^* b_i^{\dagger}(t),$$ we have the commutation ...
2
votes
1answer
93 views

Normal Ordering the $\phi^4$ interaction

I am trying to quantize the quartic potential $\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^{4}$ in a box of side length $L$, with periodic boundary conditions. I have expanded the field ...
1
vote
0answers
45 views

Why is this equation regarding boson coherent states true?

I'm reading the proof of the closure for boson coherent states and it involves the following step: $$ \int \prod_{\beta}\frac{\mathrm d \phi^*_{\beta} \mathrm d \phi_{\beta}}{2 \pi i} e^{-\sum_\beta ...
1
vote
1answer
79 views

How does vacuum state look in first quantization?

Wikipedia says that the vacuum state is the unit of tensor product. In my understanding then, a first-quantized wavefunction for the vacuum state would be just constant in the each particle's ...
0
votes
1answer
47 views

A problem about solving energy bands by the method of second quantization

In hopping model, we can get the Hamitonian as $H_0=-t\sum a^\dagger_ia_{i'}$. Then we take the fourier transform and put the operator which are in momentum space in the Hamitonian above. However, I ...
1
vote
1answer
83 views

Annihilation Operator on the Fock space

I agree that $$\hat a|0\rangle=0$$ But then, based on the above, the following should hold $$\hat a_k |N_1,...,N_{k-1},0,N_{k+1},...\rangle=|N_1\rangle\oplus\cdots\oplus |N_{k-1}\rangle\oplus \hat ...
1
vote
1answer
70 views

What is the general theory that describes the interactions between strings?

What is the general theory that describes the interactions between strings? I mean the basic object in the theory is (closed) string and they have interactions among them. The string theory, as I ...
3
votes
2answers
124 views

Why do we need 2. Quantization of the Dirac Equation

As a Mathematician reading about the Dirac equation on the internet, leaves me with a great deal of confusion, about it. So let me start with its definition: The Dirac equation, is given by $ i ...
1
vote
1answer
71 views

Hermiticity of the quantum field

The quantum field resultant from the quantization of a real classical field is hermitian, but why the quantum field corresponding to a complex classical field should be non-hermitian?
3
votes
1answer
94 views

Are constant terms in second-quantization relevant?

I have a rather broad question and a specific problem. Let's take a orthonormal single-particle basis $\{ \vert i \rangle \}$, a simple single-particle Hamiltonian $$\tilde{H} = \sum_{i, j} h_{i j} ...
1
vote
0answers
71 views

Normal ordering

If I understood correctly there are two terms called normal ordering: $:c c^\dagger: = c^\dagger c \hspace{.5cm}$so shifting all creation operators to the left and all annihilation operators to the ...
10
votes
3answers
271 views

In what sense is a quantum field an infinite set of harmonic oscillators?

In what sense is a quantum field an infinite set of harmonic oscillators, one at each space-time point? When is it useful to think of a quantum field this way? The book I'm reading now, QFT by ...
1
vote
2answers
66 views

Tricks at manipulating creation/annihilation operators

Manipulation of terms in algebras different from the standard one (e.g. boolean algebra) can be a bit unnatural but there are always shortcuts that can help you. I was wondering if there is a list ...
2
votes
1answer
109 views

Schrödinger evolution for a Klein-Gordon equation

I have a problem with the transition from quantum relativistic wave equations (specifically Klein-Gordon equation) to QFT, since a lot of assumptions seem implicit. For example I have a problem with ...
2
votes
1answer
163 views

Solving the BCS Hamiltonian via the Bogoliubov Transformation

I was doing a calculation in Giamarchi's Introduction to Many Body Physics, chapter 3, on BCS theory and second quantization, and ran into some confusion with the BCS Hamiltonian. The pdf is here for ...
11
votes
2answers
375 views

Correct way to write the eigenvector of a diagonalized hamiltonian in second quantization

I am studying diagonalization of a quadratic bosonic Hamiltonian of the type: $$ H = \displaystyle\sum_{<i,j>} A_{ij} a_i^\dagger a_j + \frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\sum_{<i,j>} [B_{ij} ...
2
votes
0answers
45 views

How to formulate collapse in polarization subspace of a photon?

I am wondering how to describe the collapse of a photon state when it is measured in the polarization degree of freedom (say by a filter which let pass just one particular polarisation). Let the free ...
2
votes
4answers
280 views

Bogoliubov transformation with a slight twist

Given a Hamiltonian of the form $H=\sum_k \begin{pmatrix}a_k^\dagger & b_k^\dagger \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}\omega_0 & \Omega f_k \\ \Omega f_k^* & \omega_0\end{pmatrix} ...
4
votes
0answers
217 views

Is non-relativistic quantum field theory equivalent with quantum mechanics?

Related post Can we "trivialize" the equivalence between canonical quantization of fields and second quantization of particles? Some books of many-body physics, e.g. A.L.Fetter and ...
1
vote
1answer
77 views

Deriving commutation relations in second quantisation

I am trying to start from: \begin{align*} [\phi(x),\pi(x')] = i\hbar\delta(x-x') \\ [\phi(x),\phi(x')] = [\pi(x),\pi(x')]=0 \end{align*} to derive: \begin{align*} [a(k),a(k')^\dagger]=\delta_{kk'}\\ ...
2
votes
3answers
293 views

Dirac equation in QFT vs relativistic QM

How does the Dirac equation in quantum field theory solve the existing problems in the interpretation Dirac equation (as a single-particle wave equation) in relativistic quantum mechanics? EDIT: The ...
1
vote
0answers
107 views

Second quantization Hamiltonian Matrix for an aggregate

I am working on the matrix form of the Hamiltonian in the second quantization. I haven't taken any course on second quantization and I'm learning it on my own. I'm a little bit confused about the ...
-1
votes
1answer
83 views

Bath Hamiltonian in second quantization

I'm trying to write down the bath Hamiltonian for a system of dimers and trimers. Imagine each of the monomers in the excited state can interact with several phonons with given frequencies. The bath ...
0
votes
1answer
215 views

Second quantization of Klein Gordon field

Does the second quantization of the Klein Gordon field which involves using the harmonic oscillator paradigm ultimately lead to the conclusion that electromagnetic field is nothing but photons(bosons) ...
4
votes
1answer
178 views

Entanglement entropy of 1D chiral Fermion

I was told that the entanglement entropy $S_E$ on the ground state of a (1+1)D conformal field theory (CFT) follows the logarithmic behavior $S_E=\frac{c}{12}\ln L$ where $L$ is the length scale ...
3
votes
3answers
217 views

Schroedinger field operators and their commutation relations

I've got several questions regarding the so called second quantization of the Schroedinger equation. My professor introduced the field operators for the Schroedinger field by simply stating them as ...
3
votes
1answer
161 views

A naive question about the Second Quantization?

Let's consider a single-particle(boson or fermion) with $n$ states $\phi_1,\cdots,\phi_n$(normalized orthogonal basis of the single-particle Hilbert space), and let $h$ be the single-particle ...
2
votes
0answers
128 views

Trace of the number operator in second quantization

I would like to find the helmholtz free energy of a system $F=-T ln(Tr[e^{\frac{-H}{T}}])$ namely a bcs superconductor (using Annett's notation) $H=\sum E_k (b_{k\uparrow}^\dagger ...
13
votes
5answers
513 views

Can we “trivialize” the equivalence between canonical quantization of fields and second quantization of particles?

As Weinberg exposited in his QFT Vol1, there are two equivalent ways of arriving at the same quantum field theories: (1). Start with single-particle representations of Poincare group, and then make a ...
2
votes
1answer
79 views

Fock state and corresponding relations for continuous momentum label

In Wikipedia I found following relation for Fock state: $$ \hat {a}_i| \{n_j\}_j\rangle ~=~ \sqrt{n}_i| \{n_j-\delta_{ij}\}_j\rangle, $$ where $n_j$ refers to the number of $j$'th particles. This ...
1
vote
1answer
84 views

Matrix elements of a one-fermion operator (first and second quantizations)

I'm currently struggling with the expression of operators in second quantization. I did an exercise in which I had to consider a fermion in a central potential $V(\vec{r})$ and show that the matrix ...
1
vote
1answer
157 views

How to understand the entanglement in a lattice fermion system?

Topological insulator is a fermion system with only short-ranged entanglement, what does the entanglement mean here? For example, the Hilbert space $V_s$ of a lattice $N$ spin-1/2 system is ...
3
votes
0answers
151 views

Fock Subspaces and Weight Vectors

This is my first time taking a physics course (I'm a mathematics major), so I'm encountering a lot of new things, which I'm kind of expected to know. In particular, how to work with Bosons. I've got ...
2
votes
2answers
150 views

Scalar QFT Fock Space

I want to demostrate the following relation of the normal ordered product: $\Omega\equiv:\exp{\left(-\int d^3k~a^{\dagger}(k)a(k)\right)}:=|0\rangle\langle0|.$ I proved the commutation relation ...
2
votes
1answer
85 views

A change of sign in the electron-hole second quantization form

It is common to see people do a change of sign in the so called electron-hole representation, namely, $$ b^{\dagger}_{-k}=a_{v,k} $$ similar argument also seen in 1992 mattuck's book "guide to ...
0
votes
2answers
411 views

Occupation Number Representation in Second Quantization Formalism — What do the entries mean?

I'm reading about the second quantization formalism. I can see the advantages of using number states to represent multiparticle states. Here's my question: Let's say we're given a single-particle ...
2
votes
0answers
62 views

generation / destruction of fermions by phonons

my Hamiltonian consists of 1D free fermions coupled to a bosonic bath. The interaction is dictated both by scattering terms $H^{scatt}=\sum_{kq}\alpha^S_{kq}c^\dagger_kc_{k+q}X_q+h.c.$ as well as ...
2
votes
0answers
95 views

Second quantization with qubits

Is "second quantization" means system wich can contain variable, unknown, superposed and otherwise uncertain number of qubits? Can "second quantized" system contain 0.5% of 1 qubit and 95% of 2 ...
4
votes
2answers
312 views

Second Quantization - Texts

I am trying to familiarize myself with the ideas of Second Quantization. However, the literature that I can find online seems only to outline the tools of this formalism of quantum mechanics. There ...
2
votes
1answer
172 views

Reason behind canonical quantization in QFT?

Reason behind canonical quantization in QFT? In the scalar field theory we simply promote the scalar field, $\phi(x)$ to a set of operators: $\hat{\phi}(x)$. What is the reason behind this?
3
votes
2answers
286 views

Composition of squeeze operators?

I'm wondering if it exists a composition law for the squeezing operation ? I guess so for geometric reason, since they are (generalized, and the phase is annoying of course) hyperbolic rotations of ...
2
votes
1answer
115 views

One body harmonic oscillator states expressed in terms of creation operators

I am reading trough chapter one of Moshinsky's "The harmonic Oscillator in Modern Physics". However i am having some trouble with the mathematics in section 8 of chapter 1. I will sketch a summary of ...