The tag has no usage guidance.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
0answers
63 views

Connection between Veneziano amplitude and Regge amplitude

I have tried to read about Regge theory, and I continue to run my head against the Veneziano formula, which is said to produce correct Regge trajectories by eg. t'Hooft at page 6 here: http://www....
3
votes
1answer
41 views

Distributive property of the time-ordering symbol

Most derivations of the LSZ reduction formula, e.g. Srednicki (equations 5.13, 5.14, 5.15), Schwartz (equations 6.17, 6.18, 6.19), Wikipedia use a property of the time-ordering symbol that looks like ...
2
votes
0answers
39 views

What are the differences (if any) between the Dyson's series definition and the “in/out” definition of the $S$-matrix

So long, in my QFT courses, I've seen two definitions of the $S$-matrix: The first, more elementary, definition is given in the interaction picture: $$S=\text T \lbrace \exp [-i\intop \text d ^4 x \,...
2
votes
1answer
73 views

R-matrix and S-matrix in QFT

In the study of quantum field theory, one may encounter S-matrix a lot. Recently, in the study of integrability, I encountered R-matrix formulation which I am not familiar with. First of all, the S-...
106
votes
2answers
12k views

Why do we not have spin greater than 2?

It is commonly asserted that no consistent, interacting quantum field theory can be constructed with fields that have spin greater than 2 (possibly with some allusion to renormalization). I've also ...
3
votes
1answer
156 views

S-matrix in Weinberg QFT

I'm a bit confused by Weinberg's discussion of scattering. He defined the in and out states $|\Psi^{\pm}_\alpha\rangle$ with particle content $\alpha$ as states that transform under the Poincare group ...
0
votes
1answer
66 views

Definition of the S-matrix

when I think about scattering process I reach to slightly another definition to the S-matrix. because I understand my reasoning I hope someone could refine it to a correct one so that I can have a ...
0
votes
1answer
45 views

Information that can be extracted from the time-ordered correlation function

The time-ordered correlation function can be very complicated and encodes a tremendous amount of information. For example, the LSZ formula can be used to extract S-matrix elements from the time-...
3
votes
2answers
53 views

Momentum conserving delta-function in the transfer matrix of quantum-field-theoretic scattering theory

The $S$-matrix vanishes unless the initial and final states have the same total $4$-momentum, so it is helpful to factor an overall momentum-conserving $\delta$-function: $$\mathcal{T}=(2\pi)^{4}\...
0
votes
0answers
36 views

Wick contraction in proton-pion production

Proton-pion production $\gamma + p \rightarrow \pi^0 + p$ occurs through the interaction hamiltonian $$\mathcal H_{int} = ig \bar \psi^{(p)} \gamma_5 \psi^{(p)} \phi + e \bar \psi^{(p)} \gamma_{\mu} \...
7
votes
0answers
55 views

Why would renormalization be necessary without divergent integrals? [duplicate]

Weinberg uses the LSZ reduction formula to introduce field renormalization,and on page 441, he says: As this discussion should make clear: the renormalization of masses and fields has nothing to ...
2
votes
1answer
111 views

S-matrix element

I'm confused with the relation between the fully resummed propagator in a given QFT and the corresponding S-matrix element. According to the LSZ reduction formula ($\phi^4$ theory for definiteness ...
5
votes
0answers
137 views

Relation between Borchers class and the LSZ formula on S-matrix equivalence

It seems well known that different quantum fields can give rise to the same $S$-matrix. I know of two ways this is described. The first is through the Borchers class of relatively local fields, i.e. ...
-1
votes
1answer
80 views

Re: The $T$-matrix, Feynman amplitudes, and getting the scattering corrections from the interaction Hamiltonian

I'm running in circles about something in Scattering Theory at the moment. Let me summarize. In quantum theories we are interested in finding experimentally measurable quantities such as scattering ...
9
votes
3answers
307 views

Are there any serious alternatives to QCD nowadays?

I've read several posts here where people talk about the history of the developement of the theory of strong interactions. And they mention Regge theory, pomerons, S-matrix and so on. I'm confused ...
5
votes
2answers
3k views

Why are scattering matrices unitary?

In Griffith's QM book, he introduces scattering matrices as an end-of-the-chapter Problem 2.52. For a Dirac-Delta potential $V(x) = \alpha \delta (x - x_0)$, I've derived the scattering matrix and ...
5
votes
1answer
111 views

Reality of the action in QFT [duplicate]

Following Ramond, 1.5 Field Theory, it is mentioned that the classical Lagrangian density in (workable for HEP) QFT theories has to be Real, otherwise total probability is not conserved. Can someone ...
8
votes
2answers
294 views

Why does the action have to be hermitian?

The hermiticity of operators of observables, e.g. the Hamiltonian, in QM is usually justified by saying that the eigenvalues must be real valued. I know that the Lagrangian is just a Legendre ...
2
votes
1answer
98 views

How do we calculate the S-matrix using non-perturbative QFT?

The cross section of a scattering process in $QFT$ is computed in terms of the S-matrix elements. In perturbative $QFT$, the same is done by computing the S-matrix elements by using Feynman ...
5
votes
2answers
452 views

Time-ordered operator in Srednicki

On page 51 Srednicki states, "Note that the operators are in time order...we can insert $T$ without changing anything". This I agree with. But then on the next paragraph he states "The time order ...
1
vote
1answer
115 views

Scattering Amplitude Not Invariant under Little Group?

I am trying to make sense of scattering amplitude recently. In some literature people say that if some number of massless particles collide together, one can theoretically express the scattering ...
3
votes
1answer
111 views

What is meant by open-string tachyon scattering amplitude?

It was said here that Veneziano derived: open-string tachyon scattering amplitude from principles of Regge theory and S-matrix theory and used the Euler beta-function to make all the critical ...
1
vote
0answers
111 views

Is the Amplituhedron somehow equivalent to the S-matrix theory?

Amplituhedra are a family of spaces with the property that co-dimension one boundary of an Amplituhedron are the product of "smaller" Amplituhedra. In addition they are given a volume form that has a ...
2
votes
0answers
51 views

S-matrix element for forward scattering and amputed green function

I'm studying dispersion relations applied as alternative method to perturbation theory from Weinberg's book (Vol.1) Let's consider the forward scattering in the lab frame of a massless boson of any ...
3
votes
2answers
235 views

What are anomalous threshold singularities

In the papers of the 1950s and 1960s, I see reference to anomalous threshold singularities. What are these? Is there a good reference that discusses this subject?
0
votes
0answers
39 views

Construct fields from from unitary representation of Poincaré group

I am trying to understand how construct fields from unitary representation of Poincaré group and the reasoning that Weinberg give in his book is the cluster decomposition principle and Lorentz ...
0
votes
2answers
70 views

How does one get the first few terms of the S-matrix expansion?

According to a set of notes I'm reading $$\langle p_f | S | p_i \rangle = \delta(p_f-p_i) + 2 \pi \delta(E_f-E_i) \bigg[\langle p_f | V | p_i \rangle + \cdots\bigg] \tag{1.29}$$ I don't understand ...
4
votes
0answers
102 views

Unitarity of the S-matrix and Feynman Diagrams

There are several questions on the unitarity of the S matrix, but unfortunately non of them answers directly the following question. The S matrix is unitary and that can be proven by the fact that ...
1
vote
1answer
55 views

General scattering theory

I have studied a bit of scattering/diffusion theory in an introductory course in quantum mechanics (the kind where the scattering potential is delta, box, and similar easy functions). But when the ...
3
votes
2answers
156 views

Gauge symmetry for p-forms

It is well known that the Lorentz invariance of the S-matrix implies gauge redundancy for 1-forms or 'photons'. Does this argument go through to $p$-forms? That is, does Lorentz invariance of the S-...
4
votes
0answers
189 views

Scattering, Perturbation and asymptotic states in LSZ reduction formula

I was following Schwarz's book on quantum field theory. There he defines the asymptotic momentum eigenstates $|i\rangle\equiv |k_1 k_2\rangle$ and $|f\rangle\equiv |k_3 k_4\rangle$ in the S-matrix ...
4
votes
1answer
301 views

Free Vacuum vs Interacting Vacuum and Wick's theorem

I'm studying perturbation theory in QFT and I stumbled on a conceptual problem. My understanding of the interplay between LSZ reduction formula and the Gell-Mann & Low perturbation series is that:...
1
vote
0answers
90 views

Peskin-Schroeder, Unitarity of the S matrix, eq 9.61

I have a question regarding a derivation in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book. On page 298, he is discussing a method for defining a gauge invariant S matrix. He does this by defining projection ...
1
vote
2answers
239 views

Quantum theory of light

What's the scattering matrix for a PBS (polarization beam splitter)? Is it just unitary? If one polarization never couples into another polarization (then there's a lot of zeroes in that 4x4 matrix) - ...
10
votes
1answer
649 views

Does de Sitter space admit an asymptotic S-matrix?

From the Penrose diagram of de Sitter space, we see it has a future and past conformal boundary, and they are both spacelike. So, does de Sitter space admit an asymptotic S-matrix? Sure, in the usual ...
3
votes
1answer
178 views

Regarding a small step in the derivation of the LSZ formula

I'd like to prove the LSZ formula, but there is a specific step that is bugging me a lot. I know there are many subtleties in its derivation, but I'm not worrying about this right now: I'm trying to ...
0
votes
1answer
90 views

What is the energy-conserving delta function

I am reading about the S-matrix in QFT (Standard Model book by Burgess and Moore) and I came across the energy-conserving delta function, which is factored out of the S-matrix. I would greatly ...
10
votes
1answer
303 views

Probability conservation in WKB tunneling

Suppose we have quantum mechanical plane waves of energy $E$ incident upon a one-dimensional potential barrier $V(x)$ with sloping sides. One can compare the WKB solutions in the three relevant ...
8
votes
2answers
338 views

How to replace $T$-product with retarded commutator in LSZ formula?

I am reading Itzykson and Zuber's Quantum Field Theory book, and am unable to understand a step that is made on page 246: Here, they consider the elastic scattering of particle $A$ off particle $B$: ...
2
votes
1answer
309 views

What's the difference between correlation functions and S-matrix, and between in-in formalism (or “closed time path formalism”) and in-out formalism?

I was reading the "in-in" formalism (or "closed time path formalism" used in condensed matter physics) in cosmology created by Schwinger in 1961, and there is a saying: "they care about correlation ...
3
votes
0answers
105 views

How exactly analyticity of S-matrix comes from causality principle?

Recently I've read that analyticity of S-matrix ($S(k)$, where $k$ corresponds to momentum, may be analytically extended into complex values of momentum) comes from causality principle. How to prove ...
6
votes
0answers
110 views

What is the physical interpretation of the automorphism on bounded operators induced by an S matrix?

In a QFT, the S-matrix $S$ is a unitary operator, that fixes the vacuum and commutes with the unitary operators implementing the action of the Poincare group on an appropriate Hilbert space $H$. ...
2
votes
0answers
178 views

Perturbation theory : quadratic external field

I'm trying to derive the explicit form of S-matrix of an interaction Hamiltonian $$H' = \frac{1}{2} \lambda \left[ \int d^3 x \rho({\vec x}) \phi({\vec x}, t)\right]^2\tag{1}$$ Even though the ...
5
votes
1answer
255 views

A question about the energy of turning on and off interaction adiabatically in QFT

I read a saying as follows: In a theory with no particles which decay and no bound states, the turning on and off of the interactions merely serves to limit the effective range of forces. In this ...
0
votes
0answers
51 views

What to do when finite counterterms are undetermined?

Suppose I have some theory of "new physics" which involves interaction of some gauge boson with Standard model. For this theory I have some loop-mediated process with this new gauge boson whose matrix ...
3
votes
0answers
135 views

Polology in Functional Integration

Completeness of Hilbert space (on-shell states) is a very powerful concept in canonical quantization, for example, to study the nonperturbative characteristics of the S-matrix, like polology (pole and ...
2
votes
1answer
314 views

Green's Functions from Gell-Mann and Low Theorem

What I want to do: $\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right\rangle}$ $\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left\langle#1\right|}$ $\newcommand{\braket}[1]{\left\langle#1\right\rangle}$ The Gell-Mann Low Theorem tells ...
1
vote
1answer
158 views

Relation between scattering matrix and an effective Hamiltonian

Could somebody provide the proof (or reference to some accessible literature) of relation $$S(E) = 1 + 2πiW^{†} (H_M − E − iπW W^{†} )^{−1} W \tag{2}$$ of arXiv:0806.4889, which relates $S$-matrix to ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

What does it mean to have a degenerate $S$-matrix?

The Coleman-Mandula theorem $D>2$ assumes that the quantum field theory may not have a degenerate $S$-matrix. But what does it mean to have a degenerate $S$-matrix? The $S$-matrix if I got it ...
2
votes
1answer
162 views

Why are Green Functions/(Correlation Functions) not on the mass shell?

The difference between Green Functions and the S-matrix in Quantum Field Theory is whether the momentum is on the mass shell. Why are the Green Functions/(Correlation Functions) not on the mass shell? ...