The tag has no usage guidance.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
1answer
64 views

Definition of the S-matrix

when I think about scattering process I reach to slightly another definition to the S-matrix. because I understand my reasoning I hope someone could refine it to a correct one so that I can have a ...
0
votes
1answer
45 views

Information that can be extracted from the time-ordered correlation function

The time-ordered correlation function can be very complicated and encodes a tremendous amount of information. For example, the LSZ formula can be used to extract S-matrix elements from the time-...
3
votes
2answers
45 views

Momentum conserving delta-function in the transfer matrix of quantum-field-theoretic scattering theory

The $S$-matrix vanishes unless the initial and final states have the same total $4$-momentum, so it is helpful to factor an overall momentum-conserving $\delta$-function: $$\mathcal{T}=(2\pi)^{4}\...
0
votes
0answers
35 views

Wick contraction in proton-pion production

Proton-pion production $\gamma + p \rightarrow \pi^0 + p$ occurs through the interaction hamiltonian $$\mathcal H_{int} = ig \bar \psi^{(p)} \gamma_5 \psi^{(p)} \phi + e \bar \psi^{(p)} \gamma_{\mu} \...
7
votes
0answers
55 views

Why would renormalization be necessary without divergent integrals? [duplicate]

Weinberg uses the LSZ reduction formula to introduce field renormalization,and on page 441, he says: As this discussion should make clear: the renormalization of masses and fields has nothing to ...
5
votes
0answers
135 views

Relation between Borchers class and the LSZ formula on S-matrix equivalence

It seems well known that different quantum fields can give rise to the same $S$-matrix. I know of two ways this is described. The first is through the Borchers class of relatively local fields, i.e. ...
2
votes
1answer
104 views

S-matrix element

I'm confused with the relation between the fully resummed propagator in a given QFT and the corresponding S-matrix element. According to the LSZ reduction formula ($\phi^4$ theory for definiteness ...
-1
votes
1answer
78 views

Re: The $T$-matrix, Feynman amplitudes, and getting the scattering corrections from the interaction Hamiltonian

I'm running in circles about something in Scattering Theory at the moment. Let me summarize. In quantum theories we are interested in finding experimentally measurable quantities such as scattering ...
2
votes
1answer
93 views

How do we calculate the S-matrix using non-perturbative QFT?

The cross section of a scattering process in $QFT$ is computed in terms of the S-matrix elements. In perturbative $QFT$, the same is done by computing the S-matrix elements by using Feynman ...
1
vote
0answers
109 views

Is the Amplituhedron somehow equivalent to the S-matrix theory?

Amplituhedra are a family of spaces with the property that co-dimension one boundary of an Amplituhedron are the product of "smaller" Amplituhedra. In addition they are given a volume form that has a ...
3
votes
1answer
107 views

What is meant by open-string tachyon scattering amplitude?

It was said here that Veneziano derived: open-string tachyon scattering amplitude from principles of Regge theory and S-matrix theory and used the Euler beta-function to make all the critical ...
2
votes
0answers
49 views

S-matrix element for forward scattering and amputed green function

I'm studying dispersion relations applied as alternative method to perturbation theory from Weinberg's book (Vol.1) Let's consider the forward scattering in the lab frame of a massless boson of any ...
0
votes
0answers
39 views

Construct fields from from unitary representation of Poincaré group

I am trying to understand how construct fields from unitary representation of Poincaré group and the reasoning that Weinberg give in his book is the cluster decomposition principle and Lorentz ...
0
votes
2answers
70 views

How does one get the first few terms of the S-matrix expansion?

According to a set of notes I'm reading $$\langle p_f | S | p_i \rangle = \delta(p_f-p_i) + 2 \pi \delta(E_f-E_i) \bigg[\langle p_f | V | p_i \rangle + \cdots\bigg] \tag{1.29}$$ I don't understand ...
4
votes
0answers
100 views

Unitarity of the S-matrix and Feynman Diagrams

There are several questions on the unitarity of the S matrix, but unfortunately non of them answers directly the following question. The S matrix is unitary and that can be proven by the fact that ...
1
vote
1answer
55 views

General scattering theory

I have studied a bit of scattering/diffusion theory in an introductory course in quantum mechanics (the kind where the scattering potential is delta, box, and similar easy functions). But when the ...
4
votes
0answers
180 views

Scattering, Perturbation and asymptotic states in LSZ reduction formula

I was following Schwarz's book on quantum field theory. There he defines the asymptotic momentum eigenstates $|i\rangle\equiv |k_1 k_2\rangle$ and $|f\rangle\equiv |k_3 k_4\rangle$ in the S-matrix ...
4
votes
1answer
279 views

Free Vacuum vs Interacting Vacuum and Wick's theorem

I'm studying perturbation theory in QFT and I stumbled on a conceptual problem. My understanding of the interplay between LSZ reduction formula and the Gell-Mann & Low perturbation series is that:...
3
votes
1answer
152 views

S-matrix in Weinberg QFT

I'm a bit confused by Weinberg's discussion of scattering. He defined the in and out states $|\Psi^{\pm}_\alpha\rangle$ with particle content $\alpha$ as states that transform under the Poincare group ...
1
vote
0answers
86 views

Peskin-Schroeder, Unitarity of the S matrix, eq 9.61

I have a question regarding a derivation in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book. On page 298, he is discussing a method for defining a gauge invariant S matrix. He does this by defining projection ...
3
votes
1answer
170 views

Regarding a small step in the derivation of the LSZ formula

I'd like to prove the LSZ formula, but there is a specific step that is bugging me a lot. I know there are many subtleties in its derivation, but I'm not worrying about this right now: I'm trying to ...
0
votes
1answer
86 views

What is the energy-conserving delta function

I am reading about the S-matrix in QFT (Standard Model book by Burgess and Moore) and I came across the energy-conserving delta function, which is factored out of the S-matrix. I would greatly ...
10
votes
1answer
300 views

Probability conservation in WKB tunneling

Suppose we have quantum mechanical plane waves of energy $E$ incident upon a one-dimensional potential barrier $V(x)$ with sloping sides. One can compare the WKB solutions in the three relevant ...
3
votes
0answers
102 views

How exactly analyticity of S-matrix comes from causality principle?

Recently I've read that analyticity of S-matrix ($S(k)$, where $k$ corresponds to momentum, may be analytically extended into complex values of momentum) comes from causality principle. How to prove ...
1
vote
1answer
114 views

Scattering Amplitude Not Invariant under Little Group?

I am trying to make sense of scattering amplitude recently. In some literature people say that if some number of massless particles collide together, one can theoretically express the scattering ...
6
votes
0answers
109 views

What is the physical interpretation of the automorphism on bounded operators induced by an S matrix?

In a QFT, the S-matrix $S$ is a unitary operator, that fixes the vacuum and commutes with the unitary operators implementing the action of the Poincare group on an appropriate Hilbert space $H$. ...
2
votes
0answers
176 views

Perturbation theory : quadratic external field

I'm trying to derive the explicit form of S-matrix of an interaction Hamiltonian $$H' = \frac{1}{2} \lambda \left[ \int d^3 x \rho({\vec x}) \phi({\vec x}, t)\right]^2\tag{1}$$ Even though the ...
0
votes
0answers
51 views

What to do when finite counterterms are undetermined?

Suppose I have some theory of "new physics" which involves interaction of some gauge boson with Standard model. For this theory I have some loop-mediated process with this new gauge boson whose matrix ...
3
votes
0answers
126 views

Polology in Functional Integration

Completeness of Hilbert space (on-shell states) is a very powerful concept in canonical quantization, for example, to study the nonperturbative characteristics of the S-matrix, like polology (pole and ...
2
votes
1answer
298 views

Green's Functions from Gell-Mann and Low Theorem

What I want to do: $\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right\rangle}$ $\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left\langle#1\right|}$ $\newcommand{\braket}[1]{\left\langle#1\right\rangle}$ The Gell-Mann Low Theorem tells ...
1
vote
1answer
153 views

Relation between scattering matrix and an effective Hamiltonian

Could somebody provide the proof (or reference to some accessible literature) of relation $$S(E) = 1 + 2πiW^{†} (H_M − E − iπW W^{†} )^{−1} W \tag{2}$$ of arXiv:0806.4889, which relates $S$-matrix to ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

What does it mean to have a degenerate $S$-matrix?

The Coleman-Mandula theorem $D>2$ assumes that the quantum field theory may not have a degenerate $S$-matrix. But what does it mean to have a degenerate $S$-matrix? The $S$-matrix if I got it ...
2
votes
1answer
178 views

Scattering Matrix of a Given Circuit - Microwave

This might be an easy question but I couldn't find it in our course book[Microwave Engineering, Pozar, 4th ed] or on internet. I have a homework and one of the questions asks me to find the S-Matrix ...
2
votes
1answer
159 views

Why are Green Functions/(Correlation Functions) not on the mass shell?

The difference between Green Functions and the S-matrix in Quantum Field Theory is whether the momentum is on the mass shell. Why are the Green Functions/(Correlation Functions) not on the mass shell? ...
5
votes
1answer
110 views

Reality of the action in QFT [duplicate]

Following Ramond, 1.5 Field Theory, it is mentioned that the classical Lagrangian density in (workable for HEP) QFT theories has to be Real, otherwise total probability is not conserved. Can someone ...
2
votes
0answers
22 views

Main differences between elastodynamic and light scattering when using S-matrix to find bound states

What are the main differences (top 5 if question is too broad), for using the S-matrix to find bound states, between elastodynamic and light scattering? (if it facilitates a higher quality question/...
0
votes
1answer
43 views

scattering by weak potential and the adiabatic hypothesis

In Ryder QFT, regarding the calculation of the scattering amplitude by a weak potential $V$, the potential is assumed to be switched on and off slowly using the adiabatic hypothesis. But there is a ...
4
votes
1answer
197 views

Why does S-matrix unitarity imply the cross section $\sigma$ $\propto$ $\frac {1}{s}$?

I'm currently learning for an oral exam in theoretical physics and as a learning aid protocols of older exams exist. In one protocol the question was asked: Why is the scattering cross section $\...
1
vote
2answers
431 views

Scattering theory textbooks

I am looking for a possibly extensive list of great textbooks on elastic and inelastic scattering of particles within quantum field theory. So far I am familiar with: Peskin and Schroeder: An ...
1
vote
1answer
255 views

The n-point Green functions and Heisenberg picture

Let's have the S-matrix: $$ S_{\beta \alpha} = \langle \beta | \hat{S} | \alpha\rangle . $$ Here $|\alpha \rangle , | \beta \rangle$ are $t \to \mp \infty$ limit of the free states, $\hat {S} = \hat{T}...
2
votes
1answer
295 views

What's the difference between correlation functions and S-matrix, and between in-in formalism (or “closed time path formalism”) and in-out formalism?

I was reading the "in-in" formalism (or "closed time path formalism" used in condensed matter physics) in cosmology created by Schwinger in 1961, and there is a saying: "they care about correlation ...
6
votes
2answers
414 views

S-Matrix Elements in Path Integral Formalism

I have a question related to the connection between the S-Matrix elements and the path integral formalism. In order to formulate the question, I will just work with a scalar field theory for ...
8
votes
2answers
275 views

Why does the action have to be hermitian?

The hermiticity of operators of observables, e.g. the Hamiltonian, in QM is usually justified by saying that the eigenvalues must be real valued. I know that the Lagrangian is just a Legendre ...
2
votes
0answers
93 views

S-Matrix Generating Functional (Problem 4.1 in Weinberg)

I'm currently working through Weinberg's QFT book, but I'm somewhat stuck at problem 4.1, which states: Define generating functionals for the S-matrix and its connected part: \begin{equation} F[\...
1
vote
0answers
123 views

Probability and the propagator

Due to the Wiki article, "...In quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to ...
8
votes
2answers
336 views

How to replace $T$-product with retarded commutator in LSZ formula?

I am reading Itzykson and Zuber's Quantum Field Theory book, and am unable to understand a step that is made on page 246: Here, they consider the elastic scattering of particle $A$ off particle $B$: ...
2
votes
0answers
61 views

One question about renormalization

The idea of renormalization of "naked" perturbation theory is in principal possibility of addition counterterms which reduce infinity when calculating matrix elements. But I have met such concepts as ...
1
vote
1answer
141 views

Green functions in QFT

What is the sense of Green function $$ \langle | \hat {T}(u_{1}(x_{1})...u_{n}(x_{n})\hat {S})|\rangle , \quad \hat {S} = \hat{T}e^{i\int \hat {L}(x)d^{4}x} ? $$ How is it connected with scattering ...
2
votes
1answer
67 views

How exactly to show that s-matrix elements diverges because time-ordering is not well determined?

Let's have s-matrix: $$ S_{\alpha \beta} = \langle \alpha | \hat {S} | \beta \rangle , $$ $$\hat{S} = \hat{T}e^{-i\int \hat{L}(x)d^{4}x}, \quad \hat{T} \left( \hat{\Psi}(t) \hat{\Psi}(t') \right) = \...
2
votes
2answers
394 views

Derivation of the full generator of the Lorentz transformations

Let us study the subgroup of the Poincare group that leaves the point $x=0$ invariant, that is the Lorentz group. The action of an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation on a field $\Phi(0)$ is $L_{\mu \...