Renormalization is an ensemble of techniques which serves to treat the infinities which appear in quantum field theory or statistical mechanics.

learn more… | top users | synonyms (1)

3
votes
1answer
63 views

Why Conserved Current Should Not Need Renormalization?

May be this is trivial but I need to understand why the renormalization of conserved current is not necessary ? As for example, in this paper, they demand (2$^{nd}$ paragraph of the 2$^{nd}$ column in ...
6
votes
1answer
193 views

Intuition for parameter $\mu$ in dimensional regularization

In dimensional regularization, a dimensionless coupling $g$ is replaced by $\mu^{4-d}g$ so that it can remain dimensionless. $\mu$ is unphysical, though its choice affects the values of counterterms. ...
3
votes
0answers
97 views

Renormalization confusion

I'm starting to read about renormalization in the case of scalar field theory. I have some confusions. I will consider momentum renormalization. First, consider a theory with a coupling constant $g$....
1
vote
0answers
50 views

History of Renormalization Group

I want to study from an historical point of view the renormalization group (starting from statistical mechanics). Are there any historical (but also technical) books about this? Thanks.
4
votes
0answers
68 views

Symmetry of interaction lagrangian and symmetry of full lagrangian

Suppose we have lagrangian $$ \tag 1 L = \frac{\theta}{f_{\gamma}}F_{EM}\tilde{F}_{EM} +\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\theta)^2 - \frac{1}{2}m_{\theta}^2\theta^2 + L_{SM}, $$ where $\tilde{F}_{EM}$ ...
-2
votes
1answer
60 views

Why the QED coupling constant is a continuous function? [closed]

In page 316 of 'Student friendly quantum field theory', when discussing Figure 12-4, it says that the QED coupling constant is a continuous function of $\ln(p)$. But I think it's disconnected at $p=...
4
votes
2answers
141 views

Determinant of a propagator

Say I have a path integral $\int D \phi \exp(i S_0)$. $S_0$ is the usual free action $$S_0=\frac{1}{2}\int\phi (-\Box-m^2) \phi=\frac{1}{2}\int \phi G^{-1} \phi,$$ and at the moment I'm not ...
0
votes
0answers
95 views

How are the real-space RG transformations defined?

I'm reading Shang-keng Ma's book Modern theory of critical phenomena, and I'm a bit confused as to how the real-space RG transformations are defined. Ma basically says that these transformations are ...
2
votes
2answers
72 views

A small issue in renormalisation group formalism

In the general RG formalism, suppose $\vec{\mu}$ represents a vector in parameter space and $\vec{\mu}^*$ is the fixed point under the transformation $R$. Then for $\vec{\mu}=\vec{\mu}^*+\delta \vec{\...
7
votes
0answers
366 views

How do we know for sure a theory is non-renormalizable?

In quantum field theory, we are looking for a Lagrangian that is, amongst other, renormalizable. But how do we determine whether or not a theory is renormalizable? Is this purely done by power ...
5
votes
1answer
123 views

Renormalization and Conway/Surreal Numbers

In the final chapter of his book "An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory", Paul Teller writes about three interpretations of renormalization in quantum field theory. In particular, ...
2
votes
1answer
199 views

How to Calculate Anomalous Dimensions in (Effective) QED

I am following the conventions here. Consider the (effective) QED Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{4}Z_3F_{\mu\nu}^2+Z_2\bar{\psi}i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi-Z_2Z_mm\bar{\psi}\psi+Z_eZ_2\sqrt{...
0
votes
0answers
30 views

Charge screening

By the charge screening effect the charge of the electron increases if the scale of energy increases. But which charge increases, the "true" charge or the bae chagre which will be normalized to the "...
2
votes
0answers
46 views

Why is the term $m\delta_2\delta_m\bar{\psi}\psi$ ignored in the QED Lagrangian?

Consider the QED Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L}=\bar{\psi}_0(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-e_0\gamma^{\mu}A_{0\mu}-m_0)\psi_0-\frac{1}{4}(\partial_{\mu}A_{0\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{0\mu})^2$$ where the 0 ...
1
vote
0answers
85 views

What is the exact meaning that QED perturbative series is only asymptotic and eventually diverges at very high orders?

When I read paper PRB89, 235431 about the effective field theory of graphene, there is a statement that QED perturbative series is only asymptotic and eventually diverges at very high orders (e. g. ...
3
votes
1answer
361 views

Peskin Schroeder and the general solution to Callan-Symanzik Equation

I have a couple of questions regarding Peskin and Schroeder's derivation of the solution to the Callan-Symanzik equation. First of all, they claim that using $$\int_\lambda^\bar{\lambda}\frac{d\lambda'...
3
votes
0answers
157 views

SU(2) critical point and volume dependence

I am doing multi-dimensional plots of $\beta_j$ for SU(2) for infinite volume to understand the flow behavior and I was wondering, before I go too much further, if anyone knew off the top of their ...
6
votes
3answers
361 views

What happens when you apply the path integral to the Einstein-Hilbert action?

The Einstein Field Equations emerge when applying the principle of least action to the Einstein-Hilbert action, and from what I understand the path integral formulation generalizes the principle of ...
3
votes
1answer
185 views

Wilsonian Renormalization Group and Symmetries of the EFT

I have am action $S_0$ valid up to energy scale $\Lambda_0$ with renormalisable terms. I want to study the EFT at a lower scale $\Lambda \ll \Lambda_0$, by using the Wilsonian RG. It will give me an ...
2
votes
0answers
65 views

QFT: What does “finiteness” mean?

As above: what is the definition of a QFT to be "finite"? That all UV corrections are finite and there are no divergences at all? That there are divergences, but these divergences can be absorbed ...
1
vote
0answers
59 views

renormalization - free energy density scaling

By introduction to the renormalization theory we have started with the following Hamiltonian: $$ H=\int d^d x [\delta m^2+k(\nabla m)^2+h m ] $$ We have assumed that $\delta$ and $h$ scale as: $$ \...
1
vote
1answer
204 views

Complete renormalization in $\phi^4$-theory?

In the one-loop renormalization of $\phi^4$-theory, only 1PI vertex functions $\Gamma^{(2)}$ and $\Gamma^{(4)}$ are regularized and renormalized. But they do not exhaust all the irreducible connected ...
0
votes
1answer
192 views

Is the self energy divergence problem of point charge resolved in the context of general relativity?

The point charge model of electron became problematic in the context of electrodynamics/special relativity, because if we calculate the mass/energy of the electric field, it becomes divergent in the ...
4
votes
2answers
480 views

Renormalization Group and Ising with d=1 and D=1 [closed]

I have a question about the results of RG on Ising model. I know it's possible to obtain two couple of relations $K'(K)$, $q(K')$ $K(K')$, $q(K)$ between the coupling costants. My problem arise ...
4
votes
2answers
209 views

Are critical exponents below and above the critical point always same?

The scaling relations don't distinguish the the critical exponents below and above the critical value. In the mean field level, I understand these critical exponents are same whatever one approaches ...
0
votes
1answer
44 views

How to interpret “smooth momentum space slicing” in renormalization group analysis?

Ref: [John B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979), An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems]. More precisely, please refer to Page 703 within the section of renormalization group ...
16
votes
1answer
1k views

If renormalization scale is arbitrary, why do we care about running couplings?

For the bounty please verify the following reasoning [copied from comment below] Ah right, so the idea is that overall observable quantities must be independent of the renormalization scale. But at ...
0
votes
0answers
38 views

Lattice propagator computation

I am reading this lecture on random surface theory by Thordur Jonsson. I feel like I should describe the problem a little for those who don't want to read the lecture. We are ultimately interested in ...
2
votes
1answer
135 views

CP-violation in weak and strong sectors

There is a possible CP-violating term in the strong sector of the standard model proportional to $\theta_\text{QCD}$. In the absence of this term, the strong interactions are CP-invariant. In the ...
0
votes
0answers
71 views

QED+Classical Background Renormalization

I would like to ask a question related to quantum corrections and renormalization in QED. We have the QED vertex $\overline{\psi}[-ie \gamma^{\mu}(B_{\mu}+A_{\mu})]\psi,$ being $B_{\mu}$ a classical ...
8
votes
1answer
118 views

Why is a vertex a derivative of the propagator?

Where can I find the proof to this nice trick: if the momentum $q$ is small, the vertex is the derivative with respect to the mass of a propagator times a factor $(-m/v)$ like in the picture:
0
votes
0answers
27 views

If we considered chiral perturbation theory with coplex $\phi$-s, wold the next lo leading order renormalization $\gamma$-s change?

The Lagrangian of chiral perturbation theory (with two quark flavors) is written using the following matrix $U$ $$U=e^{i\sigma^i\phi_i/f}$$ where $\sigma^i$ are the Pauli matrices, $\phi_i$ are three ...
0
votes
0answers
69 views

About equivalence of two ways of “derivation” of Standard model

Two ways of SM derivation I know two methods of SM lagrangian "derivation". The first one, which I will call as Weinberg way, is based on approaches of SM as theory with spontaneusly broken $SU(2)_{...
16
votes
1answer
953 views

The divergence in QCD Series— How many are they, and what do they mean?

I am referring to this question, and especially this answer. In addition, QCD has - like all field theories - only an asymptotic perturbation series, which means that the series itself will ...
2
votes
1answer
79 views

Ultraviolet behaviour in dimensional regularization

In dimensional regularization, we introduce an arbitrary energy scale $\mu$. Naively, it plays the role of another parameter of the theory that needs to be fixed experimentally, but actually it is not ...
4
votes
0answers
92 views

How to handle the infrared divergence of massless $\phi^4$ in scattering

For massless $\phi^4$ theory, if exterior momentums are going to zero, then this diagram will be $$\int \frac{dk^4}{k^4}$$ will suffer from infrared divergence. Because the infrared divergence, ...
25
votes
3answers
7k views

Why is gravity so hard to unify with the other 3 fundamental forces?

Electricity and magnetism was unified in the 19th century, and unification of electromagnetism with the weak force followed suit, bringing into play the electroweak force. I've been told that ...
1
vote
0answers
72 views

How do I apply a renormalization technique to estimate the fractal dimension of a diffusion limited aggregate?

Diffusion Limited Aggregation (DLA) is an interesting phenomena observed in nature and discussed here. From a theoretical view point, it'd be nice to know about the fractal dimension of a DLA formed ...
0
votes
1answer
51 views

What is the $D_{x^2-y^2}$ symmetry/channel/instabilitied referred to with regards to super-conductivity?

I have been reading various articles on Renormalization group where they compute the flow of some parameter which becomes increasingly attractive and then say that parameter is responsible for Cooper ...
1
vote
0answers
38 views

Relation between renormalisation matrix and anomalous dimension

I need an relation between the renormalization constant matrix and the anamalous dimension matrix. Now I found the following derivation \begin{equation} \begin{split} \gamma (a_\mu) &= Z^{-1}...
0
votes
0answers
40 views

Does quantum chromodynamics imply continuous space? [duplicate]

I am thinking it does. That's because a pillar of quantum chromodynamics is renormalization, which is itself due to the assumption that electrons are point particles (having no extent). A point ...
7
votes
1answer
514 views

Does the Standard Model have a Landau pole?

I have seen the statement that the Standard Model has a Landau pole, or at least it its believed that it does at $\sim 10^{34}$ GeV. Has this actually been proven (at least in perturbation theory, as ...
6
votes
2answers
295 views

Physical explanations for renormalization

Some related questions on Renormalization: Why is renormalization even necessary? My understanding is that the supposed problem is that the sums of certain amplitudes end up being infinite. But ...
1
vote
0answers
88 views

Any textbook about non-renormalizability of gravity?

I have learned general relativity in a graduate-level. My knowledge about QFT is very rudimentary. But, I need to learn about non-renormalizability of gravity. I have these questions. Is there any ...
1
vote
0answers
43 views

A functional average calculation confusion within Gaussian planar model's RG

I am trying to follow some detailed calculation in a famous paper [John, B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979), An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems]. More precisely, please ...
1
vote
1answer
76 views

How to choose the proper loop correction?

I review my QFT lecture notes and I am having hard times to figure out the significance of Ward identity in vacuum polarization. In class, we calculated one loop correction stated as $$ i\Pi^{\mu\...
0
votes
0answers
54 views

How Ward Identity indicate vacuum polarization correction?

In Peskin & Schroeder Chapter 7.5 Renormalization of The Electric Charge, they mention that vacuum polarization correction is $$ iM= (-ie)^2(-1)\int_{}{}\frac{d^4k} {(2\pi)^4}Tr\bigg[\gamma^{\mu}\...
3
votes
1answer
174 views

Aren't $\phi^4$ composite operators?

I have this trouble with terminology. I wonder why authors introduce the concept of composite operators after they've already talked about eg phi four theory, it phi cubed. Aren't these operators ...
0
votes
0answers
70 views

Why does not the bare interaction potential appear in the Bogoliubov theory?

They use some effective potential defined by the s-wave scattering length, but not the bare atom-atom interaction $V(r)$. Why? It is standard practice in second quantization to use the bare ...
12
votes
3answers
2k views

Do particles with exactly zero energy exist?

In my understanding, in Newtonian mechanics if something has no mass it cannot be said to "exist" since it cannot possibly have energy or momentum and thus cannot participate in interactions or be ...